1 //! Some lints that are built in to the compiler.
3 //! These are the built-in lints that are emitted direct in the main
4 //! compiler code, rather than using their own custom pass. Those
5 //! lints are all available in `rustc_lint::builtin`.
7 use crate::{declare_lint, declare_lint_pass, FutureIncompatibilityReason}
;
8 use rustc_span
::edition
::Edition
;
9 use rustc_span
::symbol
::sym
;
12 /// The `forbidden_lint_groups` lint detects violations of
13 /// `forbid` applied to a lint group. Due to a bug in the compiler,
14 /// these used to be overlooked entirely. They now generate a warning.
19 /// #![forbid(warnings)]
20 /// #![deny(bad_style)]
27 /// ### Recommended fix
29 /// If your crate is using `#![forbid(warnings)]`,
30 /// we recommend that you change to `#![deny(warnings)]`.
34 /// Due to a compiler bug, applying `forbid` to lint groups
35 /// previously had no effect. The bug is now fixed but instead of
36 /// enforcing `forbid` we issue this future-compatibility warning
37 /// to avoid breaking existing crates.
38 pub FORBIDDEN_LINT_GROUPS
,
40 "applying forbid to lint-groups",
41 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
42 reference
: "issue #81670 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81670>",
47 /// The `ill_formed_attribute_input` lint detects ill-formed attribute
48 /// inputs that were previously accepted and used in practice.
52 /// ```rust,compile_fail
53 /// #[inline = "this is not valid"]
61 /// Previously, inputs for many built-in attributes weren't validated and
62 /// nonsensical attribute inputs were accepted. After validation was
63 /// added, it was determined that some existing projects made use of these
64 /// invalid forms. This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this
65 /// to a hard error in the future. See [issue #57571] for more details.
67 /// Check the [attribute reference] for details on the valid inputs for
70 /// [issue #57571]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57571
71 /// [attribute reference]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/attributes.html
72 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
73 pub ILL_FORMED_ATTRIBUTE_INPUT
,
75 "ill-formed attribute inputs that were previously accepted and used in practice",
76 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
77 reference
: "issue #57571 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57571>",
83 /// The `conflicting_repr_hints` lint detects [`repr` attributes] with
84 /// conflicting hints.
86 /// [`repr` attributes]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/type-layout.html#representations
90 /// ```rust,compile_fail
101 /// The compiler incorrectly accepted these conflicting representations in
102 /// the past. This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a
103 /// hard error in the future. See [issue #68585] for more details.
105 /// To correct the issue, remove one of the conflicting hints.
107 /// [issue #68585]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68585
108 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
109 pub CONFLICTING_REPR_HINTS
,
111 "conflicts between `#[repr(..)]` hints that were previously accepted and used in practice",
112 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
113 reference
: "issue #68585 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68585>",
118 /// The `meta_variable_misuse` lint detects possible meta-variable misuse
119 /// in macro definitions.
123 /// ```rust,compile_fail
124 /// #![deny(meta_variable_misuse)]
126 /// macro_rules! foo {
128 /// ($( $i:ident = $($j:ident),+ );*) => { $( $( $i = $k; )+ )* };
140 /// There are quite a few different ways a [`macro_rules`] macro can be
141 /// improperly defined. Many of these errors were previously only detected
142 /// when the macro was expanded or not at all. This lint is an attempt to
143 /// catch some of these problems when the macro is *defined*.
145 /// This lint is "allow" by default because it may have false positives
146 /// and other issues. See [issue #61053] for more details.
148 /// [`macro_rules`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/macros-by-example.html
149 /// [issue #61053]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61053
150 pub META_VARIABLE_MISUSE
,
152 "possible meta-variable misuse at macro definition"
156 /// The `incomplete_include` lint detects the use of the [`include!`]
157 /// macro with a file that contains more than one expression.
159 /// [`include!`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/macro.include.html
163 /// ```rust,ignore (needs separate file)
165 /// include!("foo.txt");
169 /// where the file `foo.txt` contains:
178 /// error: include macro expected single expression in source
181 /// 1 | println!("1");
184 /// = note: `#[deny(incomplete_include)]` on by default
189 /// The [`include!`] macro is currently only intended to be used to
190 /// include a single [expression] or multiple [items]. Historically it
191 /// would ignore any contents after the first expression, but that can be
192 /// confusing. In the example above, the `println!` expression ends just
193 /// before the semicolon, making the semicolon "extra" information that is
194 /// ignored. Perhaps even more surprising, if the included file had
195 /// multiple print statements, the subsequent ones would be ignored!
197 /// One workaround is to place the contents in braces to create a [block
198 /// expression]. Also consider alternatives, like using functions to
199 /// encapsulate the expressions, or use [proc-macros].
201 /// This is a lint instead of a hard error because existing projects were
202 /// found to hit this error. To be cautious, it is a lint for now. The
203 /// future semantics of the `include!` macro are also uncertain, see
206 /// [items]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items.html
207 /// [expression]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions.html
208 /// [block expression]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/block-expr.html
209 /// [proc-macros]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/procedural-macros.html
210 /// [issue #35560]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35560
211 pub INCOMPLETE_INCLUDE
,
213 "trailing content in included file"
217 /// The `arithmetic_overflow` lint detects that an arithmetic operation
220 /// [overflow]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/operator-expr.html#overflow
224 /// ```rust,compile_fail
232 /// It is very likely a mistake to perform an arithmetic operation that
233 /// overflows its value. If the compiler is able to detect these kinds of
234 /// overflows at compile-time, it will trigger this lint. Consider
235 /// adjusting the expression to avoid overflow, or use a data type that
236 /// will not overflow.
237 pub ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW
,
239 "arithmetic operation overflows"
243 /// The `unconditional_panic` lint detects an operation that will cause a
244 /// panic at runtime.
248 /// ```rust,compile_fail
249 /// # #![allow(unused)]
257 /// This lint detects code that is very likely incorrect because it will
258 /// always panic, such as division by zero and out-of-bounds array
259 /// accesses. Consider adjusting your code if this is a bug, or using the
260 /// `panic!` or `unreachable!` macro instead in case the panic is intended.
261 pub UNCONDITIONAL_PANIC
,
263 "operation will cause a panic at runtime"
267 /// The `unused_imports` lint detects imports that are never used.
272 /// use std::collections::HashMap;
279 /// Unused imports may signal a mistake or unfinished code, and clutter
280 /// the code, and should be removed. If you intended to re-export the item
281 /// to make it available outside of the module, add a visibility modifier
285 "imports that are never used"
289 /// The `must_not_suspend` lint guards against values that shouldn't be held across suspend points
295 /// #![feature(must_not_suspend)]
296 /// #![warn(must_not_suspend)]
298 /// #[must_not_suspend]
299 /// struct SyncThing {}
301 /// async fn yield_now() {}
303 /// pub async fn uhoh() {
304 /// let guard = SyncThing {};
305 /// yield_now().await;
313 /// The `must_not_suspend` lint detects values that are marked with the `#[must_not_suspend]`
314 /// attribute being held across suspend points. A "suspend" point is usually a `.await` in an async
317 /// This attribute can be used to mark values that are semantically incorrect across suspends
318 /// (like certain types of timers), values that have async alternatives, and values that
319 /// regularly cause problems with the `Send`-ness of async fn's returned futures (like
322 pub MUST_NOT_SUSPEND
,
324 "use of a `#[must_not_suspend]` value across a yield point",
325 @feature_gate
= rustc_span
::symbol
::sym
::must_not_suspend
;
329 /// The `unused_extern_crates` lint guards against `extern crate` items
330 /// that are never used.
334 /// ```rust,compile_fail
335 /// #![deny(unused_extern_crates)]
336 /// #![deny(warnings)]
337 /// extern crate proc_macro;
344 /// `extern crate` items that are unused have no effect and should be
345 /// removed. Note that there are some cases where specifying an `extern
346 /// crate` is desired for the side effect of ensuring the given crate is
347 /// linked, even though it is not otherwise directly referenced. The lint
348 /// can be silenced by aliasing the crate to an underscore, such as
349 /// `extern crate foo as _`. Also note that it is no longer idiomatic to
350 /// use `extern crate` in the [2018 edition], as extern crates are now
351 /// automatically added in scope.
353 /// This lint is "allow" by default because it can be noisy, and produce
354 /// false-positives. If a dependency is being removed from a project, it
355 /// is recommended to remove it from the build configuration (such as
356 /// `Cargo.toml`) to ensure stale build entries aren't left behind.
358 /// [2018 edition]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2018/module-system/path-clarity.html#no-more-extern-crate
359 pub UNUSED_EXTERN_CRATES
,
361 "extern crates that are never used"
365 /// The `unused_crate_dependencies` lint detects crate dependencies that
370 /// ```rust,ignore (needs extern crate)
371 /// #![deny(unused_crate_dependencies)]
374 /// This will produce:
377 /// error: external crate `regex` unused in `lint_example`: remove the dependency or add `use regex as _;`
379 /// note: the lint level is defined here
380 /// --> src/lib.rs:1:9
382 /// 1 | #![deny(unused_crate_dependencies)]
383 /// | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
388 /// After removing the code that uses a dependency, this usually also
389 /// requires removing the dependency from the build configuration.
390 /// However, sometimes that step can be missed, which leads to time wasted
391 /// building dependencies that are no longer used. This lint can be
392 /// enabled to detect dependencies that are never used (more specifically,
393 /// any dependency passed with the `--extern` command-line flag that is
394 /// never referenced via [`use`], [`extern crate`], or in any [path]).
396 /// This lint is "allow" by default because it can provide false positives
397 /// depending on how the build system is configured. For example, when
398 /// using Cargo, a "package" consists of multiple crates (such as a
399 /// library and a binary), but the dependencies are defined for the
400 /// package as a whole. If there is a dependency that is only used in the
401 /// binary, but not the library, then the lint will be incorrectly issued
404 /// [path]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/paths.html
405 /// [`use`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/use-declarations.html
406 /// [`extern crate`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/extern-crates.html
407 pub UNUSED_CRATE_DEPENDENCIES
,
409 "crate dependencies that are never used",
414 /// The `unused_qualifications` lint detects unnecessarily qualified
419 /// ```rust,compile_fail
420 /// #![deny(unused_qualifications)]
435 /// If an item from another module is already brought into scope, then
436 /// there is no need to qualify it in this case. You can call `bar()`
437 /// directly, without the `foo::`.
439 /// This lint is "allow" by default because it is somewhat pedantic, and
440 /// doesn't indicate an actual problem, but rather a stylistic choice, and
441 /// can be noisy when refactoring or moving around code.
442 pub UNUSED_QUALIFICATIONS
,
444 "detects unnecessarily qualified names"
448 /// The `unknown_lints` lint detects unrecognized lint attributes.
453 /// #![allow(not_a_real_lint)]
460 /// It is usually a mistake to specify a lint that does not exist. Check
461 /// the spelling, and check the lint listing for the correct name. Also
462 /// consider if you are using an old version of the compiler, and the lint
463 /// is only available in a newer version.
466 "unrecognized lint attribute"
470 /// The `unfulfilled_lint_expectations` lint detects lint trigger expectations
471 /// that have not been fulfilled.
476 /// #![feature(lint_reasons)]
478 /// #[expect(unused_variables)]
480 /// println!("{}", x);
487 /// It was expected that the marked code would emit a lint. This expectation
488 /// has not been fulfilled.
490 /// The `expect` attribute can be removed if this is intended behavior otherwise
491 /// it should be investigated why the expected lint is no longer issued.
493 /// In rare cases, the expectation might be emitted at a different location than
494 /// shown in the shown code snippet. In most cases, the `#[expect]` attribute
495 /// works when added to the outer scope. A few lints can only be expected
496 /// on a crate level.
498 /// Part of RFC 2383. The progress is being tracked in [#54503]
500 /// [#54503]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54503
501 pub UNFULFILLED_LINT_EXPECTATIONS
,
503 "unfulfilled lint expectation",
504 @feature_gate
= rustc_span
::sym
::lint_reasons
;
508 /// The `unused_variables` lint detects variables which are not used in
521 /// Unused variables may signal a mistake or unfinished code. To silence
522 /// the warning for the individual variable, prefix it with an underscore
524 pub UNUSED_VARIABLES
,
526 "detect variables which are not used in any way"
530 /// The `unused_assignments` lint detects assignments that will never be read.
543 /// Unused assignments may signal a mistake or unfinished code. If the
544 /// variable is never used after being assigned, then the assignment can
545 /// be removed. Variables with an underscore prefix such as `_x` will not
546 /// trigger this lint.
547 pub UNUSED_ASSIGNMENTS
,
549 "detect assignments that will never be read"
553 /// The `dead_code` lint detects unused, unexported items.
565 /// Dead code may signal a mistake or unfinished code. To silence the
566 /// warning for individual items, prefix the name with an underscore such
567 /// as `_foo`. If it was intended to expose the item outside of the crate,
568 /// consider adding a visibility modifier like `pub`. Otherwise consider
569 /// removing the unused code.
572 "detect unused, unexported items"
576 /// The `unused_attributes` lint detects attributes that were not used by
589 /// Unused [attributes] may indicate the attribute is placed in the wrong
590 /// position. Consider removing it, or placing it in the correct position.
591 /// Also consider if you intended to use an _inner attribute_ (with a `!`
592 /// such as `#![allow(unused)]`) which applies to the item the attribute
593 /// is within, or an _outer attribute_ (without a `!` such as
594 /// `#[allow(unused)]`) which applies to the item *following* the
597 /// [attributes]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html
598 pub UNUSED_ATTRIBUTES
,
600 "detects attributes that were not used by the compiler"
604 /// The `unused_tuple_struct_fields` lint detects fields of tuple structs
605 /// that are never read.
