]> git.proxmox.com Git - mirror_frr.git/blob - COMMUNITY.md
doc: Fixed a few typos on Building Doc's, Changed Tab's to spaces and limited line...
[mirror_frr.git] / COMMUNITY.md
1 # Developing for PROJECT (DRAFT)
2
3 [TOC]
4
5 ## Git Structure
6
7 The master Git for PROJECT resides on Github at
8 [https://github.com/PROJECT/XXX](https://github.com/PROJECT/XXX)
9
10 ![git branches continually merging to the left from 3 lanes; float-right](doc/git_branches.svg
11 "git branch mechanics")
12
13 There are 3 main branches for development and a release branch for each
14 major release.
15
16 New contributions are done against the head of the Develop branch. The CI
17 systems will pick up the Github Pull Requests or the new patch from
18 Patchwork, run some basic build and functional tests and will merge them
19 into the branch automatically on success.
20
21 Code on the develop branch will then be further tested and reviewed by the
22 community and merged to master on a regular interval.
23
24 For each major release (1.0, 1.1 etc) a new release branch is created based
25 on the master.
26
27
28 ## Programming language, Tools and Libraries
29
30 The core of PROJECT is written in C (gcc or clang supported). A few
31 non-essential scripts are implemented in Perl and Python. PROJECT requires
32 the following tools to build distribution packages: automake, autoconf,
33 texinfo, libtool and gawk and various libraries (i.e. libpam and libjson-c).
34
35 If your contribution requires a new library or other tool, then please
36 highlight this in your description of the change. Also make sure it’s
37 supported by all PROJECT platform OSes or provide a way to build without the
38 library (potentially without the new feature) on the other platforms.
39
40 Documentation should be written in Tex (.texi) or Markdown (.md) format with
41 preference on Markdown.
42
43
44 ## Before Submitting your changes
45
46 * Format code (see [Code Styling requirements](#code-styling-requirements))
47 * Verify and acknowledge license (see [License for contributions](#license-for-contributions))
48 * Test building with various configurations:
49 * `buildtest.sh`
50 * Verify building source distribution:
51 * `make dist` (and try rebuilding from the resulting tar file)
52 * Run DejaGNU unit tests:
53 * `make test`
54 * Document Regression Runs and plans for continued maintenance of the feature
55
56 ### Changelog
57
58 The changelog will be the base for the release notes. A changelog entry for
59 your changes is usually not required and will be added based on your commit
60 messages by the maintainers. However, you are free to include an update to
61 the changelog with some better description. The changelog will be the base
62 for the release notes.
63
64
65 ## Submitting Patches and Enhancements
66
67 ### License for contributions
68
69 PROJECT is under a “GPLv2 or later” license. Any code submitted must be
70 released under the same license (preferred) or any license which allows
71 redistribution under this GPLv2 license (eg MIT License).
72
73 ### Signed-off required
74
75 Submissions to PROJECT require a “Signed-off” in the patch or git commit.
76 We follow the same standard as the Linux Kernel Development.
77
78 > Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
79 >
80 > By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
81 >
82 > (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
83 > have the right to submit it under the open source license
84 > indicated in the file; or
85 >
86 > (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
87 > of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
88 > license and I have the right under that license to submit that
89 > work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
90 > by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
91 > permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
92 > in the file; or
93 >
94 > (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
95 > person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
96 > it.
97 >
98 > (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
99 > are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
100 > personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
101 > maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
102 > this project or the open source license(s) involved.
103
104 #### Using this Process
105
106 We have the same requirements for using the signed-off-by process as the Linux
107 kernel. In short, you need to include a signed-off-by tag in every patch:
108
109 * `Signed-off-by:` this is a developer's certification that he or she has the
110 right to submit the patch for inclusion into the project. It is an agreement to
111 the Developer's Certificate of Origin (above). Code without a proper signoff
112 cannot be merged into the mainline.
113
114 Please make sure to have a `Signed-off-by:` in each commit/patch or the patches
115 will be rejected until this is added.
116
117 If you are unfamiliar with this process, you should read the [official policy
118 at kernel.org](http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches) and
119 you might find this article about [participating in the Linux community on the
120 Linux Foundation
121 website](http://www.linuxfoundation.org/content/how-participate-linux-community-0)
122 to be a helpful resource.
123
124
125 ### Code submission - Github Pull Request (Strongly Preferred)
126
127 Preferred submission of code is by using a Github Pull Request against the
128 Develop branch. Code submitted by Pull Request will have an email generated to
129 the PROJECT-devel mailing list for review and the submission will be
130 automatically tested by one or more CI systems. Only after this test succeeds
131 (and the submission is based on the head of the develop branch), then it will
132 be automatically merged into the develop branch. In case of failed tests, it is
133 up to the submitter to either amend the request with further commits or close,
134 fix and create a new pull request.
135
136 Further (manual) code review and discussion happens after the merge into the
137 develop branch.
138
139
140 ### Code submission - Mailing Patch to PROJECT-Devel list
141
142 As an alternative submission, a patch can be mailed to the PROJECT-Devel
143 mailing list. Preferred way to send the patch is using git send-mail. Patches
144 received on the mailing list will be picked up by Patchwork and tested against
145 the latest develop branch. After a further ACK by someone on the mailing list,
146 the patch is then merged into the develop branch.
147
148 Further (manual) code review and discussion happens after the merge into the
149 develop branch.
