-[[chapter-ha-manager]]
+[[chapter_ha_manager]]
ifdef::manvolnum[]
-PVE({manvolnum})
-================
-include::attributes.txt[]
+ha-manager(1)
+=============
+:pve-toplevel:
NAME
----
ha-manager - Proxmox VE HA Manager
-SYNOPSYS
+SYNOPSIS
--------
include::ha-manager.1-synopsis.adoc[]
DESCRIPTION
-----------
endif::manvolnum[]
-
ifndef::manvolnum[]
High Availability
=================
-include::attributes.txt[]
+:pve-toplevel:
endif::manvolnum[]
-'ha-manager' handles management of user-defined cluster services. This
-includes handling of user requests including service start, service
-disable, service relocate, and service restart. The cluster resource
-manager daemon also handles restarting and relocating services in the
-event of failures.
+Our modern society depends heavily on information provided by
+computers over the network. Mobile devices amplified that dependency,
+because people can access the network any time from anywhere. If you
+provide such services, it is very important that they are available
+most of the time.
+
+We can mathematically define the availability as the ratio of (A) the
+total time a service is capable of being used during a given interval
+to (B) the length of the interval. It is normally expressed as a
+percentage of uptime in a given year.
+
+.Availability - Downtime per Year
+[width="60%",cols="<d,d",options="header"]
+|===========================================================
+|Availability % |Downtime per year
+|99 |3.65 days
+|99.9 |8.76 hours
+|99.99 |52.56 minutes
+|99.999 |5.26 minutes
+|99.9999 |31.5 seconds
+|99.99999 |3.15 seconds
+|===========================================================
+
+There are several ways to increase availability. The most elegant
+solution is to rewrite your software, so that you can run it on
+several host at the same time. The software itself need to have a way
+to detect errors and do failover. This is relatively easy if you just
+want to serve read-only web pages. But in general this is complex, and
+sometimes impossible because you cannot modify the software
+yourself. The following solutions works without modifying the
+software:
+
+* Use reliable ``server'' components
++
+NOTE: Computer components with same functionality can have varying
+reliability numbers, depending on the component quality. Most vendors
+sell components with higher reliability as ``server'' components -
+usually at higher price.
+
+* Eliminate single point of failure (redundant components)
+** use an uninterruptible power supply (UPS)
+** use redundant power supplies on the main boards
+** use ECC-RAM
+** use redundant network hardware
+** use RAID for local storage
+** use distributed, redundant storage for VM data
+
+* Reduce downtime
+** rapidly accessible administrators (24/7)
+** availability of spare parts (other nodes in a {pve} cluster)
+** automatic error detection (provided by `ha-manager`)
+** automatic failover (provided by `ha-manager`)
+
+Virtualization environments like {pve} make it much easier to reach
+high availability because they remove the ``hardware'' dependency. They
+also support to setup and use redundant storage and network
+devices. So if one host fail, you can simply start those services on
+another host within your cluster.
+
+Even better, {pve} provides a software stack called `ha-manager`,
+which can do that automatically for you. It is able to automatically
+detect errors and do automatic failover.
+
+{pve} `ha-manager` works like an ``automated'' administrator. First, you
+configure what resources (VMs, containers, ...) it should
+manage. `ha-manager` then observes correct functionality, and handles
+service failover to another node in case of errors. `ha-manager` can
+also handle normal user requests which may start, stop, relocate and
+migrate a service.
+
+But high availability comes at a price. High quality components are
+more expensive, and making them redundant duplicates the costs at
+least. Additional spare parts increase costs further. So you should
+carefully calculate the benefits, and compare with those additional
+costs.
+
+TIP: Increasing availability from 99% to 99.9% is relatively
+simply. But increasing availability from 99.9999% to 99.99999% is very
+hard and costly. `ha-manager` has typical error detection and failover
+times of about 2 minutes, so you can get no more than 99.999%
+availability.
+
+
+Requirements
+------------
+
+You must meet the following requirements before you start with HA:
+
+* at least three cluster nodes (to get reliable quorum)
+
+* shared storage for VMs and containers
+
+* hardware redundancy (everywhere)
+
+* use reliable “server” components
+
+* hardware watchdog - if not available we fall back to the
+ linux kernel software watchdog (`softdog`)
+
+* optional hardware fencing devices
+
+
+[[ha_manager_resources]]
+Resources
+---------
+
+We call the primary management unit handled by `ha-manager` a
+resource. A resource (also called ``service'') is uniquely
+identified by a service ID (SID), which consists of the resource type
+and an type specific ID, e.g.: `vm:100`. That example would be a
+resource of type `vm` (virtual machine) with the ID 100.