610 /// #[warn(unused_tuple_struct_fields)]
611 /// struct S(i32, i32, i32);
612 /// let s = S(1, 2, 3);
613 /// let _ = (s.0, s.2);
620 /// Tuple struct fields that are never read anywhere may indicate a
621 /// mistake or unfinished code. To silence this warning, consider
622 /// removing the unused field(s) or, to preserve the numbering of the
623 /// remaining fields, change the unused field(s) to have unit type.
624 pub UNUSED_TUPLE_STRUCT_FIELDS
,
626 "detects tuple struct fields that are never read"
630 /// The `unreachable_code` lint detects unreachable code paths.
635 /// panic!("we never go past here!");
644 /// Unreachable code may signal a mistake or unfinished code. If the code
645 /// is no longer in use, consider removing it.
646 pub UNREACHABLE_CODE
,
648 "detects unreachable code paths",
649 report_in_external_macro
653 /// The `unreachable_patterns` lint detects unreachable patterns.
669 /// This usually indicates a mistake in how the patterns are specified or
670 /// ordered. In this example, the `y` pattern will always match, so the
671 /// five is impossible to reach. Remember, match arms match in order, you
672 /// probably wanted to put the `5` case above the `y` case.
673 pub UNREACHABLE_PATTERNS
,
675 "detects unreachable patterns"
679 /// The `overlapping_range_endpoints` lint detects `match` arms that have [range patterns] that
680 /// overlap on their endpoints.
682 /// [range patterns]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/patterns.html#range-patterns
689 /// 0..=100 => { println!("small"); }
690 /// 100..=255 => { println!("large"); }
698 /// It is likely a mistake to have range patterns in a match expression that overlap in this
699 /// way. Check that the beginning and end values are what you expect, and keep in mind that
700 /// with `..=` the left and right bounds are inclusive.
701 pub OVERLAPPING_RANGE_ENDPOINTS
,
703 "detects range patterns with overlapping endpoints"
707 /// The `bindings_with_variant_name` lint detects pattern bindings with
708 /// the same name as one of the matched variants.
712 /// ```rust,compile_fail
718 /// pub fn foo(x: Enum) {
730 /// It is usually a mistake to specify an enum variant name as an
731 /// [identifier pattern]. In the example above, the `match` arms are
732 /// specifying a variable name to bind the value of `x` to. The second arm
733 /// is ignored because the first one matches *all* values. The likely
734 /// intent is that the arm was intended to match on the enum variant.
736 /// Two possible solutions are:
738 /// * Specify the enum variant using a [path pattern], such as
740 /// * Bring the enum variants into local scope, such as adding `use
741 /// Enum::*;` to the beginning of the `foo` function in the example
744 /// [identifier pattern]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/patterns.html#identifier-patterns
745 /// [path pattern]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/patterns.html#path-patterns
746 pub BINDINGS_WITH_VARIANT_NAME
,
748 "detects pattern bindings with the same name as one of the matched variants"
752 /// The `unused_macros` lint detects macros that were not used.
754 /// Note that this lint is distinct from the `unused_macro_rules` lint,
755 /// which checks for single rules that never match of an otherwise used
756 /// macro, and thus never expand.
761 /// macro_rules! unused {
773 /// Unused macros may signal a mistake or unfinished code. To silence the
774 /// warning for the individual macro, prefix the name with an underscore
775 /// such as `_my_macro`. If you intended to export the macro to make it
776 /// available outside of the crate, use the [`macro_export` attribute].
778 /// [`macro_export` attribute]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/macros-by-example.html#path-based-scope
781 "detects macros that were not used"
785 /// The `unused_macro_rules` lint detects macro rules that were not used.
787 /// Note that the lint is distinct from the `unused_macros` lint, which
788 /// fires if the entire macro is never called, while this lint fires for
789 /// single unused rules of the macro that is otherwise used.
790 /// `unused_macro_rules` fires only if `unused_macros` wouldn't fire.
795 /// #[warn(unused_macro_rules)]
796 /// macro_rules! unused_empty {
797 /// (hello) => { println!("Hello, world!") }; // This rule is unused
798 /// () => { println!("empty") }; // This rule is used
802 /// unused_empty!(hello);
810 /// Unused macro rules may signal a mistake or unfinished code. Furthermore,
811 /// they slow down compilation. Right now, silencing the warning is not
812 /// supported on a single rule level, so you have to add an allow to the
813 /// entire macro definition.
815 /// If you intended to export the macro to make it
816 /// available outside of the crate, use the [`macro_export` attribute].
818 /// [`macro_export` attribute]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/macros-by-example.html#path-based-scope
819 pub UNUSED_MACRO_RULES
,
821 "detects macro rules that were not used"
825 /// The `warnings` lint allows you to change the level of other
826 /// lints which produce warnings.
831 /// #![deny(warnings)]
839 /// The `warnings` lint is a bit special; by changing its level, you
840 /// change every other warning that would produce a warning to whatever
841 /// value you'd like. As such, you won't ever trigger this lint in your
845 "mass-change the level for lints which produce warnings"
849 /// The `unused_features` lint detects unused or unknown features found in
850 /// crate-level [`feature` attributes].
852 /// [`feature` attributes]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/
854 /// Note: This lint is currently not functional, see [issue #44232] for
857 /// [issue #44232]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44232
860 "unused features found in crate-level `#[feature]` directives"
864 /// The `stable_features` lint detects a [`feature` attribute] that
865 /// has since been made stable.
867 /// [`feature` attribute]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/
872 /// #![feature(test_accepted_feature)]
880 /// When a feature is stabilized, it is no longer necessary to include a
881 /// `#![feature]` attribute for it. To fix, simply remove the
882 /// `#![feature]` attribute.
885 "stable features found in `#[feature]` directive"
889 /// The `unknown_crate_types` lint detects an unknown crate type found in
890 /// a [`crate_type` attribute].
894 /// ```rust,compile_fail
895 /// #![crate_type="lol"]
903 /// An unknown value give to the `crate_type` attribute is almost
904 /// certainly a mistake.
906 /// [`crate_type` attribute]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/linkage.html
907 pub UNKNOWN_CRATE_TYPES
,
909 "unknown crate type found in `#[crate_type]` directive",
914 /// The `trivial_casts` lint detects trivial casts which could be replaced
915 /// with coercion, which may require a temporary variable.
919 /// ```rust,compile_fail
920 /// #![deny(trivial_casts)]
921 /// let x: &u32 = &42;
922 /// let y = x as *const u32;
929 /// A trivial cast is a cast `e as T` where `e` has type `U` and `U` is a
930 /// subtype of `T`. This type of cast is usually unnecessary, as it can be
931 /// usually be inferred.
933 /// This lint is "allow" by default because there are situations, such as
934 /// with FFI interfaces or complex type aliases, where it triggers
935 /// incorrectly, or in situations where it will be more difficult to
936 /// clearly express the intent. It may be possible that this will become a
937 /// warning in the future, possibly with an explicit syntax for coercions
938 /// providing a convenient way to work around the current issues.
939 /// See [RFC 401 (coercions)][rfc-401], [RFC 803 (type ascription)][rfc-803] and
940 /// [RFC 3307 (remove type ascription)][rfc-3307] for historical context.
942 /// [rfc-401]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0401-coercions.md
943 /// [rfc-803]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0803-type-ascription.md
944 /// [rfc-3307]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3307-de-rfc-type-ascription.md
947 "detects trivial casts which could be removed"
951 /// The `trivial_numeric_casts` lint detects trivial numeric casts of types
952 /// which could be removed.
956 /// ```rust,compile_fail
957 /// #![deny(trivial_numeric_casts)]
958 /// let x = 42_i32 as i32;
965 /// A trivial numeric cast is a cast of a numeric type to the same numeric
966 /// type. This type of cast is usually unnecessary.
968 /// This lint is "allow" by default because there are situations, such as
969 /// with FFI interfaces or complex type aliases, where it triggers
970 /// incorrectly, or in situations where it will be more difficult to
971 /// clearly express the intent. It may be possible that this will become a
972 /// warning in the future, possibly with an explicit syntax for coercions
973 /// providing a convenient way to work around the current issues.
974 /// See [RFC 401 (coercions)][rfc-401], [RFC 803 (type ascription)][rfc-803] and
975 /// [RFC 3307 (remove type ascription)][rfc-3307] for historical context.
977 /// [rfc-401]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0401-coercions.md
978 /// [rfc-803]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0803-type-ascription.md
979 /// [rfc-3307]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3307-de-rfc-type-ascription.md
980 pub TRIVIAL_NUMERIC_CASTS
,
982 "detects trivial casts of numeric types which could be removed"
986 /// The `private_in_public` lint detects private items in public
987 /// interfaces not caught by the old implementation.
992 /// # #![allow(unused)]
997 /// impl super::SemiPriv {
998 /// pub fn f(_: Priv) {}
1008 /// The visibility rules are intended to prevent exposing private items in
1009 /// public interfaces. This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition
1010 /// this to a hard error in the future. See [issue #34537] for more
1013 /// [issue #34537]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34537
1014 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
1015 pub PRIVATE_IN_PUBLIC
,
1017 "detect private items in public interfaces not caught by the old implementation",
1018 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1019 reference
: "issue #34537 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34537>",
1024 /// The `invalid_alignment` lint detects dereferences of misaligned pointers during
1025 /// constant evaluation.
1029 /// ```rust,compile_fail
1030 /// #![feature(const_mut_refs)]
1031 /// const FOO: () = unsafe {
1032 /// let x = &[0_u8; 4];
1033 /// let y = x.as_ptr().cast::<u32>();
1034 /// let mut z = 123;
1035 /// y.copy_to_nonoverlapping(&mut z, 1); // the address of a `u8` array is unknown
1036 /// // and thus we don't know if it is aligned enough for copying a `u32`.
1044 /// The compiler allowed dereferencing raw pointers irrespective of alignment
1045 /// during const eval due to the const evaluator at the time not making it easy
1046 /// or cheap to check. Now that it is both, this is not accepted anymore.
1048 /// Since it was undefined behaviour to begin with, this breakage does not violate
1049 /// Rust's stability guarantees. Using undefined behaviour can cause arbitrary
1050 /// behaviour, including failure to build.
1052 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
1053 pub INVALID_ALIGNMENT
,
1055 "raw pointers must be aligned before dereferencing",
1056 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1057 reference
: "issue #68585 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104616>",
1058 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::FutureReleaseErrorReportNow
,
1063 /// The `exported_private_dependencies` lint detects private dependencies
1064 /// that are exposed in a public interface.
1068 /// ```rust,ignore (needs-dependency)
1069 /// pub fn foo() -> Option<some_private_dependency::Thing> {
1074 /// This will produce:
1077 /// warning: type `bar::Thing` from private dependency 'bar' in public interface
1078 /// --> src/lib.rs:3:1
1080 /// 3 | pub fn foo() -> Option<bar::Thing> {
1081 /// | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1083 /// = note: `#[warn(exported_private_dependencies)]` on by default
1088 /// Dependencies can be marked as "private" to indicate that they are not
1089 /// exposed in the public interface of a crate. This can be used by Cargo
1090 /// to independently resolve those dependencies because it can assume it
1091 /// does not need to unify them with other packages using that same
1092 /// dependency. This lint is an indication of a violation of that
1095 /// To fix this, avoid exposing the dependency in your public interface.
1096 /// Or, switch the dependency to a public dependency.
1098 /// Note that support for this is only available on the nightly channel.
1099 /// See [RFC 1977] for more details, as well as the [Cargo documentation].
1101 /// [RFC 1977]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1977-public-private-dependencies.md
1102 /// [Cargo documentation]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/unstable.html#public-dependency
1103 pub EXPORTED_PRIVATE_DEPENDENCIES
,
1105 "public interface leaks type from a private dependency"
1109 /// The `pub_use_of_private_extern_crate` lint detects a specific
1110 /// situation of re-exporting a private `extern crate`.
1114 /// ```rust,compile_fail
1115 /// extern crate core;
1116 /// pub use core as reexported_core;
1123 /// A public `use` declaration should not be used to publicly re-export a
1124 /// private `extern crate`. `pub extern crate` should be used instead.
1126 /// This was historically allowed, but is not the intended behavior
1127 /// according to the visibility rules. This is a [future-incompatible]
1128 /// lint to transition this to a hard error in the future. See [issue
1129 /// #34537] for more details.
1131 /// [issue #34537]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34537
1132 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
1133 pub PUB_USE_OF_PRIVATE_EXTERN_CRATE
,
1135 "detect public re-exports of private extern crates",
1136 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1137 reference
: "issue #34537 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34537>",
1142 /// The `invalid_type_param_default` lint detects type parameter defaults
1143 /// erroneously allowed in an invalid location.
1147 /// ```rust,compile_fail
1148 /// fn foo<T=i32>(t: T) {}
1155 /// Default type parameters were only intended to be allowed in certain
1156 /// situations, but historically the compiler allowed them everywhere.
1157 /// This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a hard
1158 /// error in the future. See [issue #36887] for more details.
1160 /// [issue #36887]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36887
1161 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
1162 pub INVALID_TYPE_PARAM_DEFAULT
,
1164 "type parameter default erroneously allowed in invalid location",
1165 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1166 reference
: "issue #36887 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36887>",
1171 /// The `renamed_and_removed_lints` lint detects lints that have been
1172 /// renamed or removed.
1177 /// #![deny(raw_pointer_derive)]
1184 /// To fix this, either remove the lint or use the new name. This can help
1185 /// avoid confusion about lints that are no longer valid, and help
1186 /// maintain consistency for renamed lints.
1187 pub RENAMED_AND_REMOVED_LINTS
,
1189 "lints that have been renamed or removed"
1193 /// The `const_item_mutation` lint detects attempts to mutate a `const`
1199 /// const FOO: [i32; 1] = [0];
1203 /// // This will print "[0]".
