From 642c2d671ceff40e9453203ea0c66e991e11e249 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:56:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] perf: Fix PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD deadlock Dmitry reported a fairly silly recursive lock deadlock for PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD, fix this by explicitly doing the inactive part of __perf_event_period() instead of calling that function. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Cc: Alexander Potapenko Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Eric Dumazet Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Kostya Serebryany Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Sasha Levin Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Fixes: c7999c6f3fed ("perf: Fix PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD migration race") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151130115615.GJ17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/events/core.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 5854fcf7f05a..49a5118f3564 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -4225,7 +4225,14 @@ retry: goto retry; } - __perf_event_period(&pe); + if (event->attr.freq) { + event->attr.sample_freq = value; + } else { + event->attr.sample_period = value; + event->hw.sample_period = value; + } + + local64_set(&event->hw.period_left, 0); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock); return 0; -- 2.39.5