-HOW IT WORKS
+For now we have two important resources types - virtual machines and
+containers. One basic idea here is that we can bundle related software
+into such VM or container, so there is no need to compose one big
+service from other services, like it was done with `rgmanager`. In
+general, a HA managed resource should not depend on other resources.
+
+
+How It Works
------------
-The local resource manager ('pve-ha-lrm') is started as a daemon on
-each node at system start and waits until the HA cluster is quorate
-and locks are working. After initialization, the LRM determines which
-services are enabled and starts them. Also the watchdog gets
-initialized.
+This section provides a detailed description of the {PVE} HA manager
+internals. It describes all involved daemons and how they work
+together. To provide HA, two daemons run on each node:
+
+`pve-ha-lrm`::
+
+The local resource manager (LRM), which controls the services running on
+the local node. It reads the requested states for its services from
+the current manager status file and executes the respective commands.
+
+`pve-ha-crm`::
+
+The cluster resource manager (CRM), which makes the cluster wide
+decisions. It sends commands to the LRM, processes the results,
+and moves resources to other nodes if something fails. The CRM also
+handles node fencing.
+
+
+.Locks in the LRM & CRM
+[NOTE]
+Locks are provided by our distributed configuration file system (pmxcfs).
+They are used to guarantee that each LRM is active once and working. As a
+LRM only executes actions when it holds its lock we can mark a failed node
+as fenced if we can acquire its lock. This lets us then recover any failed
+HA services securely without any interference from the now unknown failed node.
+This all gets supervised by the CRM which holds currently the manager master
+lock.
+
+
+Service States
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+[thumbnail="gui-ha-manager-status.png"]
+
+The CRM use a service state enumeration to record the current service
+state. We display this state on the GUI and you can query it using
+the `ha-manager` command line tool:
+
+----
+# ha-manager status
+quorum OK
+master elsa (active, Mon Nov 21 07:23:29 2016)
+lrm elsa (active, Mon Nov 21 07:23:22 2016)
+service ct:100 (elsa, stopped)
+service ct:102 (elsa, started)
+service vm:501 (elsa, started)
+----
+
+Here is the list of possible states:
+
+stopped::
+
+Service is stopped (confirmed by LRM). If the LRM detects a stopped
+service is still running, it will stop it again.
+
+request_stop::
+
+Service should be stopped. The CRM waits for confirmation from the
+LRM.
+
+started::
+
+Service is active an LRM should start it ASAP if not already running.
+If the Service fails and is detected to be not running the LRM
+restarts it
+(see xref:ha_manager_start_failure_policy[Start Failure Policy]).
+
+fence::
+
+Wait for node fencing (service node is not inside quorate cluster
+partition). As soon as node gets fenced successfully the service will
+be recovered to another node, if possible
+(see xref:ha_manager_fencing[Fencing]).
+
+freeze::
+
+Do not touch the service state. We use this state while we reboot a
+node, or when we restart the LRM daemon
+(see xref:ha_manager_package_updates[Package Updates]).
-The cluster resource manager ('pve-ha-crm') starts on each node and
+migrate::
+
+Migrate service (live) to other node.
+
+error::
+
+Service is disabled because of LRM errors. Needs manual intervention
+(see xref:ha_manager_error_recovery[Error Recovery]).
+
+
+Local Resource Manager
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The local resource manager (`pve-ha-lrm`) is started as a daemon on
+boot and waits until the HA cluster is quorate and thus cluster wide
+locks are working.
+
+It can be in three states:
+
+wait for agent lock::
+
+The LRM waits for our exclusive lock. This is also used as idle state if no
+service is configured.
+
+active::
+
+The LRM holds its exclusive lock and has services configured.
+
+lost agent lock::
+
+The LRM lost its lock, this means a failure happened and quorum was lost.
+
+After the LRM gets in the active state it reads the manager status
+file in `/etc/pve/ha/manager_status` and determines the commands it
+has to execute for the services it owns.
+For each command a worker gets started, this workers are running in
+parallel and are limited to at most 4 by default. This default setting
+may be changed through the datacenter configuration key `max_worker`.
+When finished the worker process gets collected and its result saved for
+the CRM.
