From 5216d530bbd8581c927b250a11533c2a31b57510 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fengguang Wu Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:55:35 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Mark __lockdep_count_forward_deps() as static There are new Sparse warnings: >> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1235:15: sparse: symbol '__lockdep_count_forward_deps' was not declared. Should it be static? >> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1261:15: sparse: symbol '__lockdep_count_backward_deps' was not declared. Should it be static? Please consider folding the attached diff :-) Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/527d1787.ThzXGoUspZWehFDl\%fengguang.wu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 4e8e14c34e42..576ba756a32d 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ static int noop_count(struct lock_list *entry, void *data) return 0; } -unsigned long __lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_list *this) +static unsigned long __lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_list *this) { unsigned long count = 0; struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry); @@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_class *class) return ret; } -unsigned long __lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_list *this) +static unsigned long __lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_list *this) { unsigned long count = 0; struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry); -- 2.39.5