From 58d1b427148a3bd16e62f16558d2f45527727eb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:44:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Record preemption for selftests Put back the preemption counters lost in commit 22b7a426bbe1 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy") so that our selftests that assert no preemption took place continue to function. v2: But a timeslice is only a "soft" preemption! Fixes: 22b7a426bbe1 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Mika Kuoppala Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190710064454.682-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c index 19ce8eb5e5c9..270ef417dd1a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c @@ -921,6 +921,11 @@ enable_timeslice(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) return last && need_timeslice(engine, last); } +static void record_preemption(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists) +{ + (void)I915_SELFTEST_ONLY(execlists->preempt_hang.count++); +} + static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) { struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists; @@ -989,6 +994,8 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) last->fence.seqno, last->sched.attr.priority, execlists->queue_priority_hint); + record_preemption(execlists); + /* * Don't let the RING_HEAD advance past the breadcrumb * as we unwind (and until we resubmit) so that we do -- 2.39.5