From 56fd2fa44cc5de7db102e1daa9d994e262d48df5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: xli24 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 07:22:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Refine the comments to describe inconsistency between code and spec. git-svn-id: https://edk2.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/edk2/trunk/edk2@8830 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524 --- IntelFrameworkPkg/Include/Ppi/BlockIo.h | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/IntelFrameworkPkg/Include/Ppi/BlockIo.h b/IntelFrameworkPkg/Include/Ppi/BlockIo.h index 7b5d4dc183..0134776ced 100644 --- a/IntelFrameworkPkg/Include/Ppi/BlockIo.h +++ b/IntelFrameworkPkg/Include/Ppi/BlockIo.h @@ -52,8 +52,11 @@ typedef enum { /// /// Inconsistent with specification here: -/// PEI_BLOCK_IO_MEDIA has been changed to EFI_PEI_BLOCK_IO_MEDIA, because -/// "EFI_" prefix is missing in spec due to typo. +/// PEI_BLOCK_IO_MEDIA has been changed to EFI_PEI_BLOCK_IO_MEDIA. +/// Inconsistency exists in Framework Recovery Specification, where all referrences to this +/// structure name are with the "EFI_" prefix, except for the definition which is without "EFI_". +/// So the name of PEI_BLOCK_IO_MEDIA is taken as the exception caused by mistake, and +/// EFI_PEI_BLOCK_IO_MEDIA is used to comply with most part of the specification. /// typedef struct { EFI_PEI_BLOCK_DEVICE_TYPE DeviceType; -- 2.39.2