+
+.Maximum Concurrent Worker Adjustment Tips
+[NOTE]
+The default value of at most 4 concurrent workers may be unsuited for
+a specific setup. For example may 4 live migrations happen at the same
+time, which can lead to network congestions with slower networks and/or
+big (memory wise) services. Ensure that also in the worst case no congestion
+happens and lower the `max_worker` value if needed. In the contrary, if you
+have a particularly powerful high end setup you may also want to increase it.
+
+Each command requested by the CRM is uniquely identifiable by an UID, when
+the worker finished its result will be processed and written in the LRM
+status file `/etc/pve/nodes/<nodename>/lrm_status`. There the CRM may collect
+it and let its state machine - respective the commands output - act on it.
+
+The actions on each service between CRM and LRM are normally always synced.
+This means that the CRM requests a state uniquely marked by an UID, the LRM
+then executes this action *one time* and writes back the result, also
+identifiable by the same UID. This is needed so that the LRM does not
+executes an outdated command.
+With the exception of the `stop` and the `error` command,
+those two do not depend on the result produced and are executed
+always in the case of the stopped state and once in the case of
+the error state.
+
+.Read the Logs
+[NOTE]
+The HA Stack logs every action it makes. This helps to understand what
+and also why something happens in the cluster. Here its important to see
+what both daemons, the LRM and the CRM, did. You may use
+`journalctl -u pve-ha-lrm` on the node(s) where the service is and
+the same command for the pve-ha-crm on the node which is the current master.
+
+Cluster Resource Manager
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The cluster resource manager (`pve-ha-crm`) starts on each node and
waits there for the manager lock, which can only be held by one node
at a time. The node which successfully acquires the manager lock gets
-promoted to the CRM, it handles cluster wide actions like migrations
-and failures.
+promoted to the CRM master.
+
+It can be in three states:
+
+wait for agent lock::
+
+The CRM waits for our exclusive lock. This is also used as idle state if no
+service is configured
+
+active::
+
+The CRM holds its exclusive lock and has services configured
+
+lost agent lock::
+
+The CRM lost its lock, this means a failure happened and quorum was lost.
+
+It main task is to manage the services which are configured to be highly
+available and try to always enforce the requested state. For example, a
+service with the requested state 'started' will be started if its not
+already running. If it crashes it will be automatically started again.
+Thus the CRM dictates the actions which the LRM needs to execute.
When an node leaves the cluster quorum, its state changes to unknown.
If the current CRM then can secure the failed nodes lock, the services
When a cluster member determines that it is no longer in the cluster
quorum, the LRM waits for a new quorum to form. As long as there is no
quorum the node cannot reset the watchdog. This will trigger a reboot
-after 60 seconds.
+after the watchdog then times out, this happens after 60 seconds.
+
-CONFIGURATION
+Configuration
-------------
-The HA stack is well integrated int the Proxmox VE API2. So, for
-example, HA can be configured via 'ha-manager' or the PVE web
-interface, which both provide an easy to use tool.
+The HA stack is well integrated into the {pve} API. So, for example,
+HA can be configured via the `ha-manager` command line interface, or
+the {pve} web interface - both interfaces provide an easy way to
+manage HA. Automation tools can use the API directly.
-The resource configuration file can be located at
-'/etc/pve/ha/resources.cfg' and the group configuration file at
-'/etc/pve/ha/groups.cfg'. Use the provided tools to make changes,
-there shouldn't be any need to edit them manually.
+All HA configuration files are within `/etc/pve/ha/`, so they get
+automatically distributed to the cluster nodes, and all nodes share
+the same HA configuration.
-RESOURCES/SERVICES AGENTS
--------------------------
-A resource or also called service can be managed by the
-ha-manager. Currently we support virtual machines and container.
+[[ha_manager_resource_config]]
+Resources
+~~~~~~~~~
-GROUPS
-------
+[thumbnail="gui-ha-manager-resources-view.png"]
-A group is a collection of cluster nodes which a service may be bound to.
+The resource configuration file `/etc/pve/ha/resources.cfg` stores
+the list of resources managed by `ha-manager`. A resource configuration
+inside that list look like this:
-GROUP SETTINGS
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+----
+<type>: <name>
+ <property> <value>
+ ...