1204 /// println!("{:?}", FOO);
1212 /// Trying to directly mutate a `const` item is almost always a mistake.
1213 /// What is happening in the example above is that a temporary copy of the
1214 /// `const` is mutated, but the original `const` is not. Each time you
1215 /// refer to the `const` by name (such as `FOO` in the example above), a
1216 /// separate copy of the value is inlined at that location.
1218 /// This lint checks for writing directly to a field (`FOO.field =
1219 /// some_value`) or array entry (`FOO[0] = val`), or taking a mutable
1220 /// reference to the const item (`&mut FOO`), including through an
1221 /// autoderef (`FOO.some_mut_self_method()`).
1223 /// There are various alternatives depending on what you are trying to
1226 /// * First, always reconsider using mutable globals, as they can be
1227 /// difficult to use correctly, and can make the code more difficult to
1228 /// use or understand.
1229 /// * If you are trying to perform a one-time initialization of a global:
1230 /// * If the value can be computed at compile-time, consider using
1231 /// const-compatible values (see [Constant Evaluation]).
1232 /// * For more complex single-initialization cases, consider using a
1233 /// third-party crate, such as [`lazy_static`] or [`once_cell`].
1234 /// * If you are using the [nightly channel], consider the new
1235 /// [`lazy`] module in the standard library.
1236 /// * If you truly need a mutable global, consider using a [`static`],
1237 /// which has a variety of options:
1238 /// * Simple data types can be directly defined and mutated with an
1239 /// [`atomic`] type.
1240 /// * More complex types can be placed in a synchronization primitive
1241 /// like a [`Mutex`], which can be initialized with one of the options
1243 /// * A [mutable `static`] is a low-level primitive, requiring unsafe.
1244 /// Typically This should be avoided in preference of something
1245 /// higher-level like one of the above.
1247 /// [Constant Evaluation]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/const_eval.html
1248 /// [`static`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/static-items.html
1249 /// [mutable `static`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/static-items.html#mutable-statics
1250 /// [`lazy`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/lazy/index.html
1251 /// [`lazy_static`]: https://crates.io/crates/lazy_static
1252 /// [`once_cell`]: https://crates.io/crates/once_cell
1253 /// [`atomic`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/atomic/index.html
1254 /// [`Mutex`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/struct.Mutex.html
1255 pub CONST_ITEM_MUTATION
,
1257 "detects attempts to mutate a `const` item",
1261 /// The `patterns_in_fns_without_body` lint detects `mut` identifier
1262 /// patterns as a parameter in functions without a body.
1266 /// ```rust,compile_fail
1268 /// fn foo(mut arg: u8);
1276 /// To fix this, remove `mut` from the parameter in the trait definition;
1277 /// it can be used in the implementation. That is, the following is OK:
1281 /// fn foo(arg: u8); // Removed `mut` here
1284 /// impl Trait for i32 {
1285 /// fn foo(mut arg: u8) { // `mut` here is OK
1291 /// Trait definitions can define functions without a body to specify a
1292 /// function that implementors must define. The parameter names in the
1293 /// body-less functions are only allowed to be `_` or an [identifier] for
1294 /// documentation purposes (only the type is relevant). Previous versions
1295 /// of the compiler erroneously allowed [identifier patterns] with the
1296 /// `mut` keyword, but this was not intended to be allowed. This is a
1297 /// [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a hard error in the
1298 /// future. See [issue #35203] for more details.
1300 /// [identifier]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/identifiers.html
1301 /// [identifier patterns]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/patterns.html#identifier-patterns
1302 /// [issue #35203]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35203
1303 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
1304 pub PATTERNS_IN_FNS_WITHOUT_BODY
,
1306 "patterns in functions without body were erroneously allowed",
1307 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1308 reference
: "issue #35203 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35203>",
1313 /// The `missing_fragment_specifier` lint is issued when an unused pattern in a
1314 /// `macro_rules!` macro definition has a meta-variable (e.g. `$e`) that is not
1315 /// followed by a fragment specifier (e.g. `:expr`).
1317 /// This warning can always be fixed by removing the unused pattern in the
1318 /// `macro_rules!` macro definition.
1322 /// ```rust,compile_fail
1323 /// macro_rules! foo {
1337 /// To fix this, remove the unused pattern from the `macro_rules!` macro definition:
1340 /// macro_rules! foo {
1347 pub MISSING_FRAGMENT_SPECIFIER
,
1349 "detects missing fragment specifiers in unused `macro_rules!` patterns",
1350 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1351 reference
: "issue #40107 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40107>",
1356 /// The `late_bound_lifetime_arguments` lint detects generic lifetime
1357 /// arguments in path segments with late bound lifetime parameters.
1365 /// fn late(self, _: &u8, _: &u8) {}
1369 /// S.late::<'static>(&0, &0);
1377 /// It is not clear how to provide arguments for early-bound lifetime
1378 /// parameters if they are intermixed with late-bound parameters in the
1379 /// same list. For now, providing any explicit arguments will trigger this
1380 /// lint if late-bound parameters are present, so in the future a solution
1381 /// can be adopted without hitting backward compatibility issues. This is
1382 /// a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a hard error in the
1383 /// future. See [issue #42868] for more details, along with a description
1384 /// of the difference between early and late-bound parameters.
1386 /// [issue #42868]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42868
1387 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
1388 pub LATE_BOUND_LIFETIME_ARGUMENTS
,
1390 "detects generic lifetime arguments in path segments with late bound lifetime parameters",
1391 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1392 reference
: "issue #42868 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42868>",
1397 /// The `order_dependent_trait_objects` lint detects a trait coherency
1398 /// violation that would allow creating two trait impls for the same
1399 /// dynamic trait object involving marker traits.
1403 /// ```rust,compile_fail
1404 /// pub trait Trait {}
1406 /// impl Trait for dyn Send + Sync { }
1407 /// impl Trait for dyn Sync + Send { }
1414 /// A previous bug caused the compiler to interpret traits with different
1415 /// orders (such as `Send + Sync` and `Sync + Send`) as distinct types
1416 /// when they were intended to be treated the same. This allowed code to
1417 /// define separate trait implementations when there should be a coherence
1418 /// error. This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a
1419 /// hard error in the future. See [issue #56484] for more details.
1421 /// [issue #56484]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56484
1422 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
1423 pub ORDER_DEPENDENT_TRAIT_OBJECTS
,
1425 "trait-object types were treated as different depending on marker-trait order",
1426 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1427 reference
: "issue #56484 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56484>",
1428 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::FutureReleaseErrorReportNow
,
1433 /// The `coherence_leak_check` lint detects conflicting implementations of
1434 /// a trait that are only distinguished by the old leak-check code.
1439 /// trait SomeTrait { }
1440 /// impl SomeTrait for for<'a> fn(&'a u8) { }
1441 /// impl<'a> SomeTrait for fn(&'a u8) { }
1448 /// In the past, the compiler would accept trait implementations for
1449 /// identical functions that differed only in where the lifetime binder
1450 /// appeared. Due to a change in the borrow checker implementation to fix
1451 /// several bugs, this is no longer allowed. However, since this affects
1452 /// existing code, this is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this
1453 /// to a hard error in the future.
1455 /// Code relying on this pattern should introduce "[newtypes]",
1456 /// like `struct Foo(for<'a> fn(&'a u8))`.
1458 /// See [issue #56105] for more details.
1460 /// [issue #56105]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56105
1461 /// [newtypes]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch19-04-advanced-types.html#using-the-newtype-pattern-for-type-safety-and-abstraction
1462 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
1463 pub COHERENCE_LEAK_CHECK
,
1465 "distinct impls distinguished only by the leak-check code",
1466 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1467 reference
: "issue #56105 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56105>",
1472 /// The `deprecated` lint detects use of deprecated items.
1489 /// Items may be marked "deprecated" with the [`deprecated` attribute] to
1490 /// indicate that they should no longer be used. Usually the attribute
1491 /// should include a note on what to use instead, or check the
1494 /// [`deprecated` attribute]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes/diagnostics.html#the-deprecated-attribute
1497 "detects use of deprecated items",
1498 report_in_external_macro
1502 /// The `unused_unsafe` lint detects unnecessary use of an `unsafe` block.
1514 /// If nothing within the block requires `unsafe`, then remove the
1515 /// `unsafe` marker because it is not required and may cause confusion.
1518 "unnecessary use of an `unsafe` block"
1522 /// The `unused_mut` lint detects mut variables which don't need to be
1535 /// The preferred style is to only mark variables as `mut` if it is
1539 "detect mut variables which don't need to be mutable"
1543 /// The `unconditional_recursion` lint detects functions that cannot
1544 /// return without calling themselves.
1558 /// It is usually a mistake to have a recursive call that does not have
1559 /// some condition to cause it to terminate. If you really intend to have
1560 /// an infinite loop, using a `loop` expression is recommended.
1561 pub UNCONDITIONAL_RECURSION
,
1563 "functions that cannot return without calling themselves"
1567 /// The `single_use_lifetimes` lint detects lifetimes that are only used
1572 /// ```rust,compile_fail
1573 /// #![deny(single_use_lifetimes)]
1575 /// fn foo<'a>(x: &'a u32) {}
1582 /// Specifying an explicit lifetime like `'a` in a function or `impl`
1583 /// should only be used to link together two things. Otherwise, you should
1584 /// just use `'_` to indicate that the lifetime is not linked to anything,
1585 /// or elide the lifetime altogether if possible.
1587 /// This lint is "allow" by default because it was introduced at a time
1588 /// when `'_` and elided lifetimes were first being introduced, and this
1589 /// lint would be too noisy. Also, there are some known false positives
1590 /// that it produces. See [RFC 2115] for historical context, and [issue
1591 /// #44752] for more details.
1593 /// [RFC 2115]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2115-argument-lifetimes.md
1594 /// [issue #44752]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44752
1595 pub SINGLE_USE_LIFETIMES
,
1597 "detects lifetime parameters that are only used once"
1601 /// The `unused_lifetimes` lint detects lifetime parameters that are never
1606 /// ```rust,compile_fail
1607 /// #[deny(unused_lifetimes)]
1609 /// pub fn foo<'a>() {}
1616 /// Unused lifetime parameters may signal a mistake or unfinished code.
1617 /// Consider removing the parameter.
1618 pub UNUSED_LIFETIMES
,
1620 "detects lifetime parameters that are never used"
1624 /// The `tyvar_behind_raw_pointer` lint detects raw pointer to an
1625 /// inference variable.
1629 /// ```rust,edition2015
1631 /// let data = std::ptr::null();
1632 /// let _ = &data as *const *const ();
1634 /// if data.is_null() {}
1641 /// This kind of inference was previously allowed, but with the future
1642 /// arrival of [arbitrary self types], this can introduce ambiguity. To
1643 /// resolve this, use an explicit type instead of relying on type
1646 /// This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a hard
1647 /// error in the 2018 edition. See [issue #46906] for more details. This
1648 /// is currently a hard-error on the 2018 edition, and is "warn" by
1649 /// default in the 2015 edition.
1651 /// [arbitrary self types]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44874
1652 /// [issue #46906]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/46906
1653 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
1654 pub TYVAR_BEHIND_RAW_POINTER
,
1656 "raw pointer to an inference variable",
1657 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1658 reference
: "issue #46906 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/46906>",
1659 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::EditionError(Edition
::Edition2018
),
1664 /// The `elided_lifetimes_in_paths` lint detects the use of hidden
1665 /// lifetime parameters.
1669 /// ```rust,compile_fail
1670 /// #![deny(elided_lifetimes_in_paths)]
1671 /// #![deny(warnings)]
1672 /// struct Foo<'a> {
1676 /// fn foo(x: &Foo) {
1684 /// Elided lifetime parameters can make it difficult to see at a glance
1685 /// that borrowing is occurring. This lint ensures that lifetime
1686 /// parameters are always explicitly stated, even if it is the `'_`
1687 /// [placeholder lifetime].
1689 /// This lint is "allow" by default because it has some known issues, and
1690 /// may require a significant transition for old code.
1692 /// [placeholder lifetime]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/lifetime-elision.html#lifetime-elision-in-functions
1693 pub ELIDED_LIFETIMES_IN_PATHS
,
1695 "hidden lifetime parameters in types are deprecated",
1700 /// The `bare_trait_objects` lint suggests using `dyn Trait` for trait
1705 /// ```rust,edition2018
1708 /// fn takes_trait_object(_: Box<Trait>) {
1716 /// Without the `dyn` indicator, it can be ambiguous or confusing when
1717 /// reading code as to whether or not you are looking at a trait object.
1718 /// The `dyn` keyword makes it explicit, and adds a symmetry to contrast
1719 /// with [`impl Trait`].
1721 /// [`impl Trait`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch10-02-traits.html#traits-as-parameters
1722 pub BARE_TRAIT_OBJECTS
,
1724 "suggest using `dyn Trait` for trait objects",
1725 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1726 reference
: "<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/edition-guide/rust-2021/warnings-promoted-to-error.html>",
1727 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::EditionError(Edition
::Edition2021
),
1732 /// The `absolute_paths_not_starting_with_crate` lint detects fully
1733 /// qualified paths that start with a module name instead of `crate`,
1734 /// `self`, or an extern crate name
1738 /// ```rust,edition2015,compile_fail
1739 /// #![deny(absolute_paths_not_starting_with_crate)]
1754 /// Rust [editions] allow the language to evolve without breaking
1755 /// backwards compatibility. This lint catches code that uses absolute
1756 /// paths in the style of the 2015 edition. In the 2015 edition, absolute
1757 /// paths (those starting with `::`) refer to either the crate root or an
1758 /// external crate. In the 2018 edition it was changed so that they only
1759 /// refer to external crates. The path prefix `crate::` should be used
1760 /// instead to reference items from the crate root.
