From: Christian Brauner Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 04:59:51 +0000 (-0700) Subject: signal: make force_sigsegv() void X-Git-Tag: Ubuntu-5.4-5.4.0-11.14~4684^2~34 X-Git-Url: https://git.proxmox.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=52cba1a274818c3ee6299c1a1b476e7bc5037a2f;p=mirror_ubuntu-focal-kernel.git signal: make force_sigsegv() void Patch series "signal: refactor some functions", v3. This series refactors a bunch of functions in signal.c to simplify parts of the code. The greatest single change is declaring the static do_sigpending() helper as void which makes it possible to remove a bunch of unnecessary checks in the syscalls later on. This patch (of 17): force_sigsegv() returned 0 unconditionally so it doesn't make sense to have it return at all. In addition, there are no callers that check force_sigsegv()'s return value. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180602103653.18181-2-christian@brauner.io Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton Cc: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: James Morris Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephen Smalley Cc: Al Viro Cc: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h index 113d1ad1ced7..e138ac16c650 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h +++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ int force_sig_pkuerr(void __user *addr, u32 pkey); int force_sig_ptrace_errno_trap(int errno, void __user *addr); extern int send_sig_info(int, struct siginfo *, struct task_struct *); -extern int force_sigsegv(int, struct task_struct *); +extern void force_sigsegv(int sig, struct task_struct *p); extern int force_sig_info(int, struct siginfo *, struct task_struct *); extern int __kill_pgrp_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct pid *pgrp); extern int kill_pid_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct pid *pid); diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 8d8a940422a8..8a828baa0f93 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -1458,8 +1458,7 @@ send_sig(int sig, struct task_struct *p, int priv) return send_sig_info(sig, __si_special(priv), p); } -void -force_sig(int sig, struct task_struct *p) +void force_sig(int sig, struct task_struct *p) { force_sig_info(sig, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p); } @@ -1470,8 +1469,7 @@ force_sig(int sig, struct task_struct *p) * the problem was already a SIGSEGV, we'll want to * make sure we don't even try to deliver the signal.. */ -int -force_sigsegv(int sig, struct task_struct *p) +void force_sigsegv(int sig, struct task_struct *p) { if (sig == SIGSEGV) { unsigned long flags; @@ -1480,7 +1478,6 @@ force_sigsegv(int sig, struct task_struct *p) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->sighand->siglock, flags); } force_sig(SIGSEGV, p); - return 0; } int force_sig_fault(int sig, int code, void __user *addr