+----
-nodes::
+It starts with a resource type followed by a resource specific name,
+separated with colon. Together this forms the HA resource ID, which is
+used by all `ha-manager` commands to uniquely identify a resource
+(example: `vm:100` or `ct:101`). The next lines contain additional
+properties:
-list of group node members
+include::ha-resources-opts.adoc[]
-restricted::
+Here is a real world example with one VM and one container. As you see,
+the syntax of those files is really simple, so it is even posiible to
+read or edit those files using your favorite editor:
-resources bound to this group may only run on nodes defined by the
-group. If no group node member is available the resource will be
-placed in the stopped state.
+.Configuration Example (`/etc/pve/ha/resources.cfg`)
+----
+vm: 501
+ state started
+ max_relocate 2
-nofailback::
+ct: 102
+ # Note: use default settings for everything
+----
-the resource won't automatically fail back when a more preferred node
-(re)joins the cluster.
+[thumbnail="gui-ha-manager-add-resource.png"]
+Above config was generated using the `ha-manager` command line tool:
-RECOVERY POLICY
----------------
+----
+# ha-manager add vm:501 --state started --max_relocate 2
+# ha-manager add ct:102
+----
+
+
+[[ha_manager_groups]]
+Groups
+~~~~~~
+
+[thumbnail="gui-ha-manager-groups-view.png"]
+
+The HA group configuration file `/etc/pve/ha/groups.cfg` is used to
+define groups of cluster nodes. A resource can be restricted to run
+only on the members of such group. A group configuration look like
+this:
+
+----
+group: <group>
+ nodes <node_list>
+ <property> <value>
+ ...
+----
+
+include::ha-groups-opts.adoc[]
+
+[thumbnail="gui-ha-manager-add-group.png"]
+
+A commom requirement is that a resource should run on a specific
+node. Usually the resource is able to run on other nodes, so you can define
+an unrestricted group with a single member:
+
+----
+# ha-manager groupadd prefer_node1 --nodes node1
+----
+
+For bigger clusters, it makes sense to define a more detailed failover
+behavior. For example, you may want to run a set of services on
+`node1` if possible. If `node1` is not available, you want to run them
+equally splitted on `node2` and `node3`. If those nodes also fail the
+services should run on `node4`. To achieve this you could set the node
+list to:
+
+----
+# ha-manager groupadd mygroup1 -nodes "node1:2,node2:1,node3:1,node4"
+----
+
+Another use case is if a resource uses other resources only available
+on specific nodes, lets say `node1` and `node2`. We need to make sure
+that HA manager does not use other nodes, so we need to create a
+restricted group with said nodes:
+
+----
+# ha-manager groupadd mygroup2 -nodes "node1,node2" -restricted
+----
+
+Above commands created the following group configuration fils:
+
+.Configuration Example (`/etc/pve/ha/groups.cfg`)
+----
+group: prefer_node1
+ nodes node1
+
+group: mygroup1
+ nodes node2:1,node4,node1:2,node3:1
+
+group: mygroup2
+ nodes node2,node1
+ restricted 1
+----
+
+
+The `nofailback` options is mostly useful to avoid unwanted resource
+movements during administartion tasks. For example, if you need to
+migrate a service to a node which hasn't the highest priority in the
+group, you need to tell the HA manager to not move this service
+instantly back by setting the `nofailback` option.
+
+Another scenario is when a service was fenced and it got recovered to
+another node. The admin tries to repair the fenced node and brings it
+up online again to investigate the failure cause and check if it runs
+stable again. Setting the `nofailback` flag prevents that the
+recovered services move straight back to the fenced node.
+
+
+[[ha_manager_fencing]]
+Fencing
+-------
+
+On node failures, fencing ensures that the erroneous node is
+guaranteed to be offline. This is required to make sure that no
+resource runs twice when it gets recovered on another node. This is a
+really important task, because without, it would not be possible to
+recover a resource on another node.
+
+If a node would not get fenced, it would be in an unknown state where
+it may have still access to shared resources. This is really
+dangerous! Imagine that every network but the storage one broke. Now,
+while not reachable from the public network, the VM still runs and
+writes to the shared storage.
+
+If we then simply start up this VM on another node, we would get a
+dangerous race conditions because we write from both nodes. Such
+condition can destroy all VM data and the whole VM could be rendered
+unusable. The recovery could also fail if the storage protects from
+multiple mounts.
+
+
+How {pve} Fences
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+There are different methods to fence a node, for example, fence
+devices which cut off the power from the node or disable their
+communication completely. Those are often quite expensive and bring
+additional critical components into a system, because if they fail you
+cannot recover any service.