1762 /// If you switch the compiler from the 2015 to 2018 edition without
1763 /// updating the code, then it will fail to compile if the old style paths
1764 /// are used. You can manually change the paths to use the `crate::`
1765 /// prefix to transition to the 2018 edition.
1767 /// This lint solves the problem automatically. It is "allow" by default
1768 /// because the code is perfectly valid in the 2015 edition. The [`cargo
1769 /// fix`] tool with the `--edition` flag will switch this lint to "warn"
1770 /// and automatically apply the suggested fix from the compiler. This
1771 /// provides a completely automated way to update old code to the 2018
1774 /// [editions]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/
1775 /// [`cargo fix`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/commands/cargo-fix.html
1776 pub ABSOLUTE_PATHS_NOT_STARTING_WITH_CRATE
,
1778 "fully qualified paths that start with a module name \
1779 instead of `crate`, `self`, or an extern crate name",
1780 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1781 reference
: "issue #53130 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53130>",
1782 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::EditionError(Edition
::Edition2018
),
1787 /// The `illegal_floating_point_literal_pattern` lint detects
1788 /// floating-point literals used in patterns.
1805 /// Previous versions of the compiler accepted floating-point literals in
1806 /// patterns, but it was later determined this was a mistake. The
1807 /// semantics of comparing floating-point values may not be clear in a
1808 /// pattern when contrasted with "structural equality". Typically you can
1809 /// work around this by using a [match guard], such as:
1815 /// y if y == 5.0 => {}
1820 /// This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a hard
1821 /// error in the future. See [issue #41620] for more details.
1823 /// [issue #41620]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/41620
1824 /// [match guard]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/match-expr.html#match-guards
1825 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
1826 pub ILLEGAL_FLOATING_POINT_LITERAL_PATTERN
,
1828 "floating-point literals cannot be used in patterns",
1829 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1830 reference
: "issue #41620 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/41620>",
1835 /// The `unstable_name_collisions` lint detects that you have used a name
1836 /// that the standard library plans to add in the future.
1841 /// trait MyIterator : Iterator {
1842 /// // is_sorted is an unstable method that already exists on the Iterator trait
1843 /// fn is_sorted(self) -> bool where Self: Sized {true}
1846 /// impl<T: ?Sized> MyIterator for T where T: Iterator { }
1848 /// let x = vec![1, 2, 3];
1849 /// let _ = x.iter().is_sorted();
1856 /// When new methods are added to traits in the standard library, they are
1857 /// usually added in an "unstable" form which is only available on the
1858 /// [nightly channel] with a [`feature` attribute]. If there is any
1859 /// preexisting code which extends a trait to have a method with the same
1860 /// name, then the names will collide. In the future, when the method is
1861 /// stabilized, this will cause an error due to the ambiguity. This lint
1862 /// is an early-warning to let you know that there may be a collision in
1863 /// the future. This can be avoided by adding type annotations to
1864 /// disambiguate which trait method you intend to call, such as
1865 /// `MyIterator::is_sorted(my_iter)` or renaming or removing the method.
1867 /// [nightly channel]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/appendix-07-nightly-rust.html
1868 /// [`feature` attribute]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/
1869 pub UNSTABLE_NAME_COLLISIONS
,
1871 "detects name collision with an existing but unstable method",
1872 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1873 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::Custom(
1874 "once this associated item is added to the standard library, \
1875 the ambiguity may cause an error or change in behavior!"
1877 reference
: "issue #48919 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48919>",
1878 // Note: this item represents future incompatibility of all unstable functions in the
1879 // standard library, and thus should never be removed or changed to an error.
1884 /// The `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint detects [irrefutable patterns]
1885 /// in [`if let`]s, [`while let`]s, and `if let` guards.
1890 /// if let _ = 123 {
1891 /// println!("always runs!");
1899 /// There usually isn't a reason to have an irrefutable pattern in an
1900 /// `if let` or `while let` statement, because the pattern will always match
1901 /// successfully. A [`let`] or [`loop`] statement will suffice. However,
1902 /// when generating code with a macro, forbidding irrefutable patterns
1903 /// would require awkward workarounds in situations where the macro
1904 /// doesn't know if the pattern is refutable or not. This lint allows
1905 /// macros to accept this form, while alerting for a possibly incorrect
1906 /// use in normal code.
1908 /// See [RFC 2086] for more details.
1910 /// [irrefutable patterns]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/patterns.html#refutability
1911 /// [`if let`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/if-expr.html#if-let-expressions
1912 /// [`while let`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html#predicate-pattern-loops
1913 /// [`let`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/statements.html#let-statements
1914 /// [`loop`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html#infinite-loops
1915 /// [RFC 2086]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2086-allow-if-let-irrefutables.md
1916 pub IRREFUTABLE_LET_PATTERNS
,
1918 "detects irrefutable patterns in `if let` and `while let` statements"
1922 /// The `unused_labels` lint detects [labels] that are never used.
1924 /// [labels]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html#loop-labels
1929 /// 'unused_label: loop {}
1936 /// Unused labels may signal a mistake or unfinished code. To silence the
1937 /// warning for the individual label, prefix it with an underscore such as
1941 "detects labels that are never used"
1945 /// The `where_clauses_object_safety` lint detects for [object safety] of
1946 /// [where clauses].
1948 /// [object safety]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/traits.html#object-safety
1949 /// [where clauses]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/generics.html#where-clauses
1956 /// trait X { fn foo(&self) where Self: Trait; }
1958 /// impl X for () { fn foo(&self) {} }
1960 /// impl Trait for dyn X {}
1962 /// // Segfault at opt-level 0, SIGILL otherwise.
1963 /// pub fn main() { <dyn X as X>::foo(&()); }
1970 /// The compiler previously allowed these object-unsafe bounds, which was
1971 /// incorrect. This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to
1972 /// a hard error in the future. See [issue #51443] for more details.
1974 /// [issue #51443]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51443
1975 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
1976 pub WHERE_CLAUSES_OBJECT_SAFETY
,
1978 "checks the object safety of where clauses",
1979 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
1980 reference
: "issue #51443 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51443>",
1985 /// The `proc_macro_derive_resolution_fallback` lint detects proc macro
1986 /// derives using inaccessible names from parent modules.
1990 /// ```rust,ignore (proc-macro)
1992 /// #![crate_type = "proc-macro"]
1994 /// extern crate proc_macro;
1996 /// use proc_macro::*;
1998 /// #[proc_macro_derive(Foo)]
1999 /// pub fn foo1(a: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
2001 /// "mod __bar { static mut BAR: Option<Something> = None; }".parse().unwrap()
2005 /// ```rust,ignore (needs-dependency)
2008 /// extern crate foo;
2010 /// struct Something;
2018 /// This will produce:
2021 /// warning: cannot find type `Something` in this scope
2022 /// --> src/main.rs:8:10
2024 /// 8 | #[derive(Foo)]
2025 /// | ^^^ names from parent modules are not accessible without an explicit import
2027 /// = note: `#[warn(proc_macro_derive_resolution_fallback)]` on by default
2028 /// = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
2029 /// = note: for more information, see issue #50504 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50504>
2034 /// If a proc-macro generates a module, the compiler unintentionally
2035 /// allowed items in that module to refer to items in the crate root
2036 /// without importing them. This is a [future-incompatible] lint to
2037 /// transition this to a hard error in the future. See [issue #50504] for
2040 /// [issue #50504]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50504
2041 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
2042 pub PROC_MACRO_DERIVE_RESOLUTION_FALLBACK
,
2044 "detects proc macro derives using inaccessible names from parent modules",
2045 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
2046 reference
: "issue #83583 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83583>",
2047 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::FutureReleaseErrorReportNow
,
2052 /// The `macro_use_extern_crate` lint detects the use of the
2053 /// [`macro_use` attribute].
2057 /// ```rust,ignore (needs extern crate)
2058 /// #![deny(macro_use_extern_crate)]
2061 /// extern crate serde_json;
2064 /// let _ = json!{{}};
2068 /// This will produce:
2071 /// error: deprecated `#[macro_use]` attribute used to import macros should be replaced at use sites with a `use` item to import the macro instead
2072 /// --> src/main.rs:3:1
2074 /// 3 | #[macro_use]
2077 /// note: the lint level is defined here
2078 /// --> src/main.rs:1:9
2080 /// 1 | #![deny(macro_use_extern_crate)]
2081 /// | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2086 /// The [`macro_use` attribute] on an [`extern crate`] item causes
2087 /// macros in that external crate to be brought into the prelude of the
2088 /// crate, making the macros in scope everywhere. As part of the efforts
2089 /// to simplify handling of dependencies in the [2018 edition], the use of
2090 /// `extern crate` is being phased out. To bring macros from extern crates
2091 /// into scope, it is recommended to use a [`use` import].
2093 /// This lint is "allow" by default because this is a stylistic choice
2094 /// that has not been settled, see [issue #52043] for more information.
2096 /// [`macro_use` attribute]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/macros-by-example.html#the-macro_use-attribute
2097 /// [`use` import]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/use-declarations.html
2098 /// [issue #52043]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52043
2099 pub MACRO_USE_EXTERN_CRATE
,
2101 "the `#[macro_use]` attribute is now deprecated in favor of using macros \
2102 via the module system"
2106 /// The `macro_expanded_macro_exports_accessed_by_absolute_paths` lint
2107 /// detects macro-expanded [`macro_export`] macros from the current crate
2108 /// that cannot be referred to by absolute paths.
2110 /// [`macro_export`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/macros-by-example.html#path-based-scope
2114 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2115 /// macro_rules! define_exported {
2118 /// macro_rules! exported {
2124 /// define_exported!();
2127 /// crate::exported!();
2135 /// The intent is that all macros marked with the `#[macro_export]`
2136 /// attribute are made available in the root of the crate. However, when a
2137 /// `macro_rules!` definition is generated by another macro, the macro
2138 /// expansion is unable to uphold this rule. This is a
2139 /// [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a hard error in the
2140 /// future. See [issue #53495] for more details.
2142 /// [issue #53495]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53495
2143 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
2144 pub MACRO_EXPANDED_MACRO_EXPORTS_ACCESSED_BY_ABSOLUTE_PATHS
,
2146 "macro-expanded `macro_export` macros from the current crate \
2147 cannot be referred to by absolute paths",
2148 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
2149 reference
: "issue #52234 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52234>",
2155 /// The `explicit_outlives_requirements` lint detects unnecessary
2156 /// lifetime bounds that can be inferred.
2160 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2161 /// # #![allow(unused)]
2162 /// #![deny(explicit_outlives_requirements)]
2163 /// #![deny(warnings)]
2165 /// struct SharedRef<'a, T>
2177 /// If a `struct` contains a reference, such as `&'a T`, the compiler
2178 /// requires that `T` outlives the lifetime `'a`. This historically
2179 /// required writing an explicit lifetime bound to indicate this
2180 /// requirement. However, this can be overly explicit, causing clutter and
2181 /// unnecessary complexity. The language was changed to automatically
2182 /// infer the bound if it is not specified. Specifically, if the struct
2183 /// contains a reference, directly or indirectly, to `T` with lifetime
2184 /// `'x`, then it will infer that `T: 'x` is a requirement.
2186 /// This lint is "allow" by default because it can be noisy for existing
2187 /// code that already had these requirements. This is a stylistic choice,
2188 /// as it is still valid to explicitly state the bound. It also has some
2189 /// false positives that can cause confusion.
2191 /// See [RFC 2093] for more details.
2193 /// [RFC 2093]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2093-infer-outlives.md
2194 pub EXPLICIT_OUTLIVES_REQUIREMENTS
,
2196 "outlives requirements can be inferred"
2200 /// The `indirect_structural_match` lint detects a `const` in a pattern
2201 /// that manually implements [`PartialEq`] and [`Eq`].
2203 /// [`PartialEq`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cmp/trait.PartialEq.html
2204 /// [`Eq`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cmp/trait.Eq.html
2208 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2209 /// #![deny(indirect_structural_match)]
2211 /// struct NoDerive(i32);
2212 /// impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
2213 /// impl Eq for NoDerive { }
2214 /// #[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
2215 /// struct WrapParam<T>(T);
2216 /// const WRAP_INDIRECT_PARAM: & &WrapParam<NoDerive> = & &WrapParam(NoDerive(0));
2218 /// match WRAP_INDIRECT_PARAM {
2219 /// WRAP_INDIRECT_PARAM => { }
2229 /// The compiler unintentionally accepted this form in the past. This is a
2230 /// [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a hard error in the
2231 /// future. See [issue #62411] for a complete description of the problem,
2232 /// and some possible solutions.
2234 /// [issue #62411]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62411
2235 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
2236 pub INDIRECT_STRUCTURAL_MATCH
,
2238 "constant used in pattern contains value of non-structural-match type in a field or a variant",
2239 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
2240 reference
: "issue #62411 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62411>",
2245 /// The `deprecated_in_future` lint is internal to rustc and should not be
2246 /// used by user code.
2248 /// This lint is only enabled in the standard library. It works with the
2249 /// use of `#[deprecated]` with a `since` field of a version in the future.
2250 /// This allows something to be marked as deprecated in a future version,
2251 /// and then this lint will ensure that the item is no longer used in the
2252 /// standard library. See the [stability documentation] for more details.
2254 /// [stability documentation]: https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/stability.html#deprecated
2255 pub DEPRECATED_IN_FUTURE
,
2257 "detects use of items that will be deprecated in a future version",
2258 report_in_external_macro
2262 /// The `pointer_structural_match` lint detects pointers used in patterns whose behaviour
2263 /// cannot be relied upon across compiler versions and optimization levels.
