From 382dbb40145076f3a023992117ddaaae1ced5af8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ido Schimmel Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:53:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Simplify LPM tree allocation When looking for a new LPM tree we should always consider all the unused trees. It doesn't matter if the new tree is required due to changes in currently used prefixes inside an existing routing table or because a route was inserted into an empty table. Both cases are functionally identical and therefore should be treated the same. When looking for a new LPM tree, consider all unused trees and don't reserve trees for specific cases. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- .../ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 22 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c index 1839ba05f4dd..c11a5baca539 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c @@ -196,19 +196,15 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_fib_destroy(struct mlxsw_sp_fib *fib) } static struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree * -mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_find_unused(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, bool one_reserved) +mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_find_unused(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp) { static struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree *lpm_tree; int i; for (i = 0; i < MLXSW_SP_LPM_TREE_COUNT; i++) { lpm_tree = &mlxsw_sp->router.lpm_trees[i]; - if (lpm_tree->ref_count == 0) { - if (one_reserved) - one_reserved = false; - else - return lpm_tree; - } + if (lpm_tree->ref_count == 0) + return lpm_tree; } return NULL; } @@ -262,12 +258,12 @@ mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_left_struct_set(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, static struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree * mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct mlxsw_sp_prefix_usage *prefix_usage, - enum mlxsw_sp_l3proto proto, bool one_reserved) + enum mlxsw_sp_l3proto proto) { struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree *lpm_tree; int err; - lpm_tree = mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_find_unused(mlxsw_sp, one_reserved); + lpm_tree = mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_find_unused(mlxsw_sp); if (!lpm_tree) return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY); lpm_tree->proto = proto; @@ -297,7 +293,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_destroy(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, static struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree * mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_get(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct mlxsw_sp_prefix_usage *prefix_usage, - enum mlxsw_sp_l3proto proto, bool one_reserved) + enum mlxsw_sp_l3proto proto) { struct mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree *lpm_tree; int i; @@ -311,7 +307,7 @@ mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_get(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, goto inc_ref_count; } lpm_tree = mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_create(mlxsw_sp, prefix_usage, - proto, one_reserved); + proto); if (IS_ERR(lpm_tree)) return lpm_tree; @@ -421,7 +417,7 @@ static struct mlxsw_sp_vr *mlxsw_sp_vr_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, mlxsw_sp_prefix_usage_zero(&req_prefix_usage); mlxsw_sp_prefix_usage_set(&req_prefix_usage, prefix_len); lpm_tree = mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_get(mlxsw_sp, &req_prefix_usage, - proto, true); + proto); if (IS_ERR(lpm_tree)) { err = PTR_ERR(lpm_tree); goto err_tree_get; @@ -463,7 +459,7 @@ mlxsw_sp_vr_lpm_tree_check(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct mlxsw_sp_vr *vr, return 0; new_tree = mlxsw_sp_lpm_tree_get(mlxsw_sp, req_prefix_usage, - vr->proto, false); + vr->proto); if (IS_ERR(new_tree)) { /* We failed to get a tree according to the required * prefix usage. However, the current tree might be still good -- 2.39.5