+
+We thus wanted to integrate a simpler fencing method, which does not
+require additional external hardware. This can be done using
+watchdog timers.
+
+.Possible Fencing Methods
+- external power switches
+- isolate nodes by disabling complete network traffic on the switch
+- self fencing using watchdog timers
+
+Watchdog timers are widely used in critical and dependable systems
+since the beginning of micro controllers. They are often independent
+and simple integrated circuits which are used to detect and recover
+from computer malfunctions.
+
+During normal operation, `ha-manager` regularly resets the watchdog
+timer to prevent it from elapsing. If, due to a hardware fault or
+program error, the computer fails to reset the watchdog, the timer
+will elapse and triggers a reset of the whole server (reboot).
+
+Recent server motherboards often include such hardware watchdogs, but
+these need to be configured. If no watchdog is available or
+configured, we fall back to the Linux Kernel 'softdog'. While still
+reliable, it is not independent of the servers hardware, and thus has
+a lower reliability than a hardware watchdog.
+
+
+Configure Hardware Watchdog
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+By default, all hardware watchdog modules are blocked for security
+reasons. They are like a loaded gun if not correctly initialized. To
+enable a hardware watchdog, you need to specify the module to load in
+'/etc/default/pve-ha-manager', for example:
+
+----
+# select watchdog module (default is softdog)
+WATCHDOG_MODULE=iTCO_wdt
+----
+
+This configuration is read by the 'watchdog-mux' service, which load
+the specified module at startup.
+
+
+Recover Fenced Services
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+After a node failed and its fencing was successful, the CRM tries to
+move services from the failed node to nodes which are still online.
-There are two service recover policy settings which can be configured
+The selection of nodes, on which those services gets recovered, is
+influenced by the resource `group` settings, the list of currently active
+nodes, and their respective active service count.
+
+The CRM first builds a set out of the intersection between user selected
+nodes (from `group` setting) and available nodes. It then choose the
+subset of nodes with the highest priority, and finally select the node
+with the lowest active service count. This minimizes the possibility
+of an overloaded node.
+
+CAUTION: On node failure, the CRM distributes services to the
+remaining nodes. This increase the service count on those nodes, and
+can lead to high load, especially on small clusters. Please design
+your cluster so that it can handle such worst case scenarios.
+
+
+[[ha_manager_start_failure_policy]]
+Start Failure Policy
+---------------------
+
+The start failure policy comes in effect if a service failed to start on a
+node once ore more times. It can be used to configure how often a restart
+should be triggered on the same node and how often a service should be
+relocated so that it gets a try to be started on another node.
+The aim of this policy is to circumvent temporary unavailability of shared
+resources on a specific node. For example, if a shared storage isn't available
+on a quorate node anymore, e.g. network problems, but still on other nodes,
+the relocate policy allows then that the service gets started nonetheless.
+
+There are two service start recover policy settings which can be configured
specific for each resource.
max_restart::
-maximal number of tries to restart an failed service on the actual
+Maximum number of tries to restart an failed service on the actual
node. The default is set to one.
max_relocate::
-maximal number of tries to relocate the service to a different node.
+Maximum number of tries to relocate the service to a different node.
A relocate only happens after the max_restart value is exceeded on the
actual node. The default is set to one.
-Note that the relocate count state will only reset to zero when the
+NOTE: The relocate count state will only reset to zero when the
service had at least one successful start. That means if a service is
-re-enabled without fixing the error only the restart policy gets
+re-started without fixing the error only the restart policy gets
repeated.
-ERROR RECOVERY
+
+[[ha_manager_error_recovery]]
+Error Recovery
--------------
If after all tries the service state could not be recovered it gets
placed in an error state. In this state the service won't get touched
-by the HA stack anymore. To recover from this state you should follow
-these steps:
+by the HA stack anymore. The only way out is disabling a service:
+
+----
+# ha-manager set vm:100 --state disabled
+----
+
+This can also be done in the web interface.
+
+To recover from the error state you should do the following:
-* bring the resource back into an safe and consistent state (e.g:
-killing its process)
+* bring the resource back into a safe and consistent state (e.g.:
+kill its process if the service could not be stopped)
-* disable the ha resource to place it in an stopped state
+* disable the resource to remove the error flag
* fix the error which led to this failures
-* *after* you fixed all errors you may enable the service again
+* *after* you fixed all errors you may request that the service starts again
-SERVICE OPERATIONS
-------------------
+[[ha_manager_package_updates]]
+Package Updates
+---------------
-This are how the basic user-initiated service operations (via
-'ha-manager') work.