2267 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2268 /// #![deny(pointer_structural_match)]
2269 /// fn foo(a: usize, b: usize) -> usize { a + b }
2270 /// const FOO: fn(usize, usize) -> usize = foo;
2283 /// Previous versions of Rust allowed function pointers and wide raw pointers in patterns.
2284 /// While these work in many cases as expected by users, it is possible that due to
2285 /// optimizations pointers are "not equal to themselves" or pointers to different functions
2286 /// compare as equal during runtime. This is because LLVM optimizations can deduplicate
2287 /// functions if their bodies are the same, thus also making pointers to these functions point
2288 /// to the same location. Additionally functions may get duplicated if they are instantiated
2289 /// in different crates and not deduplicated again via LTO.
2290 pub POINTER_STRUCTURAL_MATCH
,
2292 "pointers are not structural-match",
2293 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
2294 reference
: "issue #62411 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70861>",
2299 /// The `nontrivial_structural_match` lint detects constants that are used in patterns,
2300 /// whose type is not structural-match and whose initializer body actually uses values
2301 /// that are not structural-match. So `Option<NotStructuralMatch>` is ok if the constant
2306 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2307 /// #![deny(nontrivial_structural_match)]
2309 /// #[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
2310 /// struct NoDerive(u32);
2311 /// impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
2312 /// impl Eq for NoDerive { }
2314 /// const INDEX: Option<NoDerive> = [None, Some(NoDerive(10))][0];
2315 /// match None { Some(_) => panic!("whoops"), INDEX => dbg!(INDEX), };
2323 /// Previous versions of Rust accepted constants in patterns, even if those constants' types
2324 /// did not have `PartialEq` derived. Thus the compiler falls back to runtime execution of
2325 /// `PartialEq`, which can report that two constants are not equal even if they are
2327 pub NONTRIVIAL_STRUCTURAL_MATCH
,
2329 "constant used in pattern of non-structural-match type and the constant's initializer \
2330 expression contains values of non-structural-match types",
2331 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
2332 reference
: "issue #73448 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73448>",
2337 /// The `ambiguous_associated_items` lint detects ambiguity between
2338 /// [associated items] and [enum variants].
2340 /// [associated items]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/associated-items.html
2341 /// [enum variants]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/enumerations.html
2345 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2352 /// fn foo() -> Self::V;
2357 /// // `Self::V` is ambiguous because it may refer to the associated type or
2358 /// // the enum variant.
2359 /// fn foo() -> Self::V { 0 }
2367 /// Previous versions of Rust did not allow accessing enum variants
2368 /// through [type aliases]. When this ability was added (see [RFC 2338]), this
2369 /// introduced some situations where it can be ambiguous what a type
2370 /// was referring to.
2372 /// To fix this ambiguity, you should use a [qualified path] to explicitly
2373 /// state which type to use. For example, in the above example the
2374 /// function can be written as `fn f() -> <Self as Tr>::V { 0 }` to
2375 /// specifically refer to the associated type.
2377 /// This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a hard
2378 /// error in the future. See [issue #57644] for more details.
2380 /// [issue #57644]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57644
2381 /// [type aliases]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/type-aliases.html#type-aliases
2382 /// [RFC 2338]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2338-type-alias-enum-variants.md
2383 /// [qualified path]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/paths.html#qualified-paths
2384 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
2385 pub AMBIGUOUS_ASSOCIATED_ITEMS
,
2387 "ambiguous associated items",
2388 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
2389 reference
: "issue #57644 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57644>",
2394 /// The `soft_unstable` lint detects unstable features that were
2395 /// unintentionally allowed on stable.
2399 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2401 /// extern crate test;
2404 /// fn name(b: &mut test::Bencher) {
2413 /// The [`bench` attribute] was accidentally allowed to be specified on
2414 /// the [stable release channel]. Turning this to a hard error would have
2415 /// broken some projects. This lint allows those projects to continue to
2416 /// build correctly when [`--cap-lints`] is used, but otherwise signal an
2417 /// error that `#[bench]` should not be used on the stable channel. This
2418 /// is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a hard error in
2419 /// the future. See [issue #64266] for more details.
2421 /// [issue #64266]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64266
2422 /// [`bench` attribute]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/library-features/test.html
2423 /// [stable release channel]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/appendix-07-nightly-rust.html
2424 /// [`--cap-lints`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/lints/levels.html#capping-lints
2425 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
2428 "a feature gate that doesn't break dependent crates",
2429 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
2430 reference
: "issue #64266 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64266>",
2435 /// The `inline_no_sanitize` lint detects incompatible use of
2436 /// [`#[inline(always)]`][inline] and [`#[no_sanitize(...)]`][no_sanitize].
2438 /// [inline]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes/codegen.html#the-inline-attribute
2439 /// [no_sanitize]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/language-features/no-sanitize.html
2444 /// #![feature(no_sanitize)]
2446 /// #[inline(always)]
2447 /// #[no_sanitize(address)]
2459 /// The use of the [`#[inline(always)]`][inline] attribute prevents the
2460 /// the [`#[no_sanitize(...)]`][no_sanitize] attribute from working.
2461 /// Consider temporarily removing `inline` attribute.
2462 pub INLINE_NO_SANITIZE
,
2464 "detects incompatible use of `#[inline(always)]` and `#[no_sanitize(...)]`",
2468 /// The `asm_sub_register` lint detects using only a subset of a register
2469 /// for inline asm inputs.
2473 /// ```rust,ignore (fails on non-x86_64)
2474 /// #[cfg(target_arch="x86_64")]
2475 /// use std::arch::asm;
2478 /// #[cfg(target_arch="x86_64")]
2480 /// asm!("mov {0}, {0}", in(reg) 0i16);
2485 /// This will produce:
2488 /// warning: formatting may not be suitable for sub-register argument
2489 /// --> src/main.rs:7:19
2491 /// 7 | asm!("mov {0}, {0}", in(reg) 0i16);
2492 /// | ^^^ ^^^ ---- for this argument
2494 /// = note: `#[warn(asm_sub_register)]` on by default
2495 /// = help: use the `x` modifier to have the register formatted as `ax`
2496 /// = help: or use the `r` modifier to keep the default formatting of `rax`
2501 /// Registers on some architectures can use different names to refer to a
2502 /// subset of the register. By default, the compiler will use the name for
2503 /// the full register size. To explicitly use a subset of the register,
2504 /// you can override the default by using a modifier on the template
2505 /// string operand to specify when subregister to use. This lint is issued
2506 /// if you pass in a value with a smaller data type than the default
2507 /// register size, to alert you of possibly using the incorrect width. To
2508 /// fix this, add the suggested modifier to the template, or cast the
2509 /// value to the correct size.
2511 /// See [register template modifiers] in the reference for more details.
2513 /// [register template modifiers]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/inline-assembly.html#template-modifiers
2514 pub ASM_SUB_REGISTER
,
2516 "using only a subset of a register for inline asm inputs",
2520 /// The `bad_asm_style` lint detects the use of the `.intel_syntax` and
2521 /// `.att_syntax` directives.
2525 /// ```rust,ignore (fails on non-x86_64)
2526 /// #[cfg(target_arch="x86_64")]
2527 /// use std::arch::asm;
2530 /// #[cfg(target_arch="x86_64")]
2534 /// "movq %{0}, %{0}", in(reg) 0usize
2540 /// This will produce:
2543 /// warning: avoid using `.att_syntax`, prefer using `options(att_syntax)` instead
2544 /// --> src/main.rs:8:14
2546 /// 8 | ".att_syntax",
2549 /// = note: `#[warn(bad_asm_style)]` on by default
2554 /// On x86, `asm!` uses the intel assembly syntax by default. While this
2555 /// can be switched using assembler directives like `.att_syntax`, using the
2556 /// `att_syntax` option is recommended instead because it will also properly
2557 /// prefix register placeholders with `%` as required by AT&T syntax.
2560 "incorrect use of inline assembly",
2564 /// The `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` lint detects unsafe operations in unsafe
2565 /// functions without an explicit unsafe block.
2569 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2570 /// #![deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]
2572 /// unsafe fn foo() {}
2574 /// unsafe fn bar() {
2585 /// Currently, an [`unsafe fn`] allows any [unsafe] operation within its
2586 /// body. However, this can increase the surface area of code that needs
2587 /// to be scrutinized for proper behavior. The [`unsafe` block] provides a
2588 /// convenient way to make it clear exactly which parts of the code are
2589 /// performing unsafe operations. In the future, it is desired to change
2590 /// it so that unsafe operations cannot be performed in an `unsafe fn`
2591 /// without an `unsafe` block.
2593 /// The fix to this is to wrap the unsafe code in an `unsafe` block.
2595 /// This lint is "allow" by default since this will affect a large amount
2596 /// of existing code, and the exact plan for increasing the severity is
2597 /// still being considered. See [RFC #2585] and [issue #71668] for more
2600 /// [`unsafe fn`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/unsafe-functions.html
2601 /// [`unsafe` block]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/block-expr.html#unsafe-blocks
2602 /// [unsafe]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/unsafety.html
2603 /// [RFC #2585]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2585-unsafe-block-in-unsafe-fn.md
2604 /// [issue #71668]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71668
2605 pub UNSAFE_OP_IN_UNSAFE_FN
,
2607 "unsafe operations in unsafe functions without an explicit unsafe block are deprecated",
2611 /// The `cenum_impl_drop_cast` lint detects an `as` cast of a field-less
2612 /// `enum` that implements [`Drop`].
2614 /// [`Drop`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/trait.Drop.html
2618 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2619 /// # #![allow(unused)]
2624 /// impl Drop for E {
2625 /// fn drop(&mut self) {
2626 /// println!("Drop");
2632 /// let i = e as u32;
2640 /// Casting a field-less `enum` that does not implement [`Copy`] to an
2641 /// integer moves the value without calling `drop`. This can result in
2642 /// surprising behavior if it was expected that `drop` should be called.
2643 /// Calling `drop` automatically would be inconsistent with other move
2644 /// operations. Since neither behavior is clear or consistent, it was
2645 /// decided that a cast of this nature will no longer be allowed.
2647 /// This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a hard error
2648 /// in the future. See [issue #73333] for more details.
2650 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
2651 /// [issue #73333]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73333
2652 /// [`Copy`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/marker/trait.Copy.html
2653 pub CENUM_IMPL_DROP_CAST
,
2655 "a C-like enum implementing Drop is cast",
2656 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
2657 reference
: "issue #73333 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73333>",
2658 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::FutureReleaseErrorReportNow
,
2663 /// The `fuzzy_provenance_casts` lint detects an `as` cast between an integer
2669 /// #![feature(strict_provenance)]
2670 /// #![warn(fuzzy_provenance_casts)]
2673 /// let _dangling = 16_usize as *const u8;
2681 /// This lint is part of the strict provenance effort, see [issue #95228].
2682 /// Casting an integer to a pointer is considered bad style, as a pointer
2683 /// contains, besides the *address* also a *provenance*, indicating what
2684 /// memory the pointer is allowed to read/write. Casting an integer, which
2685 /// doesn't have provenance, to a pointer requires the compiler to assign
2686 /// (guess) provenance. The compiler assigns "all exposed valid" (see the
2687 /// docs of [`ptr::from_exposed_addr`] for more information about this
2688 /// "exposing"). This penalizes the optimiser and is not well suited for
2689 /// dynamic analysis/dynamic program verification (e.g. Miri or CHERI
2692 /// It is much better to use [`ptr::with_addr`] instead to specify the
2693 /// provenance you want. If using this function is not possible because the
2694 /// code relies on exposed provenance then there is as an escape hatch
2695 /// [`ptr::from_exposed_addr`].
2697 /// [issue #95228]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95228
2698 /// [`ptr::with_addr`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/ptr/fn.with_addr
2699 /// [`ptr::from_exposed_addr`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/ptr/fn.from_exposed_addr
2700 pub FUZZY_PROVENANCE_CASTS
,
2702 "a fuzzy integer to pointer cast is used",
2703 @feature_gate
= sym
::strict_provenance
;
2707 /// The `lossy_provenance_casts` lint detects an `as` cast between a pointer
2713 /// #![feature(strict_provenance)]
2714 /// #![warn(lossy_provenance_casts)]
2718 /// let _addr: usize = &x as *const u8 as usize;
2726 /// This lint is part of the strict provenance effort, see [issue #95228].
2727 /// Casting a pointer to an integer is a lossy operation, because beyond
2728 /// just an *address* a pointer may be associated with a particular
2729 /// *provenance*. This information is used by the optimiser and for dynamic
2730 /// analysis/dynamic program verification (e.g. Miri or CHERI platforms).
2732 /// Since this cast is lossy, it is considered good style to use the
2733 /// [`ptr::addr`] method instead, which has a similar effect, but doesn't
2734 /// "expose" the pointer provenance. This improves optimisation potential.
2735 /// See the docs of [`ptr::addr`] and [`ptr::expose_addr`] for more information
2736 /// about exposing pointer provenance.
2738 /// If your code can't comply with strict provenance and needs to expose
2739 /// the provenance, then there is [`ptr::expose_addr`] as an escape hatch,
2740 /// which preserves the behaviour of `as usize` casts while being explicit
2741 /// about the semantics.
2743 /// [issue #95228]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95228
2744 /// [`ptr::addr`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/ptr/fn.addr
2745 /// [`ptr::expose_addr`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/ptr/fn.expose_addr
2746 pub LOSSY_PROVENANCE_CASTS
,
2748 "a lossy pointer to integer cast is used",
2749 @feature_gate
= sym
::strict_provenance
;
2753 /// The `const_evaluatable_unchecked` lint detects a generic constant used
2759 /// const fn foo<T>() -> usize {
2760 /// if std::mem::size_of::<*mut T>() < 8 { // size of *mut T does not depend on T
2768 /// let _ = [0; foo::<T>()];
2776 /// In the 1.43 release, some uses of generic parameters in array repeat
2777 /// expressions were accidentally allowed. This is a [future-incompatible]
2778 /// lint to transition this to a hard error in the future. See [issue
2779 /// #76200] for a more detailed description and possible fixes.
