From 3854a771821c970065e3203a0b40ddc4101538cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:47:29 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] __exit_signal: don't take rcu lock There is no reason for rcu_read_lock() in __exit_signal(). tsk->sighand can only be changed if tsk does exec, obviously this is not possible. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Roland McGrath Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/exit.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index 93d2711b9381..a7799d8a6404 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk) BUG_ON(!sig); BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&sig->count)); - rcu_read_lock(); sighand = rcu_dereference(tsk->sighand); spin_lock(&sighand->siglock); @@ -136,7 +135,6 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk) tsk->signal = NULL; tsk->sighand = NULL; spin_unlock(&sighand->siglock); - rcu_read_unlock(); __cleanup_sighand(sighand); clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk,TIF_SIGPENDING); -- 2.39.5