From: Vitaly Kuznetsov Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 14:47:05 +0000 (+0100) Subject: KVM: nVMX: Sanitize primary processor-based VM-execution controls with eVMCS too X-Git-Tag: Ubuntu-6.5.0-9.9~3246^2~14^2~59 X-Git-Url: https://git.proxmox.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bbbaf8cd1735770342aad4c6624a147ae321599b;p=mirror_ubuntu-kernels.git KVM: nVMX: Sanitize primary processor-based VM-execution controls with eVMCS too The only unsupported primary processor-based VM-execution control at the moment is CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_TERTIARY_CONTROLS and KVM doesn't expose it in nested VMX feature MSRs anyway (see nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs()) but in preparation to inverting "unsupported with eVMCS" checks (and for completeness) it's better to sanitize MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS/ MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PROCBASED_CTLS too. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov Message-Id: <20221104144708.435865-2-vkuznets@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c index ae03d1fe0355..04ea0259ab7f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.c @@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ enum evmcs_revision { enum evmcs_ctrl_type { EVMCS_EXIT_CTRLS, EVMCS_ENTRY_CTRLS, + EVMCS_EXEC_CTRL, EVMCS_2NDEXEC, EVMCS_PINCTRL, EVMCS_VMFUNC, @@ -374,6 +375,9 @@ static const u32 evmcs_unsupported_ctrls[NR_EVMCS_CTRLS][NR_EVMCS_REVISIONS] = { [EVMCS_ENTRY_CTRLS] = { [EVMCSv1_LEGACY] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL, }, + [EVMCS_EXEC_CTRL] = { + [EVMCSv1_LEGACY] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_EXEC_CTRL, + }, [EVMCS_2NDEXEC] = { [EVMCSv1_LEGACY] = EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC, }, @@ -434,6 +438,10 @@ void nested_evmcs_filter_control_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 * unsupported_ctrls |= VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL; ctl_high &= ~unsupported_ctrls; break; + case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS: + case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PROCBASED_CTLS: + ctl_high &= ~evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(EVMCS_EXEC_CTRL); + break; case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2: ctl_high &= ~evmcs_get_unsupported_ctls(EVMCS_2NDEXEC); break; @@ -461,6 +469,10 @@ int nested_evmcs_check_controls(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) vmcs12->pin_based_vm_exec_control))) return -EINVAL; + if (CC(!nested_evmcs_is_valid_controls(EVMCS_EXEC_CTRL, + vmcs12->cpu_based_vm_exec_control))) + return -EINVAL; + if (CC(!nested_evmcs_is_valid_controls(EVMCS_2NDEXEC, vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control))) return -EINVAL;