2781 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
2782 /// [issue #76200]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76200
2783 pub CONST_EVALUATABLE_UNCHECKED
,
2785 "detects a generic constant is used in a type without a emitting a warning",
2786 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
2787 reference
: "issue #76200 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76200>",
2792 /// The `function_item_references` lint detects function references that are
2793 /// formatted with [`fmt::Pointer`] or transmuted.
2795 /// [`fmt::Pointer`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/trait.Pointer.html
2803 /// println!("{:p}", &foo);
2811 /// Taking a reference to a function may be mistaken as a way to obtain a
2812 /// pointer to that function. This can give unexpected results when
2813 /// formatting the reference as a pointer or transmuting it. This lint is
2814 /// issued when function references are formatted as pointers, passed as
2815 /// arguments bound by [`fmt::Pointer`] or transmuted.
2816 pub FUNCTION_ITEM_REFERENCES
,
2818 "suggest casting to a function pointer when attempting to take references to function items",
2822 /// The `uninhabited_static` lint detects uninhabited statics.
2829 /// static EXTERN: Void;
2837 /// Statics with an uninhabited type can never be initialized, so they are impossible to define.
2838 /// However, this can be side-stepped with an `extern static`, leading to problems later in the
2839 /// compiler which assumes that there are no initialized uninhabited places (such as locals or
2840 /// statics). This was accidentally allowed, but is being phased out.
2841 pub UNINHABITED_STATIC
,
2843 "uninhabited static",
2844 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
2845 reference
: "issue #74840 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74840>",
2850 /// The `unnameable_test_items` lint detects [`#[test]`][test] functions
2851 /// that are not able to be run by the test harness because they are in a
2852 /// position where they are not nameable.
2854 /// [test]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes/testing.html#the-test-attribute
2862 /// // This test will not fail because it does not run.
2863 /// assert_eq!(1, 2);
2872 /// In order for the test harness to run a test, the test function must be
2873 /// located in a position where it can be accessed from the crate root.
2874 /// This generally means it must be defined in a module, and not anywhere
2875 /// else such as inside another function. The compiler previously allowed
2876 /// this without an error, so a lint was added as an alert that a test is
2877 /// not being used. Whether or not this should be allowed has not yet been
2878 /// decided, see [RFC 2471] and [issue #36629].
2880 /// [RFC 2471]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2471#issuecomment-397414443
2881 /// [issue #36629]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36629
2882 pub UNNAMEABLE_TEST_ITEMS
,
2884 "detects an item that cannot be named being marked as `#[test_case]`",
2885 report_in_external_macro
2889 /// The `useless_deprecated` lint detects deprecation attributes with no effect.
2893 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2896 /// #[deprecated = "message"]
2897 /// impl Default for X {
2898 /// fn default() -> Self {
2908 /// Deprecation attributes have no effect on trait implementations.
2909 pub USELESS_DEPRECATED
,
2911 "detects deprecation attributes with no effect",
2915 /// The `undefined_naked_function_abi` lint detects naked function definitions that
2916 /// either do not specify an ABI or specify the Rust ABI.
2921 /// #![feature(asm_experimental_arch, naked_functions)]
2923 /// use std::arch::asm;
2926 /// pub fn default_abi() -> u32 {
2927 /// unsafe { asm!("", options(noreturn)); }
2931 /// pub extern "Rust" fn rust_abi() -> u32 {
2932 /// unsafe { asm!("", options(noreturn)); }
2940 /// The Rust ABI is currently undefined. Therefore, naked functions should
2941 /// specify a non-Rust ABI.
2942 pub UNDEFINED_NAKED_FUNCTION_ABI
,
2944 "undefined naked function ABI"
2948 /// The `ineffective_unstable_trait_impl` lint detects `#[unstable]` attributes which are not used.
2952 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2953 /// #![feature(staged_api)]
2955 /// #[derive(Clone)]
2956 /// #[stable(feature = "x", since = "1")]
2959 /// #[unstable(feature = "y", issue = "none")]
2960 /// impl Copy for S {}
2967 /// `staged_api` does not currently support using a stability attribute on `impl` blocks.
2968 /// `impl`s are always stable if both the type and trait are stable, and always unstable otherwise.
2969 pub INEFFECTIVE_UNSTABLE_TRAIT_IMPL
,
2971 "detects `#[unstable]` on stable trait implementations for stable types"
2975 /// The `semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros` lint detects trailing semicolons
2976 /// in macro bodies when the macro is invoked in expression position.
2977 /// This was previous accepted, but is being phased out.
2981 /// ```rust,compile_fail
2982 /// #![deny(semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros)]
2983 /// macro_rules! foo {
2988 /// let val = match true {
2999 /// Previous, Rust ignored trailing semicolon in a macro
3000 /// body when a macro was invoked in expression position.
3001 /// However, this makes the treatment of semicolons in the language
3002 /// inconsistent, and could lead to unexpected runtime behavior
3003 /// in some circumstances (e.g. if the macro author expects
3004 /// a value to be dropped).
3006 /// This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this
3007 /// to a hard error in the future. See [issue #79813] for more details.
3009 /// [issue #79813]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79813
3010 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
3011 pub SEMICOLON_IN_EXPRESSIONS_FROM_MACROS
,
3013 "trailing semicolon in macro body used as expression",
3014 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3015 reference
: "issue #79813 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79813>",
3016 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::FutureReleaseErrorReportNow
,
3021 /// The `legacy_derive_helpers` lint detects derive helper attributes
3022 /// that are used before they are introduced.
3026 /// ```rust,ignore (needs extern crate)
3027 /// #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
3028 /// #[derive(Deserialize)]
3029 /// struct S { /* fields */ }
3035 /// warning: derive helper attribute is used before it is introduced
3036 /// --> $DIR/legacy-derive-helpers.rs:1:3
3038 /// 1 | #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
3041 /// 2 | #[derive(Deserialize)]
3042 /// | ----------- the attribute is introduced here
3047 /// Attributes like this work for historical reasons, but attribute expansion works in
3048 /// left-to-right order in general, so, to resolve `#[serde]`, compiler has to try to "look
3049 /// into the future" at not yet expanded part of the item , but such attempts are not always
3052 /// To fix the warning place the helper attribute after its corresponding derive.
3053 /// ```rust,ignore (needs extern crate)
3054 /// #[derive(Deserialize)]
3055 /// #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
3056 /// struct S { /* fields */ }
3058 pub LEGACY_DERIVE_HELPERS
,
3060 "detects derive helper attributes that are used before they are introduced",
3061 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3062 reference
: "issue #79202 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79202>",
3067 /// The `large_assignments` lint detects when objects of large
3068 /// types are being moved around.
3072 /// ```rust,ignore (can crash on some platforms)
3073 /// let x = [0; 50000];
3080 /// warning: moving a large value
3081 /// --> $DIR/move-large.rs:1:3
3083 /// - Copied large value here
3088 /// When using a large type in a plain assignment or in a function
3089 /// argument, idiomatic code can be inefficient.
3090 /// Ideally appropriate optimizations would resolve this, but such
3091 /// optimizations are only done in a best-effort manner.
3092 /// This lint will trigger on all sites of large moves and thus allow the
3093 /// user to resolve them in code.
3094 pub LARGE_ASSIGNMENTS
,
3096 "detects large moves or copies",
3100 /// The `deprecated_cfg_attr_crate_type_name` lint detects uses of the
3101 /// `#![cfg_attr(..., crate_type = "...")]` and
3102 /// `#![cfg_attr(..., crate_name = "...")]` attributes to conditionally
3103 /// specify the crate type and name in the source code.
3107 /// ```rust,compile_fail
3108 /// #![cfg_attr(debug_assertions, crate_type = "lib")]
3116 /// The `#![crate_type]` and `#![crate_name]` attributes require a hack in
3117 /// the compiler to be able to change the used crate type and crate name
3118 /// after macros have been expanded. Neither attribute works in combination
3119 /// with Cargo as it explicitly passes `--crate-type` and `--crate-name` on
3120 /// the commandline. These values must match the value used in the source
3121 /// code to prevent an error.
3123 /// To fix the warning use `--crate-type` on the commandline when running
3124 /// rustc instead of `#![cfg_attr(..., crate_type = "...")]` and
3125 /// `--crate-name` instead of `#![cfg_attr(..., crate_name = "...")]`.
3126 pub DEPRECATED_CFG_ATTR_CRATE_TYPE_NAME
,
3128 "detects usage of `#![cfg_attr(..., crate_type/crate_name = \"...\")]`",
3129 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3130 reference
: "issue #91632 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91632>",
3135 /// The `unexpected_cfgs` lint detects unexpected conditional compilation conditions.
3140 /// rustc --check-cfg 'names()'
3143 /// ```rust,ignore (needs command line option)
3148 /// This will produce:
3151 /// warning: unknown condition name used
3152 /// --> lint_example.rs:1:7
3154 /// 1 | #[cfg(widnows)]
3157 /// = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
3162 /// This lint is only active when a `--check-cfg='names(...)'` option has been passed
3163 /// to the compiler and triggers whenever an unknown condition name or value is used.
3164 /// The known condition include names or values passed in `--check-cfg`, `--cfg`, and some
3165 /// well-knows names and values built into the compiler.
3166 pub UNEXPECTED_CFGS
,
3168 "detects unexpected names and values in `#[cfg]` conditions",
3172 /// The `repr_transparent_external_private_fields` lint
3173 /// detects types marked `#[repr(transparent)]` that (transitively)
3174 /// contain an external ZST type marked `#[non_exhaustive]` or containing
3179 /// ```rust,ignore (needs external crate)
3180 /// #![deny(repr_transparent_external_private_fields)]
3181 /// use foo::NonExhaustiveZst;
3183 /// #[repr(transparent)]
3184 /// struct Bar(u32, ([u32; 0], NonExhaustiveZst));
3187 /// This will produce:
3190 /// error: zero-sized fields in repr(transparent) cannot contain external non-exhaustive types
3191 /// --> src/main.rs:5:28
3193 /// 5 | struct Bar(u32, ([u32; 0], NonExhaustiveZst));
3194 /// | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
3196 /// note: the lint level is defined here
3197 /// --> src/main.rs:1:9
3199 /// 1 | #![deny(repr_transparent_external_private_fields)]
3200 /// | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
3201 /// = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
3202 /// = note: for more information, see issue #78586 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78586>
3203 /// = note: this struct contains `NonExhaustiveZst`, which is marked with `#[non_exhaustive]`, and makes it not a breaking change to become non-zero-sized in the future.
3208 /// Previous, Rust accepted fields that contain external private zero-sized types,
3209 /// even though it should not be a breaking change to add a non-zero-sized field to
3210 /// that private type.
3212 /// This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this
3213 /// to a hard error in the future. See [issue #78586] for more details.
3215 /// [issue #78586]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78586
3216 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
3217 pub REPR_TRANSPARENT_EXTERNAL_PRIVATE_FIELDS
,
3219 "transparent type contains an external ZST that is marked #[non_exhaustive] or contains private fields",
3220 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3221 reference
: "issue #78586 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78586>",
3226 /// The `unstable_syntax_pre_expansion` lint detects the use of unstable
3227 /// syntax that is discarded during attribute expansion.
3240 /// The input to active attributes such as `#[cfg]` or procedural macro
3241 /// attributes is required to be valid syntax. Previously, the compiler only
3242 /// gated the use of unstable syntax features after resolving `#[cfg]` gates
3243 /// and expanding procedural macros.
3245 /// To avoid relying on unstable syntax, move the use of unstable syntax
3246 /// into a position where the compiler does not parse the syntax, such as a
3247 /// functionlike macro.
3250 /// # #![deny(unstable_syntax_pre_expansion)]
3252 /// macro_rules! identity {
3253 /// ( $($tokens:tt)* ) => { $($tokens)* }
3262 /// This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this
3263 /// to a hard error in the future. See [issue #65860] for more details.
3265 /// [issue #65860]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65860
3266 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
3267 pub UNSTABLE_SYNTAX_PRE_EXPANSION
,
3269 "unstable syntax can change at any point in the future, causing a hard error!",
3270 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3271 reference
: "issue #65860 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65860>",
3276 /// The `ambiguous_glob_reexports` lint detects cases where names re-exported via globs
3277 /// collide. Downstream users trying to use the same name re-exported from multiple globs
3278 /// will receive a warning pointing out redefinition of the same name.
3282 /// ```rust,compile_fail
3283 /// #![deny(ambiguous_glob_reexports)]
3285 /// pub type X = u8;
3289 /// pub type Y = u8;
3290 /// pub type X = u8;
3297 /// pub fn main() {}
3304 /// This was previously accepted but it could silently break a crate's downstream users code.
3305 /// For example, if `foo::*` and `bar::*` were re-exported before `bar::X` was added to the
3306 /// re-exports, down stream users could use `this_crate::X` without problems. However, adding
3307 /// `bar::X` would cause compilation errors in downstream crates because `X` is defined
3308 /// multiple times in the same namespace of `this_crate`.
