X-Git-Url: https://git.proxmox.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=CODING_STYLE;h=2fa0c0b65b6c1315202741193b725b537f2bf2ff;hb=b8adbc657802482e4da1767bf983ebfdf9bfe9fc;hp=a579cb1b5ff16bc44ba7c1afac2d285e9ffeb66c;hpb=c227f0995e1722a1abccc28cadf0664266bd8043;p=mirror_qemu.git diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE index a579cb1b5f..2fa0c0b65b 100644 --- a/CODING_STYLE +++ b/CODING_STYLE @@ -1,12 +1,15 @@ -Qemu Coding Style +QEMU Coding Style ================= +Please use the script checkpatch.pl in the scripts directory to check +patches before submitting. + 1. Whitespace Of course, the most important aspect in any coding style is whitespace. Crusty old coders who have trouble spotting the glasses on their noses can tell the difference between a tab and eight spaces from a distance -of approximately fifteen parsecs. Many a flamewar have been fought and +of approximately fifteen parsecs. Many a flamewar has been fought and lost on this issue. QEMU indents are four spaces. Tabs are never used, except in Makefiles @@ -28,7 +31,11 @@ Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines. 2. Line width -Lines are 80 characters; not longer. +Lines should be 80 characters; try not to make them longer. + +Sometimes it is hard to do, especially when dealing with QEMU subsystems +that use long function or symbol names. Even in that case, do not make +lines much longer than 80 characters. Rationale: - Some people like to tile their 24" screens with a 6x4 matrix of 80x24 @@ -36,18 +43,21 @@ Rationale: let them keep doing it. - Code and especially patches is much more readable if limited to a sane line length. Eighty is traditional. + - The four-space indentation makes the most common excuse ("But look + at all that white space on the left!") moot. - It is the QEMU coding style. 3. Naming Variables are lower_case_with_underscores; easy to type and read. Structured -type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out. Scalar type +type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out. Enum type +names and function type names should also be in CamelCase. Scalar type names are lower_case_with_underscores_ending_with_a_t, like the POSIX uint64_t and family. Note that this last convention contradicts POSIX and is therefore likely to be changed. -Typedefs are used to eliminate the redundant 'struct' keyword. It is the -QEMU coding style. +When wrapping standard library functions, use the prefix qemu_ to alert +readers that they are seeing a wrapped version; otherwise avoid this prefix. 4. Block structure @@ -65,6 +75,10 @@ keyword. Example: printf("a was something else entirely.\n"); } +Note that 'else if' is considered a single statement; otherwise a long if/ +else if/else if/.../else sequence would need an indent for every else +statement. + An exception is the opening brace for a function; for reasons of tradition and clarity it comes on a line by itself: @@ -76,3 +90,36 @@ and clarity it comes on a line by itself: Rationale: a consistent (except for functions...) bracing style reduces ambiguity and avoids needless churn when lines are added or removed. Furthermore, it is the QEMU coding style. + +5. Declarations + +Mixed declarations (interleaving statements and declarations within +blocks) are generally not allowed; declarations should be at the beginning +of blocks. + +Every now and then, an exception is made for declarations inside a +#ifdef or #ifndef block: if the code looks nicer, such declarations can +be placed at the top of the block even if there are statements above. +On the other hand, however, it's often best to move that #ifdef/#ifndef +block to a separate function altogether. + +6. Conditional statements + +When comparing a variable for (in)equality with a constant, list the +constant on the right, as in: + +if (a == 1) { + /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */ + do_something(); +} + +Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read. +Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=', +even when the constant is on the right. + +7. Comment style + +We use traditional C-style /* */ comments and avoid // comments. + +Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of +consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this.