From: Robin Murphy Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 15:34:18 +0000 (+0000) Subject: arm64: Make USER_DS an inclusive limit X-Git-Tag: Ubuntu-4.13.0-37.42~41 X-Git-Url: https://git.proxmox.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f141aa4fd3a5720b99f80e40c5d5946647ae3234;p=mirror_ubuntu-artful-kernel.git arm64: Make USER_DS an inclusive limit Commit 51369e398d0d upstream. Currently, USER_DS represents an exclusive limit while KERNEL_DS is inclusive. In order to do some clever trickery for speculation-safe masking, we need them both to behave equivalently - there aren't enough bits to make KERNEL_DS exclusive, so we have precisely one option. This also happens to correct a longstanding false negative for a range ending on the very top byte of kernel memory. Mark Rutland points out that we've actually got the semantics of addresses vs. segments muddled up in most of the places we need to amend, so shuffle the {USER,KERNEL}_DS definitions around such that we can correct those properly instead of just pasting "-1"s everywhere. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman (cherry picked from commit 535357c9d3e94115b87e11a3014ea29c8a0c26fb) CVE-2017-5753 CVE-2017-5715 CVE-2017-5754 Signed-off-by: Paolo Pisati Acked-by: Brad Figg Acked-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza Acked-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza --- diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h index 1c2d087d0528..67e8d407863e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ #define TASK_SIZE_64 (UL(1) << VA_BITS) +#define KERNEL_DS UL(-1) +#define USER_DS (TASK_SIZE_64 - 1) + #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ /* diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h index 335dfe02a846..87a6a52cee65 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -35,10 +35,7 @@ #include #include -#define KERNEL_DS (-1UL) #define get_ds() (KERNEL_DS) - -#define USER_DS TASK_SIZE_64 #define get_fs() (current_thread_info()->addr_limit) static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs) @@ -66,22 +63,32 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs) * Returns 1 if the range is valid, 0 otherwise. * * This is equivalent to the following test: - * (u65)addr + (u65)size <= current->addr_limit - * - * This needs 65-bit arithmetic. + * (u65)addr + (u65)size <= (u65)current->addr_limit + 1 */ -#define __range_ok(addr, size) \ -({ \ - unsigned long __addr = (unsigned long)(addr); \ - unsigned long flag, roksum; \ - __chk_user_ptr(addr); \ - asm("adds %1, %1, %3; ccmp %1, %4, #2, cc; cset %0, ls" \ - : "=&r" (flag), "=&r" (roksum) \ - : "1" (__addr), "Ir" (size), \ - "r" (current_thread_info()->addr_limit) \ - : "cc"); \ - flag; \ -}) +static inline unsigned long __range_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size) +{ + unsigned long limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit; + + __chk_user_ptr(addr); + asm volatile( + // A + B <= C + 1 for all A,B,C, in four easy steps: + // 1: X = A + B; X' = X % 2^64 + " adds %0, %0, %2\n" + // 2: Set C = 0 if X > 2^64, to guarantee X' > C in step 4 + " csel %1, xzr, %1, hi\n" + // 3: Set X' = ~0 if X >= 2^64. For X == 2^64, this decrements X' + // to compensate for the carry flag being set in step 4. For + // X > 2^64, X' merely has to remain nonzero, which it does. + " csinv %0, %0, xzr, cc\n" + // 4: For X < 2^64, this gives us X' - C - 1 <= 0, where the -1 + // comes from the carry in being clear. Otherwise, we are + // testing X' - C == 0, subject to the previous adjustments. + " sbcs xzr, %0, %1\n" + " cset %0, ls\n" + : "+r" (addr), "+r" (limit) : "Ir" (size) : "cc"); + + return addr; +} /* * When dealing with data aborts, watchpoints, or instruction traps we may end @@ -90,7 +97,7 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs) */ #define untagged_addr(addr) sign_extend64(addr, 55) -#define access_ok(type, addr, size) __range_ok(addr, size) +#define access_ok(type, addr, size) __range_ok((unsigned long)(addr), size) #define user_addr_max get_fs #define _ASM_EXTABLE(from, to) \ diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S index b5063036629d..fef9ac1835d1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S @@ -167,10 +167,10 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif .else add x21, sp, #S_FRAME_SIZE get_thread_info tsk - /* Save the task's original addr_limit and set USER_DS (TASK_SIZE_64) */ + /* Save the task's original addr_limit and set USER_DS */ ldr x20, [tsk, #TSK_TI_ADDR_LIMIT] str x20, [sp, #S_ORIG_ADDR_LIMIT] - mov x20, #TASK_SIZE_64 + mov x20, #USER_DS str x20, [tsk, #TSK_TI_ADDR_LIMIT] /* No need to reset PSTATE.UAO, hardware's already set it to 0 for us */ .endif /* \el == 0 */ diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c index a7c5196e2eab..addfb8c2e349 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static inline bool is_permission_fault(unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs, if (fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM) return true; - if (addr < USER_DS && system_uses_ttbr0_pan()) + if (addr < TASK_SIZE && system_uses_ttbr0_pan()) return fsc_type == ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT && (regs->pstate & PSR_PAN_BIT); @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, mm_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; } - if (addr < USER_DS && is_permission_fault(esr, regs, addr)) { + if (addr < TASK_SIZE && is_permission_fault(esr, regs, addr)) { /* regs->orig_addr_limit may be 0 if we entered from EL0 */ if (regs->orig_addr_limit == KERNEL_DS) die("Accessing user space memory with fs=KERNEL_DS", regs, esr);