3309 pub AMBIGUOUS_GLOB_REEXPORTS
,
3311 "ambiguous glob re-exports",
3315 /// The `hidden_glob_reexports` lint detects cases where glob re-export items are shadowed by
3320 /// ```rust,compile_fail
3321 /// #![deny(hidden_glob_reexports)]
3323 /// pub mod upstream {
3324 /// mod inner { pub struct Foo {}; pub struct Bar {}; }
3325 /// pub use self::inner::*;
3326 /// struct Foo {} // private item shadows `inner::Foo`
3329 /// // mod downstream {
3331 /// // let _ = crate::upstream::Foo; // inaccessible
3335 /// pub fn main() {}
3342 /// This was previously accepted without any errors or warnings but it could silently break a
3343 /// crate's downstream user code. If the `struct Foo` was added, `dep::inner::Foo` would
3344 /// silently become inaccessible and trigger a "`struct `Foo` is private`" visibility error at
3345 /// the downstream use site.
3346 pub HIDDEN_GLOB_REEXPORTS
,
3348 "name introduced by a private item shadows a name introduced by a public glob re-export",
3351 declare_lint_pass
! {
3352 /// Does nothing as a lint pass, but registers some `Lint`s
3353 /// that are used by other parts of the compiler.
3355 // tidy-alphabetical-start
3356 ABSOLUTE_PATHS_NOT_STARTING_WITH_CRATE
,
3357 AMBIGUOUS_ASSOCIATED_ITEMS
,
3358 AMBIGUOUS_GLOB_IMPORTS
,
3359 AMBIGUOUS_GLOB_REEXPORTS
,
3360 ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW
,
3364 BINDINGS_WITH_VARIANT_NAME
,
3365 BREAK_WITH_LABEL_AND_LOOP
,
3366 BYTE_SLICE_IN_PACKED_STRUCT_WITH_DERIVE
,
3367 CENUM_IMPL_DROP_CAST
,
3368 COHERENCE_LEAK_CHECK
,
3369 COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE
,
3370 CONFLICTING_REPR_HINTS
,
3371 CONST_EVALUATABLE_UNCHECKED
,
3372 CONST_ITEM_MUTATION
,
3375 DEPRECATED_CFG_ATTR_CRATE_TYPE_NAME
,
3376 DEPRECATED_IN_FUTURE
,
3377 DEPRECATED_WHERE_CLAUSE_LOCATION
,
3378 DUPLICATE_MACRO_ATTRIBUTES
,
3379 ELIDED_LIFETIMES_IN_PATHS
,
3380 EXPORTED_PRIVATE_DEPENDENCIES
,
3382 FORBIDDEN_LINT_GROUPS
,
3383 FUNCTION_ITEM_REFERENCES
,
3384 FUZZY_PROVENANCE_CASTS
,
3385 HIDDEN_GLOB_REEXPORTS
,
3386 ILL_FORMED_ATTRIBUTE_INPUT
,
3387 ILLEGAL_FLOATING_POINT_LITERAL_PATTERN
,
3388 IMPLIED_BOUNDS_ENTAILMENT
,
3390 INDIRECT_STRUCTURAL_MATCH
,
3391 INEFFECTIVE_UNSTABLE_TRAIT_IMPL
,
3394 INVALID_DOC_ATTRIBUTES
,
3395 INVALID_MACRO_EXPORT_ARGUMENTS
,
3396 INVALID_TYPE_PARAM_DEFAULT
,
3397 IRREFUTABLE_LET_PATTERNS
,
3399 LATE_BOUND_LIFETIME_ARGUMENTS
,
3400 LEGACY_DERIVE_HELPERS
,
3401 LONG_RUNNING_CONST_EVAL
,
3402 LOSSY_PROVENANCE_CASTS
,
3403 MACRO_EXPANDED_MACRO_EXPORTS_ACCESSED_BY_ABSOLUTE_PATHS
,
3404 MACRO_USE_EXTERN_CRATE
,
3405 META_VARIABLE_MISUSE
,
3407 MISSING_FRAGMENT_SPECIFIER
,
3409 NAMED_ARGUMENTS_USED_POSITIONALLY
,
3410 NON_EXHAUSTIVE_OMITTED_PATTERNS
,
3411 NONTRIVIAL_STRUCTURAL_MATCH
,
3412 ORDER_DEPENDENT_TRAIT_OBJECTS
,
3413 OVERLAPPING_RANGE_ENDPOINTS
,
3414 PATTERNS_IN_FNS_WITHOUT_BODY
,
3415 POINTER_STRUCTURAL_MATCH
,
3419 PROC_MACRO_BACK_COMPAT
,
3420 PROC_MACRO_DERIVE_RESOLUTION_FALLBACK
,
3421 PUB_USE_OF_PRIVATE_EXTERN_CRATE
,
3422 RENAMED_AND_REMOVED_LINTS
,
3423 REPR_TRANSPARENT_EXTERNAL_PRIVATE_FIELDS
,
3424 RUST_2021_INCOMPATIBLE_CLOSURE_CAPTURES
,
3425 RUST_2021_INCOMPATIBLE_OR_PATTERNS
,
3426 RUST_2021_PREFIXES_INCOMPATIBLE_SYNTAX
,
3427 RUST_2021_PRELUDE_COLLISIONS
,
3428 SEMICOLON_IN_EXPRESSIONS_FROM_MACROS
,
3429 SINGLE_USE_LIFETIMES
,
3432 SUSPICIOUS_AUTO_TRAIT_IMPLS
,
3434 TEXT_DIRECTION_CODEPOINT_IN_COMMENT
,
3436 TRIVIAL_NUMERIC_CASTS
,
3437 TYVAR_BEHIND_RAW_POINTER
,
3438 UNCONDITIONAL_PANIC
,
3439 UNCONDITIONAL_RECURSION
,
3440 UNDEFINED_NAKED_FUNCTION_ABI
,
3441 UNFULFILLED_LINT_EXPECTATIONS
,
3443 UNKNOWN_CRATE_TYPES
,
3444 UNKNOWN_DIAGNOSTIC_ATTRIBUTES
,
3446 UNNAMEABLE_TEST_ITEMS
,
3449 UNREACHABLE_PATTERNS
,
3450 UNSAFE_OP_IN_UNSAFE_FN
,
3451 UNSTABLE_NAME_COLLISIONS
,
3452 UNSTABLE_SYNTAX_PRE_EXPANSION
,
3453 UNSUPPORTED_CALLING_CONVENTIONS
,
3455 UNUSED_ASSOCIATED_TYPE_BOUNDS
,
3457 UNUSED_CRATE_DEPENDENCIES
,
3458 UNUSED_EXTERN_CRATES
,
3466 UNUSED_QUALIFICATIONS
,
3467 UNUSED_TUPLE_STRUCT_FIELDS
,
3472 WHERE_CLAUSES_OBJECT_SAFETY
,
3473 // tidy-alphabetical-end
3478 /// The `long_running_const_eval` lint is emitted when const
3479 /// eval is running for a long time to ensure rustc terminates
3480 /// even if you accidentally wrote an infinite loop.
3484 /// ```rust,compile_fail
3485 /// const FOO: () = loop {};
3492 /// Loops allow const evaluation to compute arbitrary code, but may also
3493 /// cause infinite loops or just very long running computations.
3494 /// Users can enable long running computations by allowing the lint
3495 /// on individual constants or for entire crates.
3497 /// ### Unconditional warnings
3499 /// Note that regardless of whether the lint is allowed or set to warn,
3500 /// the compiler will issue warnings if constant evaluation runs significantly
3501 /// longer than this lint's limit. These warnings are also shown to downstream
3502 /// users from crates.io or similar registries. If you are above the lint's limit,
3503 /// both you and downstream users might be exposed to these warnings.
3504 /// They might also appear on compiler updates, as the compiler makes minor changes
3505 /// about how complexity is measured: staying below the limit ensures that there
3506 /// is enough room, and given that the lint is disabled for people who use your
3507 /// dependency it means you will be the only one to get the warning and can put
3508 /// out an update in your own time.
3509 pub LONG_RUNNING_CONST_EVAL
,
3511 "detects long const eval operations",
3512 report_in_external_macro
3516 /// The `unused_associated_type_bounds` lint is emitted when an
3517 /// associated type bound is added to a trait object, but the associated
3518 /// type has a `where Self: Sized` bound, and is thus unavailable on the
3519 /// trait object anyway.
3525 /// type Bar where Self: Sized;
3527 /// type Mop = dyn Foo<Bar = ()>;
3534 /// Just like methods with `Self: Sized` bounds are unavailable on trait
3535 /// objects, associated types can be removed from the trait object.
3536 pub UNUSED_ASSOCIATED_TYPE_BOUNDS
,
3538 "detects unused `Foo = Bar` bounds in `dyn Trait<Foo = Bar>`"
3542 /// The `unused_doc_comments` lint detects doc comments that aren't used
3556 /// `rustdoc` does not use doc comments in all positions, and so the doc
3557 /// comment will be ignored. Try changing it to a normal comment with `//`
3558 /// to avoid the warning.
3559 pub UNUSED_DOC_COMMENTS
,
3561 "detects doc comments that aren't used by rustdoc"
3565 /// The `rust_2021_incompatible_closure_captures` lint detects variables that aren't completely
3566 /// captured in Rust 2021, such that the `Drop` order of their fields may differ between
3567 /// Rust 2018 and 2021.
3569 /// It can also detect when a variable implements a trait like `Send`, but one of its fields does not,
3570 /// and the field is captured by a closure and used with the assumption that said field implements
3571 /// the same trait as the root variable.
3573 /// ### Example of drop reorder
3575 /// ```rust,edition2018,compile_fail
3576 /// #![deny(rust_2021_incompatible_closure_captures)]
3577 /// # #![allow(unused)]
3579 /// struct FancyInteger(i32);
3581 /// impl Drop for FancyInteger {
3582 /// fn drop(&mut self) {
3583 /// println!("Just dropped {}", self.0);
3587 /// struct Point { x: FancyInteger, y: FancyInteger }
3590 /// let p = Point { x: FancyInteger(10), y: FancyInteger(20) };
3598 /// // ... More code ...
3606 /// In the above example, `p.y` will be dropped at the end of `f` instead of
3607 /// with `c` in Rust 2021.
3609 /// ### Example of auto-trait
3611 /// ```rust,edition2018,compile_fail
3612 /// #![deny(rust_2021_incompatible_closure_captures)]
3613 /// use std::thread;
3615 /// struct Pointer(*mut i32);
3616 /// unsafe impl Send for Pointer {}
3620 /// let fptr = Pointer(&mut f as *mut i32);
3621 /// thread::spawn(move || unsafe {
3631 /// In the above example, only `fptr.0` is captured in Rust 2021.
3632 /// The field is of type `*mut i32`, which doesn't implement `Send`,
3633 /// making the code invalid as the field cannot be sent between threads safely.
3634 pub RUST_2021_INCOMPATIBLE_CLOSURE_CAPTURES
,
3636 "detects closures affected by Rust 2021 changes",
3637 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3638 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::EditionSemanticsChange(Edition
::Edition2021
),
3639 explain_reason
: false,
3643 declare_lint_pass
!(UnusedDocComment
=> [UNUSED_DOC_COMMENTS
]);
3646 /// The `missing_abi` lint detects cases where the ABI is omitted from
3647 /// extern declarations.
3651 /// ```rust,compile_fail
3652 /// #![deny(missing_abi)]
3654 /// extern fn foo() {}
3661 /// Historically, Rust implicitly selected C as the ABI for extern
3662 /// declarations. We expect to add new ABIs, like `C-unwind`, in the future,
3663 /// though this has not yet happened, and especially with their addition
3664 /// seeing the ABI easily will make code review easier.
3667 "No declared ABI for extern declaration"
3671 /// The `invalid_doc_attributes` lint detects when the `#[doc(...)]` is
3676 /// ```rust,compile_fail
3677 /// #![deny(warnings)]
3679 /// pub mod submodule {
3680 /// #![doc(test(no_crate_inject))]
3688 /// Previously, incorrect usage of the `#[doc(..)]` attribute was not
3689 /// being validated. Usually these should be rejected as a hard error,
3690 /// but this lint was introduced to avoid breaking any existing
3691 /// crates which included them.
3693 /// This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a hard
3694 /// error in the future. See [issue #82730] for more details.
3696 /// [issue #82730]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82730
3697 pub INVALID_DOC_ATTRIBUTES
,
3699 "detects invalid `#[doc(...)]` attributes",
3700 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3701 reference
: "issue #82730 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82730>",
3706 /// The `proc_macro_back_compat` lint detects uses of old versions of certain
3707 /// proc-macro crates, which have hardcoded workarounds in the compiler.
3711 /// ```rust,ignore (needs-dependency)
3713 /// use time_macros_impl::impl_macros;
3715 /// impl_macros!(Foo);
3718 /// This will produce:
3721 /// warning: using an old version of `time-macros-impl`
3722 /// ::: $DIR/group-compat-hack.rs:27:5
3724 /// LL | impl_macros!(Foo);
3725 /// | ------------------ in this macro invocation
3727 /// = note: `#[warn(proc_macro_back_compat)]` on by default
3728 /// = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
3729 /// = note: for more information, see issue #83125 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83125>
3730 /// = note: the `time-macros-impl` crate will stop compiling in futures version of Rust. Please update to the latest version of the `time` crate to avoid breakage
3731 /// = note: this warning originates in a macro (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
3736 /// Eventually, the backwards-compatibility hacks present in the compiler will be removed,
3737 /// causing older versions of certain crates to stop compiling.
3738 /// This is a [future-incompatible] lint to ease the transition to an error.
3739 /// See [issue #83125] for more details.
3741 /// [issue #83125]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83125
3742 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
3743 pub PROC_MACRO_BACK_COMPAT
,
3745 "detects usage of old versions of certain proc-macro crates",
3746 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3747 reference
: "issue #83125 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83125>",
3748 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::FutureReleaseErrorReportNow
,
3753 /// The `rust_2021_incompatible_or_patterns` lint detects usage of old versions of or-patterns.