+When updating the ha-manager you should do one node after the other, never
+all at once for various reasons. First, while we test our software
+thoughtfully, a bug affecting your specific setup cannot totally be ruled out.
+Upgrading one node after the other and checking the functionality of each node
+after finishing the update helps to recover from an eventual problems, while
+updating all could render you in a broken cluster state and is generally not
+good practice.
-enable::
+Also, the {pve} HA stack uses a request acknowledge protocol to perform
+actions between the cluster and the local resource manager. For restarting,
+the LRM makes a request to the CRM to freeze all its services. This prevents
+that they get touched by the Cluster during the short time the LRM is restarting.
+After that the LRM may safely close the watchdog during a restart.
+Such a restart happens on a update and as already stated a active master
+CRM is needed to acknowledge the requests from the LRM, if this is not the case
+the update process can be too long which, in the worst case, may result in
+a watchdog reset.
-the service will be started by the LRM if not already running.
-disable::
+Node Maintenance
+----------------
-the service will be stopped by the LRM if running.
+It is sometimes possible to shutdown or reboot a node to do
+maintenance tasks. Either to replace hardware, or simply to install a
+new kernel image.
-migrate/relocate::
-the service will be relocated (live) to another node.
+Shutdown
+~~~~~~~~
-remove::
+A shutdown ('poweroff') is usually done if the node is planned to stay
+down for some time. The LRM stops all managed services in that
+case. This means that other nodes will take over those service
+afterwards.
-the service will be removed from the HA managed resource list. Its
-current state will not be touched.
+NOTE: Recent hardware has large amounts of RAM. So we stop all
+resources, then restart them to avoid online migration of all that
+RAM. If you want to use online migration, you need to invoke that
+manually before you shutdown the node.
-start/stop::
-start and stop commands can be issued to the resource specific tools
-(like 'qm' or 'pct'), they will forward the request to the
-'ha-manager' which then will execute the action and set the resulting
-service state (enabled, disabled).
+Reboot
+~~~~~~
+Node reboots are initiated with the 'reboot' command. This is usually
+done after installing a new kernel. Please note that this is different
+from ``shutdown'', because the node immediately starts again.
-SERVICE STATES
---------------
+The LRM tells the CRM that it wants to restart, and waits until the
+CRM puts all resources into the `freeze` state (same mechanism is used
+for xref:ha_manager_package_updates[Pakage Updates]). This prevents
+that those resources are moved to other nodes. Instead, the CRM start
+the resources after the reboot on the same node.
-stopped::
-Service is stopped (confirmed by LRM)
+Manual Resource Movement
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-request_stop::
+Last but not least, you can also move resources manually to other
+nodes before you shutdown or restart a node. The advantage is that you
+have full control, and you can decide if you want to use online
+migration or not.
-Service should be stopped. Waiting for confirmation from LRM.
+NOTE: Please do not 'kill' services like `pve-ha-crm`, `pve-ha-lrm` or
+`watchdog-mux`. They manage and use the watchdog, so this can result
+in a node reboot.
-started::
-Service is active an LRM should start it ASAP if not already running.
+[[ha_manager_service_operations]]
+Service Operations
+------------------
-fence::
+This are how the basic user-initiated service operations (via
+`ha-manager`) work.
-Wait for node fencing (service node is not inside quorate cluster
-partition).
+set state::
-freeze::
+Request the service state.
+See xref:ha_manager_resource_config[Resource Configuration] for possible
+request states.
++
+----
+# ha-manager set SID -state REQUEST_STATE
+----
-Do not touch the service state. We use this state while we reboot a
-node, or when we restart the LRM daemon.
+disable::
-migrate::
+The service will be placed in the stopped state, even if it was in the error
+state. The service will not be recovered on a node failure and will stay
+stopped while it is in this state.
-Migrate service (live) to other node.
+migrate/relocate::
-error::
+The service will be relocated (live) to another node.
+
+remove::
-Service disabled because of LRM errors. Needs manual intervention.
+The service will be removed from the HA managed resource list. Its
+current state will not be touched.
+
+start/stop::
+
+`start` and `stop` commands can be issued to the resource specific tools
+(like `qm` or `pct`), they will forward the request to the
+`ha-manager` which then will execute the action and set the resulting
+service state (enabled, disabled).
ifdef::manvolnum[]
projects / pve-docs.git / blobdiff