From 02f39f4081e4a0429bdd38056b696c4ad276a973 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 13:30:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] srcu: Provide ordering for CPU not involved in grace period BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720154 commit 35732cf9dd38b1efb0f2f22c91c61b51337d1ac3 upstream. Tree RCU guarantees that every online CPU has a memory barrier between any given grace period and any of that CPU's RCU read-side sections that must be ordered against that grace period. Since RCU doesn't always know where read-side critical sections are, the actual implementation guarantees order against prior and subsequent non-idle non-offline code, whether in an RCU read-side critical section or not. As a result, there does not need to be a memory barrier at the end of synchronize_rcu() and friends because the ordering internal to the grace period has ordered every CPU's post-grace-period execution against each CPU's pre-grace-period execution, again for all non-idle online CPUs. In contrast, SRCU can have non-idle online CPUs that are completely uninvolved in a given SRCU grace period, for example, a CPU that never runs any SRCU read-side critical sections and took no part in the grace-period processing. It is in theory possible for a given synchronize_srcu()'s wakeup to be delivered to a CPU that was completely uninvolved in the prior SRCU grace period, which could mean that the code following that synchronize_srcu() would end up being unordered with respect to both the grace period and any pre-existing SRCU read-side critical sections. This commit therefore adds an smp_mb() to the end of __synchronize_srcu(), which prevents this scenario from occurring. Reported-by: Lance Roy Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: Lance Roy Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee --- kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c index d0ca524bf042..258a9abee0b0 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c @@ -896,6 +896,15 @@ static void __synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, bool do_norm) __call_srcu(sp, &rcu.head, wakeme_after_rcu, do_norm); wait_for_completion(&rcu.completion); destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rcu.head); + + /* + * Make sure that later code is ordered after the SRCU grace + * period. This pairs with the raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node() + * in srcu_invoke_callbacks(). Unlike Tree RCU, this is needed + * because the current CPU might have been totally uninvolved with + * (and thus unordered against) that grace period. + */ + smp_mb(); } /** -- 2.39.2