From 0376374a98abd533fb49c6db12967bddc2f4b4b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 01:57:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix locking bugs when defragging leaves When running fstests btrfs/070, with a higher number of fsstress operations, I ran frequently into two different locking bugs when defragging directories. The first bug produced the following traces: [133860.229792] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [133860.251062] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 26057 at fs/btrfs/locking.c:46 btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw+0x57/0xbd [btrfs]() [133860.253576] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse parport_pc i2c_piix4 psmouse parport [133860.282566] CPU: 2 PID: 26057 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.3.0-rc5-btrfs-next-17+ #1 [133860.284393] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [133860.286827] 0000000000000000 ffff880207697b78 ffffffff812566f4 0000000000000000 [133860.288341] ffff880207697bb0 ffffffff8104d0a6 ffffffffa052d4c1 ffff880178f60e00 [133860.294219] ffff880178f60e00 0000000000000000 00000000000000f6 ffff880207697bc0 [133860.295831] Call Trace: [133860.306518] [] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79 [133860.307473] [] warn_slowpath_common+0x9f/0xb8 [133860.308619] [] ? btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw+0x57/0xbd [btrfs] [133860.310068] [] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [133860.312552] [] btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw+0x57/0xbd [btrfs] [133860.314630] [] btrfs_set_lock_blocking+0xe/0x10 [btrfs] [133860.323596] [] btrfs_realloc_node+0xb3/0x341 [btrfs] [133860.325233] [] btrfs_defrag_leaves+0x239/0x2fa [btrfs] [133860.332427] [] btrfs_defrag_root+0x63/0xca [btrfs] [133860.337259] [] btrfs_ioctl_defrag+0x78/0x14e [btrfs] [133860.340147] [] btrfs_ioctl+0x746/0x24c6 [btrfs] [133860.344833] [] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [133860.346343] [] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7 [133860.353248] [] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7 [133860.354242] [] ? __might_fault+0xa5/0xa7 [133860.355232] [] ? cp_new_stat+0x15d/0x174 [133860.356237] [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x427/0x4e6 [133860.358587] [] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e [133860.360195] [] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71 [133860.361380] [] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [133860.363578] [] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [133860.366217] ---[ end trace 2cadb2f653437e49 ]--- [133860.367399] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [133860.368162] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/locking.c:307! [133860.369430] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [133860.370205] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse parport_pc i2c_piix4 psmouse parport [133860.370205] CPU: 2 PID: 26057 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.3.0-rc5-btrfs-next-17+ #1 [133860.370205] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [133860.370205] task: ffff8800aec6db40 ti: ffff880207694000 task.ti: ffff880207694000 [133860.370205] RIP: 0010:[] [] btrfs_assert_tree_locked+0x10/0x14 [btrfs] [133860.370205] RSP: 0018:ffff880207697bc0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [133860.370205] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880178f60e00 RCX: 0000000000000000 [133860.370205] RDX: ffff88023ec4fb50 RSI: 00000000ffffffff RDI: ffff880178f60e00 [133860.370205] RBP: ffff880207697bc0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [133860.370205] R10: 0000160000000000 R11: ffffffff81651000 R12: ffff880178f60e00 [133860.370205] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000000000f6 R15: ffff8801ff409000 [133860.370205] FS: 00007f763efd48c0(0000) GS:ffff88023ec40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [133860.370205] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [133860.370205] CR2: 0000000002158048 CR3: 000000003fd6c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [133860.370205] Stack: [133860.370205] ffff880207697bd8 ffffffffa052d4d0 0000000000000000 ffff880207697be8 [133860.370205] ffffffffa04d5787 ffff880207697c80 ffffffffa04d99cb ffff8801ff409590 [133860.370205] ffff880207697ca8 000000f507697c80 ffff880183c11bb8 0000000000000000 [133860.370205] Call Trace: [133860.370205] [] btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw+0x66/0xbd [btrfs] [133860.370205] [] btrfs_set_lock_blocking+0xe/0x10 [btrfs] [133860.370205] [] btrfs_realloc_node+0xb3/0x341 [btrfs] [133860.370205] [] btrfs_defrag_leaves+0x239/0x2fa [btrfs] [133860.370205] [] btrfs_defrag_root+0x63/0xca [btrfs] [133860.370205] [] btrfs_ioctl_defrag+0x78/0x14e [btrfs] [133860.370205] [] btrfs_ioctl+0x746/0x24c6 [btrfs] [133860.370205] [] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [133860.370205] [] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7 [133860.370205] [] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7 [133860.370205] [] ? __might_fault+0xa5/0xa7 [133860.370205] [] ? cp_new_stat+0x15d/0x174 [133860.370205] [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x427/0x4e6 [133860.370205] [] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e [133860.370205] [] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71 [133860.370205] [] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [133860.370205] [] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f This bug happened because we assumed that by setting keep_locks to 1 in our search path, our path after a call to btrfs_search_slot() would have all nodes locked, which is not always true because unlock_up() (called by btrfs_search_slot()) will unlock a node in a path if the slot of the node below it doesn't point to the last item or beyond the last item. For example, when the tree has a heigth of 2 and path->slots[0] has a value smaller than btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[0]) - 1, the node at level 2 will be unlocked (also because lowest_unlock is set to 1 due to the fact that the value passed as ins_len to btrfs_search_slot is 0). This resulted in btrfs_find_next_key(), called before btrfs_realloc_node(), to release out path and call again btrfs_search_slot(), but this time with the cow parameter set to 0, meaning the resulting path got only read locks. Therefore when we called btrfs_realloc_node(), with path->nodes[1] having a read lock, it resulted in the warning and BUG_ON when calling btrfs_set_lock_blocking() against the node, as that function expects the node to have a write lock. The second bug happened often when the first bug didn't happen, and made us hang and hitting the following warning at fs/btrfs/locking.c: 251 void btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb) 252 { 253 WARN_ON(eb->lock_owner == current->pid); This happened because the tree search we made at btrfs_defrag_leaves() before calling btrfs_find_next_key() locked a leaf and all the other nodes in the path, so btrfs_find_next_key() had no need to release the path and make a new search (with path->lowest_level set to 1). This made btrfs_realloc_node() attempt to write lock the same leaf again, resulting in a hang/deadlock. So fix these issues by calling btrfs_find_next_key() after calling btrfs_realloc_node() and setting the search path's lowest_level to 1 to avoid the hang/deadlock when attempting to write lock the leaves at btrfs_realloc_node(). Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana --- fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c index f31db4325339..cb65089127cc 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c @@ -89,6 +89,12 @@ int btrfs_defrag_leaves(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, goto out; } btrfs_release_path(path); + /* + * We don't need a lock on a leaf. btrfs_realloc_node() will lock all + * leafs from path->nodes[1], so set lowest_level to 1 to avoid later + * a deadlock (attempting to write lock an already write locked leaf). + */ + path->lowest_level = 1; wret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, 0, 1); if (wret < 0) { @@ -99,9 +105,12 @@ int btrfs_defrag_leaves(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ret = 0; goto out; } - path->slots[1] = btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[1]); - next_key_ret = btrfs_find_next_key(root, path, &key, 1, - min_trans); + /* + * The node at level 1 must always be locked when our path has + * keep_locks set and lowest_level is 1, regardless of the value of + * path->slots[1]. + */ + BUG_ON(path->locks[1] == 0); ret = btrfs_realloc_node(trans, root, path->nodes[1], 0, &last_ret, @@ -110,6 +119,18 @@ int btrfs_defrag_leaves(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, WARN_ON(ret == -EAGAIN); goto out; } + /* + * Now that we reallocated the node we can find the next key. Note that + * btrfs_find_next_key() can release our path and do another search + * without COWing, this is because even with path->keep_locks = 1, + * btrfs_search_slot() / ctree.c:unlock_up() does not keeps a lock on a + * node when path->slots[node_level - 1] does not point to the last + * item or a slot beyond the last item (ctree.c:unlock_up()). Therefore + * we search for the next key after reallocating our node. + */ + path->slots[1] = btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[1]); + next_key_ret = btrfs_find_next_key(root, path, &key, 1, + min_trans); if (next_key_ret == 0) { memcpy(&root->defrag_progress, &key, sizeof(key)); ret = -EAGAIN; -- 2.39.5