From 6b5b635408a9062a1948a7a8151b13a4dde41df8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vinay Kumar Yadav Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:17:48 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] ch_ktls: do not send snd_una update to TCB in middle BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926999 commit e8a4155567b3c903f49cbf89b8017e9cc22c4fe4 upstream. snd_una update should not be done when the same skb is being sent out.chcr_short_record_handler() sends it again even though SND_UNA update is already sent for the skb in chcr_ktls_xmit(), which causes mismatch in un-acked TCP seq number, later causes problem in sending out complete record. Fixes: 429765a149f1 ("chcr: handle partial end part of a record") Signed-off-by: Vinay Kumar Yadav Signed-off-by: Rohit Maheshwari Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader --- .../chelsio/inline_crypto/ch_ktls/chcr_ktls.c | 53 ------------------- 1 file changed, 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/ch_ktls/chcr_ktls.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/ch_ktls/chcr_ktls.c index 4e7b4c7fddf9..3a50d5a62ace 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/ch_ktls/chcr_ktls.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/ch_ktls/chcr_ktls.c @@ -1649,54 +1649,6 @@ static void chcr_ktls_copy_record_in_skb(struct sk_buff *nskb, refcount_add(nskb->truesize, &nskb->sk->sk_wmem_alloc); } -/* - * chcr_ktls_update_snd_una: Reset the SEND_UNA. It will be done to avoid - * sending the same segment again. It will discard the segment which is before - * the current tx max. - * @tx_info - driver specific tls info. - * @q - TX queue. - * return: NET_TX_OK/NET_XMIT_DROP. - */ -static int chcr_ktls_update_snd_una(struct chcr_ktls_info *tx_info, - struct sge_eth_txq *q) -{ - struct fw_ulptx_wr *wr; - unsigned int ndesc; - int credits; - void *pos; - u32 len; - - len = sizeof(*wr) + roundup(CHCR_SET_TCB_FIELD_LEN, 16); - ndesc = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, 64); - - credits = chcr_txq_avail(&q->q) - ndesc; - if (unlikely(credits < 0)) { - chcr_eth_txq_stop(q); - return NETDEV_TX_BUSY; - } - - pos = &q->q.desc[q->q.pidx]; - - wr = pos; - /* ULPTX wr */ - wr->op_to_compl = htonl(FW_WR_OP_V(FW_ULPTX_WR)); - wr->cookie = 0; - /* fill len in wr field */ - wr->flowid_len16 = htonl(FW_WR_LEN16_V(DIV_ROUND_UP(len, 16))); - - pos += sizeof(*wr); - - pos = chcr_write_cpl_set_tcb_ulp(tx_info, q, tx_info->tid, pos, - TCB_SND_UNA_RAW_W, - TCB_SND_UNA_RAW_V(TCB_SND_UNA_RAW_M), - TCB_SND_UNA_RAW_V(0), 0); - - chcr_txq_advance(&q->q, ndesc); - cxgb4_ring_tx_db(tx_info->adap, &q->q, ndesc); - - return 0; -} - /* * chcr_end_part_handler: This handler will handle the record which * is complete or if record's end part is received. T6 adapter has a issue that @@ -1897,11 +1849,6 @@ static int chcr_short_record_handler(struct chcr_ktls_info *tx_info, /* reset tcp_seq as per the prior_data_required len */ tcp_seq -= prior_data_len; } - /* reset snd una, so the middle record won't send the already - * sent part. - */ - if (chcr_ktls_update_snd_una(tx_info, q)) - goto out; atomic64_inc(&tx_info->adap->ch_ktls_stats.ktls_tx_middle_pkts); } else { atomic64_inc(&tx_info->adap->ch_ktls_stats.ktls_tx_start_pkts); -- 2.39.2