From b80b549c3520b31d3bbc4b36e37e0a5102da0b94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:41:38 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: re-order ocfs2_empty_dir checks ocfs2_empty_dir() is far more expensive than checking link count. Since both need to be checked at the same time, we can improve performance by checking link count first. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c index 67113cfddc9b..58c318d2f061 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/namei.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/namei.c @@ -834,10 +834,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *dir, child_locked = 1; if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) { - if (!ocfs2_empty_dir(inode)) { - status = -ENOTEMPTY; - goto leave; - } else if (inode->i_nlink != 2) { + if (inode->i_nlink != 2 || !ocfs2_empty_dir(inode)) { status = -ENOTEMPTY; goto leave; } @@ -1280,8 +1277,8 @@ static int ocfs2_rename(struct inode *old_dir, if (target_exists) { if (S_ISDIR(new_inode->i_mode)) { - if (!ocfs2_empty_dir(new_inode) || - new_inode->i_nlink != 2) { + if (new_inode->i_nlink != 2 || + !ocfs2_empty_dir(new_inode)) { status = -ENOTEMPTY; goto bail; } -- 2.39.2