From fbf1c41fc0f4d3574ac2377245efd666c1fa3075 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Hutchings Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 01:18:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Fix flag collision Commit 0a94efb5acbb ("workqueue: implicit ordered attribute should be overridable") introduced a __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT flag but gave it the same value as __WQ_LEGACY. I don't believe these were intended to mean the same thing, so renumber __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT. Fixes: 0a94efb5acbb ("workqueue: implicit ordered attribute should be ...") Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.13 Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo --- include/linux/workqueue.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h index db6dc9dc0482..1c49431f3121 100644 --- a/include/linux/workqueue.h +++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h @@ -323,8 +323,8 @@ enum { __WQ_DRAINING = 1 << 16, /* internal: workqueue is draining */ __WQ_ORDERED = 1 << 17, /* internal: workqueue is ordered */ - __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT = 1 << 18, /* internal: alloc_ordered_workqueue() */ __WQ_LEGACY = 1 << 18, /* internal: create*_workqueue() */ + __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT = 1 << 19, /* internal: alloc_ordered_workqueue() */ WQ_MAX_ACTIVE = 512, /* I like 512, better ideas? */ WQ_MAX_UNBOUND_PER_CPU = 4, /* 4 * #cpus for unbound wq */ -- 2.39.5