From: Kui-Feng Lee Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:41:38 +0000 (-0700) Subject: selftests/bpf: Ensure libbpf skip all-zeros fields of struct_ops maps. X-Git-Tag: Ubuntu-6.11.0-9.9~1473^2~432^2~25^2 X-Git-Url: https://git.proxmox.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=26a7cf2bbea656837583f9a1a0f9390db63d6cc3;p=mirror_ubuntu-kernels.git selftests/bpf: Ensure libbpf skip all-zeros fields of struct_ops maps. A new version of a type may have additional fields that do not exist in older versions. Previously, libbpf would reject struct_ops maps with a new version containing extra fields when running on a machine with an old kernel. However, we have updated libbpf to ignore these fields if their values are all zeros or null in order to provide backward compatibility. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240313214139.685112-3-thinker.li@gmail.com --- diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c index ee5372c7f2c7..098776d00ab4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c @@ -93,9 +93,56 @@ cleanup: struct_ops_module__destroy(skel); } +static void test_struct_ops_not_zeroed(void) +{ + struct struct_ops_module *skel; + int err; + + /* zeroed is 0, and zeroed_op is null */ + skel = struct_ops_module__open(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_open")) + return; + + err = struct_ops_module__load(skel); + ASSERT_OK(err, "struct_ops_module_load"); + + struct_ops_module__destroy(skel); + + /* zeroed is not 0 */ + skel = struct_ops_module__open(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_open_not_zeroed")) + return; + + /* libbpf should reject the testmod_zeroed since struct + * bpf_testmod_ops in the kernel has no "zeroed" field and the + * value of "zeroed" is non-zero. + */ + skel->struct_ops.testmod_zeroed->zeroed = 0xdeadbeef; + err = struct_ops_module__load(skel); + ASSERT_ERR(err, "struct_ops_module_load_not_zeroed"); + + struct_ops_module__destroy(skel); + + /* zeroed_op is not null */ + skel = struct_ops_module__open(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_open_not_zeroed_op")) + return; + + /* libbpf should reject the testmod_zeroed since the value of its + * "zeroed_op" is not null. + */ + skel->struct_ops.testmod_zeroed->zeroed_op = skel->progs.test_3; + err = struct_ops_module__load(skel); + ASSERT_ERR(err, "struct_ops_module_load_not_zeroed_op"); + + struct_ops_module__destroy(skel); +} + void serial_test_struct_ops_module(void) { if (test__start_subtest("test_struct_ops_load")) test_struct_ops_load(); + if (test__start_subtest("test_struct_ops_not_zeroed")) + test_struct_ops_not_zeroed(); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c index 026cabfa7f1f..86e1e50c5531 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ void BPF_PROG(test_2, int a, int b) test_2_result = a + b; } -SEC("struct_ops/test_3") +SEC("?struct_ops/test_3") int BPF_PROG(test_3, int a, int b) { test_2_result = a + b + 3; @@ -54,3 +54,17 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 testmod_2 = { .test_1 = (void *)test_1, .test_2 = (void *)test_2_v2, }; + +struct bpf_testmod_ops___zeroed { + int (*test_1)(void); + void (*test_2)(int a, int b); + int (*test_maybe_null)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task); + void (*zeroed_op)(int a, int b); + int zeroed; +}; + +SEC(".struct_ops.link") +struct bpf_testmod_ops___zeroed testmod_zeroed = { + .test_1 = (void *)test_1, + .test_2 = (void *)test_2_v2, +};