]>
Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
1da177e4 LT |
1 | #ifndef FWH_LOCK_H |
2 | #define FWH_LOCK_H | |
3 | ||
4 | ||
5 | enum fwh_lock_state { | |
6 | FWH_UNLOCKED = 0, | |
7 | FWH_DENY_WRITE = 1, | |
8 | FWH_IMMUTABLE = 2, | |
9 | FWH_DENY_READ = 4, | |
10 | }; | |
11 | ||
12 | struct fwh_xxlock_thunk { | |
13 | enum fwh_lock_state val; | |
14 | flstate_t state; | |
15 | }; | |
16 | ||
17 | ||
18 | #define FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK ((struct fwh_xxlock_thunk){ FWH_DENY_WRITE, FL_LOCKING}) | |
19 | #define FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK ((struct fwh_xxlock_thunk){ FWH_UNLOCKED, FL_UNLOCKING}) | |
20 | ||
21 | /* | |
22 | * This locking/unlock is specific to firmware hub parts. Only one | |
23 | * is known that supports the Intel command set. Firmware | |
24 | * hub parts cannot be interleaved as they are on the LPC bus | |
25 | * so this code has not been tested with interleaved chips, | |
26 | * and will likely fail in that context. | |
27 | */ | |
28 | static int fwh_xxlock_oneblock(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, | |
29 | unsigned long adr, int len, void *thunk) | |
30 | { | |
31 | struct cfi_private *cfi = map->fldrv_priv; | |
32 | struct fwh_xxlock_thunk *xxlt = (struct fwh_xxlock_thunk *)thunk; | |
33 | int ret; | |
34 | ||
35 | /* Refuse the operation if the we cannot look behind the chip */ | |
36 | if (chip->start < 0x400000) { | |
37 | DEBUG( MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL3, | |
38 | "MTD %s(): chip->start: %lx wanted >= 0x400000\n", | |
39 | __func__, chip->start ); | |
40 | return -EIO; | |
41 | } | |
42 | /* | |
43 | * lock block registers: | |
44 | * - on 64k boundariesand | |
45 | * - bit 1 set high | |
46 | * - block lock registers are 4MiB lower - overflow subtract (danger) | |
47 | * | |
48 | * The address manipulation is first done on the logical address | |
49 | * which is 0 at the start of the chip, and then the offset of | |
50 | * the individual chip is addted to it. Any other order a weird | |
51 | * map offset could cause problems. | |
52 | */ | |
53 | adr = (adr & ~0xffffUL) | 0x2; | |
54 | adr += chip->start - 0x400000; | |
55 | ||
56 | /* | |
57 | * This is easy because these are writes to registers and not writes | |
58 | * to flash memory - that means that we don't have to check status | |
59 | * and timeout. | |
60 | */ | |
61 | cfi_spin_lock(chip->mutex); | |
62 | ret = get_chip(map, chip, adr, FL_LOCKING); | |
63 | if (ret) { | |
64 | cfi_spin_unlock(chip->mutex); | |
65 | return ret; | |
66 | } | |
67 | ||
68 | chip->state = xxlt->state; | |
69 | map_write(map, CMD(xxlt->val), adr); | |
70 | ||
71 | /* Done and happy. */ | |
72 | chip->state = FL_READY; | |
73 | put_chip(map, chip, adr); | |
74 | cfi_spin_unlock(chip->mutex); | |
75 | return 0; | |
76 | } | |
77 | ||
78 | ||
79 | static int fwh_lock_varsize(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len) | |
80 | { | |
81 | int ret; | |
82 | ||
83 | ret = cfi_varsize_frob(mtd, fwh_xxlock_oneblock, ofs, len, | |
84 | (void *)&FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK); | |
85 | ||
86 | return ret; | |
87 | } | |
88 | ||
89 | ||
90 | static int fwh_unlock_varsize(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len) | |
91 | { | |
92 | int ret; | |
93 | ||
94 | ret = cfi_varsize_frob(mtd, fwh_xxlock_oneblock, ofs, len, | |
95 | (void *)&FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK); | |
96 | ||
97 | return ret; | |
98 | } | |
99 | ||
100 | static void fixup_use_fwh_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, void *param) | |
101 | { | |
102 | printk(KERN_NOTICE "using fwh lock/unlock method\n"); | |
103 | /* Setup for the chips with the fwh lock method */ | |
104 | mtd->lock = fwh_lock_varsize; | |
105 | mtd->unlock = fwh_unlock_varsize; | |
106 | } | |
107 | #endif /* FWH_LOCK_H */ |