From 27d02568f529e908399514dfbee8ee43bdfd5299 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mike Rapoport Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:58:28 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] userfaultfd: mcopy_atomic: return -ENOENT when no compatible VMA found The memory mapping of a process may change between #PF event and the call to mcopy_atomic that comes to resolve the page fault. In such case, there will be no VMA covering the range passed to mcopy_atomic or the VMA will not have userfaultfd context. To allow uffd monitor to distinguish those case from other errors, let's return -ENOENT instead of -EINVAL. Note, that despite availability of UFFD_EVENT_UNMAP there still might be race between the processing of UFFD_EVENT_UNMAP and outstanding mcopy_atomic in case of non-cooperative uffd usage. [rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com: update cases returning -ENOENT] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170207150249.GA6709@rapoport-lnx [aarcange@redhat.com: merge fix] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix the merge fix] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1485542673-24387-5-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Acked-by: Hillf Danton Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: Mike Kravetz Cc: Pavel Emelyanov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/userfaultfd.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c index 1e5c2f94e8a3..9f0ad2a4f102 100644 --- a/mm/userfaultfd.c +++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c @@ -197,22 +197,25 @@ retry: * retry, dst_vma will be set to NULL and we must lookup again. */ if (!dst_vma) { - err = -EINVAL; + err = -ENOENT; dst_vma = find_vma(dst_mm, dst_start); if (!dst_vma || !is_vm_hugetlb_page(dst_vma)) goto out_unlock; - - if (vma_hpagesize != vma_kernel_pagesize(dst_vma)) - goto out_unlock; - /* - * Make sure the remaining dst range is both valid and - * fully within a single existing vma. + * Only allow __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb on userfaultfd + * registered ranges. */ + if (!dst_vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx) + goto out_unlock; + if (dst_start < dst_vma->vm_start || dst_start + len > dst_vma->vm_end) goto out_unlock; + err = -EINVAL; + if (vma_hpagesize != vma_kernel_pagesize(dst_vma)) + goto out_unlock; + vm_shared = dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED; } @@ -220,12 +223,6 @@ retry: (len - copied) & (vma_hpagesize - 1))) goto out_unlock; - /* - * Only allow __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb on userfaultfd registered ranges. - */ - if (!dst_vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx) - goto out_unlock; - /* * If not shared, ensure the dst_vma has a anon_vma. */ @@ -404,22 +401,35 @@ retry: * Make sure the vma is not shared, that the dst range is * both valid and fully within a single existing vma. */ - err = -EINVAL; + err = -ENOENT; dst_vma = find_vma(dst_mm, dst_start); if (!dst_vma) goto out_unlock; /* - * shmem_zero_setup is invoked in mmap for MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_SHARED but - * it will overwrite vm_ops, so vma_is_anonymous must return false. + * Be strict and only allow __mcopy_atomic on userfaultfd + * registered ranges to prevent userland errors going + * unnoticed. As far as the VM consistency is concerned, it + * would be perfectly safe to remove this check, but there's + * no useful usage for __mcopy_atomic ouside of userfaultfd + * registered ranges. This is after all why these are ioctls + * belonging to the userfaultfd and not syscalls. */ - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vma_is_anonymous(dst_vma) && - dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) + if (!dst_vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx) goto out_unlock; if (dst_start < dst_vma->vm_start || dst_start + len > dst_vma->vm_end) goto out_unlock; + err = -EINVAL; + /* + * shmem_zero_setup is invoked in mmap for MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_SHARED but + * it will overwrite vm_ops, so vma_is_anonymous must return false. + */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vma_is_anonymous(dst_vma) && + dst_vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) + goto out_unlock; + /* * If this is a HUGETLB vma, pass off to appropriate routine */ @@ -427,18 +437,6 @@ retry: return __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb(dst_mm, dst_vma, dst_start, src_start, len, zeropage); - /* - * Be strict and only allow __mcopy_atomic on userfaultfd - * registered ranges to prevent userland errors going - * unnoticed. As far as the VM consistency is concerned, it - * would be perfectly safe to remove this check, but there's - * no useful usage for __mcopy_atomic ouside of userfaultfd - * registered ranges. This is after all why these are ioctls - * belonging to the userfaultfd and not syscalls. - */ - if (!dst_vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx.ctx) - goto out_unlock; - if (!vma_is_anonymous(dst_vma) && !vma_is_shmem(dst_vma)) goto out_unlock; -- 2.39.5