150
151 #### Sending patch to mailing list
152
153 The recommended way to send the patch (or series of NN patches) to the list is
154 by using ‘git send-email’ as follows (assuming they are the most recent NN
155 commit(s) in your git history:
156
157 ```
158 git send-email -NN --annotate --to=XXX-Devel@XXX.org
159 ```
160
161 If your commits do not already contain a `Signed-off-by` line, then use the
162 following version to add it (after making sure to be able to agree to the
163 Developer Certificate of Origin as outlined above):
164
165 ```
166 git send-email -NN --annotate --signoff --to=XXX-Devel@XXX.org
167 ```
168
169 Submitting multi-commit patches as a Github Pull Request is strongly encouraged
170 and will allow your changes to merge faster
171
172
173 ## After submitting your changes
174
175 * Watch for Continuous Integration (CI) Test results
176 * You should automatically receive an email with the test results within
177 less than 2 hrs of the submission. If you don’t get the email, then check
178 status on the github pull request (if submitted by pull request) or on
179 Patchwork at
180 [https://patchwork.PROJECT.org](https://patchwork.PROJECT.org) (if
181 submitted as patch to mailing list).
182 * Please notify PROJECT-Devel mailing list if you think something doesn’t
183 work
184 * If the tests failed:
185 * In general, expect the community to ignore the submission until the tests
186 pass.
187 * It is up to you to fix and resubmit.
188 * This includes fixing existing dejagnu (“make test”) tests if your
189 changes broke or changed them.
190 * It also includes fixing distribution packages for the failing
191 platforms (ie if new libraries are required)
192 * Feel free to ask for help on PROJECT-Devel list
193 * Go back to the submission process and repeat until the tests pass.
194 * If the tests pass:
195 * If the changes are done as a pull request, then they should be
196 automatically merged to the develop branch.
197 * Changes sent to mailing list require a manual ACK to be merged and should
198 be merged within 2 weeks. If you don’t see the merge or any
199 reason/discussion on PROJECT-Devel, then please ask.
200 * Watch out for questions on the mailing list. At this time there will be a
201 manual code review and further (longer) tests by various community members.
202 * Your submission is done once it is merged to the master branch. (which should
203 happen every few weeks from the develop branch)
204
205
206 ## Code Styling requirements
207
208 ### File header required for new files added
209
210 New files need to have a Copyright header (see [License for
211 contributions](#license-for-contributions) above) added to the file. Preferred
212 form of the header is as follows:
213
214 ```
215 /*
216 Title/Function of file
217 Copyright (C) 2016 Author’s Name
218
219 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
220 it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
221 the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
222 (at your option) any later version.
223
224 This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
225 WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
226 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
227 General Public License for more details.
228
229 You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
230 along with this program; see the file COPYING; if not, write to the
231 Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston,
232 MA 02110-1301 USA
233 */
234
235 #include <zebra.h>
236 ```
237
238 ### Adding Copyright claims to already existing file
239
240 When adding copyright claims for modifications to an existing file, please
241 preface the claim with "Portions: " on a line before it and indent the
242 "Copyright ..." string. If such a case already exists, add your indented claim
243 immediately after. E.g.:
244
245 ```
246 Portions:
247 Copyright (C) 2010 Entity A ....
248 Copyright (C) 2016 Your name [optional brief change description]
249 ```
250
251 ### Code styling / format
252
253 GNU coding standards apply. Indentation follows the result of invoking GNU
254 indent (as of 2.2.8a) with the `-nut -nfc1` arguments.
255
256 ```
257 indent -nut -nfc1 file_for_submission.c
258 ```
259
260 Please don’t reformat existing files (or only sections modified by your
261 changes), even if they don’t follow the standard. This makes it very hard to
262 highlight the changes
263
264 ### Compile-Time conditional code
265
266 Many users access PROJECT via binary packages from 3rd party sources;
267 compile-time code puts inclusion/exclusion in the hands of the package
268 maintainer. Please think very carefully before making code conditional at
269 compile time, as it increases regression testing, maintenance burdens, and user
270 confusion. In particular, please avoid gratuitous --enable-… switches to the
271 configure script - typically code should be good enough to be in PROJECT, or it
272 shouldn’t be there at all.
273
274 When code must be compile-time conditional, try have the compiler make it
275 conditional rather than the C pre-processor - so that it will still be checked
276 by the compiler, even if disabled. I.e. this:
277
278 ```
279 if (SOME_SYMBOL)
280 frobnicate();
281 ```
282
283 rather than
284
285 ```
286 #ifdef SOME_SYMBOL
287 frobnicate ();
288 #endif /* SOME_SYMBOL */
289 ```
290
291 Note that the former approach requires ensuring that `SOME_SYMBOL` will be
292 defined (watch your `AC_DEFINE`s).
293
294 ### Debug-Guards in code
295
296 Debugs are an important methodology to allow developers to fix issues
297 found in the code after it has been released. The caveat here is
298 that the developer must remember that people will be using the code
299 at scale and in ways that can be unexpected for the original implementor.
300 As such debugs MUST be guarded in such a way that they can be turned off.
301 This PROJECT has the ability to turn on/off debugs from the CLI and it is
302 expected that the developer will use this convention to allow control
303 of their debugs.
304
305 ### CLI-Changes
306
307 CLI's are a complicated ugly beast. Additions or changes to the CLI
308 should use a DEFUN to encapsulate one setting as much as is possible.
309 Additionally as new DEFUN's are added to the system, documentation
310 should be provided for the new commands.