3757 /// ```rust,compile_fail
3758 /// #![deny(rust_2021_incompatible_or_patterns)]
3760 /// macro_rules! match_any {
3761 /// ( $expr:expr , $( $( $pat:pat )|+ => $expr_arm:expr ),+ ) => {
3764 /// $( $pat => $expr_arm, )+
3771 /// let result: Result<i64, i32> = Err(42);
3772 /// let int: i64 = match_any!(result, Ok(i) | Err(i) => i.into());
3773 /// assert_eq!(int, 42);
3781 /// In Rust 2021, the `pat` matcher will match additional patterns, which include the `|` character.
3782 pub RUST_2021_INCOMPATIBLE_OR_PATTERNS
,
3784 "detects usage of old versions of or-patterns",
3785 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3786 reference
: "<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/edition-guide/rust-2021/or-patterns-macro-rules.html>",
3787 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::EditionError(Edition
::Edition2021
),
3792 /// The `rust_2021_prelude_collisions` lint detects the usage of trait methods which are ambiguous
3793 /// with traits added to the prelude in future editions.
3797 /// ```rust,compile_fail
3798 /// #![deny(rust_2021_prelude_collisions)]
3801 /// fn try_into(self) -> Result<String, !>;
3804 /// impl Foo for &str {
3805 /// fn try_into(self) -> Result<String, !> {
3806 /// Ok(String::from(self))
3811 /// let x: String = "3".try_into().unwrap();
3813 /// // This call to try_into matches both Foo::try_into and TryInto::try_into as
3814 /// // `TryInto` has been added to the Rust prelude in 2021 edition.
3815 /// println!("{x}");
3823 /// In Rust 2021, one of the important introductions is the [prelude changes], which add
3824 /// `TryFrom`, `TryInto`, and `FromIterator` into the standard library's prelude. Since this
3825 /// results in an ambiguity as to which method/function to call when an existing `try_into`
3826 /// method is called via dot-call syntax or a `try_from`/`from_iter` associated function
3827 /// is called directly on a type.
3829 /// [prelude changes]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2021/03/04/planning-rust-2021.html#prelude-changes
3830 pub RUST_2021_PRELUDE_COLLISIONS
,
3832 "detects the usage of trait methods which are ambiguous with traits added to the \
3833 prelude in future editions",
3834 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3835 reference
: "<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/edition-guide/rust-2021/prelude.html>",
3836 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::EditionError(Edition
::Edition2021
),
3841 /// The `rust_2021_prefixes_incompatible_syntax` lint detects identifiers that will be parsed as a
3842 /// prefix instead in Rust 2021.
3846 /// ```rust,edition2018,compile_fail
3847 /// #![deny(rust_2021_prefixes_incompatible_syntax)]
3849 /// macro_rules! m {
3850 /// (z $x:expr) => ();
3860 /// In Rust 2015 and 2018, `z"hey"` is two tokens: the identifier `z`
3861 /// followed by the string literal `"hey"`. In Rust 2021, the `z` is
3862 /// considered a prefix for `"hey"`.
3864 /// This lint suggests to add whitespace between the `z` and `"hey"` tokens
3865 /// to keep them separated in Rust 2021.
3866 // Allow this lint -- rustdoc doesn't yet support threading edition into this lint's parser.
3867 #[allow(rustdoc::invalid_rust_codeblocks)]
3868 pub RUST_2021_PREFIXES_INCOMPATIBLE_SYNTAX
,
3870 "identifiers that will be parsed as a prefix in Rust 2021",
3871 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3872 reference
: "<https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/edition-guide/rust-2021/reserving-syntax.html>",
3873 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::EditionError(Edition
::Edition2021
),
3879 /// The `unsupported_calling_conventions` lint is output whenever there is a use of the
3880 /// `stdcall`, `fastcall`, `thiscall`, `vectorcall` calling conventions (or their unwind
3881 /// variants) on targets that cannot meaningfully be supported for the requested target.
3883 /// For example `stdcall` does not make much sense for a x86_64 or, more apparently, powerpc
3884 /// code, because this calling convention was never specified for those targets.
3886 /// Historically MSVC toolchains have fallen back to the regular C calling convention for
3887 /// targets other than x86, but Rust doesn't really see a similar need to introduce a similar
3888 /// hack across many more targets.
3892 /// ```rust,ignore (needs specific targets)
3893 /// extern "stdcall" fn stdcall() {}
3896 /// This will produce:
3899 /// warning: use of calling convention not supported on this target
3900 /// --> $DIR/unsupported.rs:39:1
3902 /// LL | extern "stdcall" fn stdcall() {}
3903 /// | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
3905 /// = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
3906 /// = warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out;
3907 /// it will become a hard error in a future release!
3908 /// = note: for more information, see issue ...
3913 /// On most of the targets the behaviour of `stdcall` and similar calling conventions is not
3914 /// defined at all, but was previously accepted due to a bug in the implementation of the
3916 pub UNSUPPORTED_CALLING_CONVENTIONS
,
3918 "use of unsupported calling convention",
3919 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
3920 reference
: "issue #87678 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87678>",
3925 /// The `break_with_label_and_loop` lint detects labeled `break` expressions with
3926 /// an unlabeled loop as their value expression.
3932 /// break 'label loop { break 42; };
3940 /// In Rust, loops can have a label, and `break` expressions can refer to that label to
3941 /// break out of specific loops (and not necessarily the innermost one). `break` expressions
3942 /// can also carry a value expression, which can be another loop. A labeled `break` with an
3943 /// unlabeled loop as its value expression is easy to confuse with an unlabeled break with
3944 /// a labeled loop and is thus discouraged (but allowed for compatibility); use parentheses
3945 /// around the loop expression to silence this warning. Unlabeled `break` expressions with
3946 /// labeled loops yield a hard error, which can also be silenced by wrapping the expression
3948 pub BREAK_WITH_LABEL_AND_LOOP
,
3950 "`break` expression with label and unlabeled loop as value expression"
3954 /// The `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` lint detects when a wildcard (`_` or `..`) in a
3955 /// pattern for a `#[non_exhaustive]` struct or enum is reachable.
3959 /// ```rust,ignore (needs separate crate)
3961 /// #[non_exhaustive]
3964 /// B, // added variant in non breaking change
3968 /// #![feature(non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint)]
3971 /// #[warn(non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns)]
3976 /// This will produce:
3979 /// warning: reachable patterns not covered of non exhaustive enum
3980 /// --> $DIR/reachable-patterns.rs:70:9
3983 /// | ^ pattern `B` not covered
3985 /// note: the lint level is defined here
3986 /// --> $DIR/reachable-patterns.rs:69:16
3988 /// LL | #[warn(non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns)]
3989 /// | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
3990 /// = help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding the suggested match arms
3991 /// = note: the matched value is of type `Bar` and the `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` attribute was found
3996 /// Structs and enums tagged with `#[non_exhaustive]` force the user to add a
3997 /// (potentially redundant) wildcard when pattern-matching, to allow for future
3998 /// addition of fields or variants. The `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` lint
3999 /// detects when such a wildcard happens to actually catch some fields/variants.
4000 /// In other words, when the match without the wildcard would not be exhaustive.
4001 /// This lets the user be informed if new fields/variants were added.
4002 pub NON_EXHAUSTIVE_OMITTED_PATTERNS
,
4004 "detect when patterns of types marked `non_exhaustive` are missed",
4005 @feature_gate
= sym
::non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint
;
4009 /// The `text_direction_codepoint_in_comment` lint detects Unicode codepoints in comments that
4010 /// change the visual representation of text on screen in a way that does not correspond to
4011 /// their on memory representation.
4015 /// ```rust,compile_fail
4016 /// #![deny(text_direction_codepoint_in_comment)]
4018 /// println!("{:?}"); // '‮');
4026 /// Unicode allows changing the visual flow of text on screen in order to support scripts that
4027 /// are written right-to-left, but a specially crafted comment can make code that will be
4028 /// compiled appear to be part of a comment, depending on the software used to read the code.
4029 /// To avoid potential problems or confusion, such as in CVE-2021-42574, by default we deny
4031 pub TEXT_DIRECTION_CODEPOINT_IN_COMMENT
,
4033 "invisible directionality-changing codepoints in comment"
4037 /// The `duplicate_macro_attributes` lint detects when a `#[test]`-like built-in macro
4038 /// attribute is duplicated on an item. This lint may trigger on `bench`, `cfg_eval`, `test`
4039 /// and `test_case`.
4043 /// ```rust,ignore (needs --test)
4049 /// This will produce:
4052 /// warning: duplicated attribute
4053 /// --> src/lib.rs:2:1
4058 /// = note: `#[warn(duplicate_macro_attributes)]` on by default
4063 /// A duplicated attribute may erroneously originate from a copy-paste and the effect of it
4064 /// being duplicated may not be obvious or desirable.
4066 /// For instance, doubling the `#[test]` attributes registers the test to be run twice with no
4067 /// change to its environment.
4069 /// [issue #90979]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90979
4070 pub DUPLICATE_MACRO_ATTRIBUTES
,
4072 "duplicated attribute"
4076 /// The `suspicious_auto_trait_impls` lint checks for potentially incorrect
4077 /// implementations of auto traits.
4082 /// struct Foo<T>(T);
4084 /// unsafe impl<T> Send for Foo<*const T> {}
4091 /// A type can implement auto traits, e.g. `Send`, `Sync` and `Unpin`,
4092 /// in two different ways: either by writing an explicit impl or if
4093 /// all fields of the type implement that auto trait.
4095 /// The compiler disables the automatic implementation if an explicit one
4096 /// exists for given type constructor. The exact rules governing this
4097 /// were previously unsound, quite subtle, and have been recently modified.
4098 /// This change caused the automatic implementation to be disabled in more
4099 /// cases, potentially breaking some code.
4100 pub SUSPICIOUS_AUTO_TRAIT_IMPLS
,
4102 "the rules governing auto traits have recently changed resulting in potential breakage",
4103 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
4104 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::FutureReleaseSemanticsChange
,
4105 reference
: "issue #93367 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93367>",
4110 /// The `deprecated_where_clause_location` lint detects when a where clause in front of the equals
4111 /// in an associated type.
4117 /// type Assoc<'a> where Self: 'a;
4120 /// impl Trait for () {
4121 /// type Assoc<'a> where Self: 'a = ();
4129 /// The preferred location for where clauses on associated types
4130 /// is after the type. However, for most of generic associated types development,
4131 /// it was only accepted before the equals. To provide a transition period and
4132 /// further evaluate this change, both are currently accepted. At some point in
4133 /// the future, this may be disallowed at an edition boundary; but, that is
4134 /// undecided currently.
4135 pub DEPRECATED_WHERE_CLAUSE_LOCATION
,
4137 "deprecated where clause location"
4141 /// The `test_unstable_lint` lint tests unstable lints and is perma-unstable.
4146 /// #![allow(test_unstable_lint)]
4153 /// In order to test the behavior of unstable lints, a permanently-unstable
4154 /// lint is required. This lint can be used to trigger warnings and errors
4155 /// from the compiler related to unstable lints.
4156 pub TEST_UNSTABLE_LINT
,
4158 "this unstable lint is only for testing",
4159 @feature_gate
= sym
::test_unstable_lint
;
4163 /// The `ffi_unwind_calls` lint detects calls to foreign functions or function pointers with
4164 /// `C-unwind` or other FFI-unwind ABIs.
4169 /// #![warn(ffi_unwind_calls)]
4171 /// extern "C-unwind" {
4176 /// unsafe { foo(); }
4177 /// let ptr: unsafe extern "C-unwind" fn() = foo;
4178 /// unsafe { ptr(); }
4186 /// For crates containing such calls, if they are compiled with `-C panic=unwind` then the
4187 /// produced library cannot be linked with crates compiled with `-C panic=abort`. For crates
4188 /// that desire this ability it is therefore necessary to avoid such calls.
4189 pub FFI_UNWIND_CALLS
,
4191 "call to foreign functions or function pointers with FFI-unwind ABI"
4195 /// The `named_arguments_used_positionally` lint detects cases where named arguments are only
4196 /// used positionally in format strings. This usage is valid but potentially very confusing.
4200 /// ```rust,compile_fail
4201 /// #![deny(named_arguments_used_positionally)]
4204 /// println!("{}", _x = 1); // Prints 1, will trigger lint
4206 /// println!("{}", _x); // Prints 5, no lint emitted
4207 /// println!("{_x}", _x = _x); // Prints 5, no lint emitted
4215 /// Rust formatting strings can refer to named arguments by their position, but this usage is
4216 /// potentially confusing. In particular, readers can incorrectly assume that the declaration
4217 /// of named arguments is an assignment (which would produce the unit type).
4218 /// For backwards compatibility, this is not a hard error.
4219 pub NAMED_ARGUMENTS_USED_POSITIONALLY
,
4221 "named arguments in format used positionally"
4225 /// The `implied_bounds_entailment` lint detects cases where the arguments of an impl method
4226 /// have stronger implied bounds than those from the trait method it's implementing.
4230 /// ```rust,compile_fail
4231 /// #![deny(implied_bounds_entailment)]
4234 /// fn get<'s>(s: &'s str, _: &'static &'static ()) -> &'static str;
4237 /// impl Trait for () {
4238 /// fn get<'s>(s: &'s str, _: &'static &'s ()) -> &'static str {
4243 /// let val = <() as Trait>::get(&String::from("blah blah blah"), &&());
4244 /// println!("{}", val);
4251 /// Neither the trait method, which provides no implied bounds about `'s`, nor the impl,
4252 /// requires the main function to prove that 's: 'static, but the impl method is allowed
4253 /// to assume that `'s: 'static` within its own body.
4255 /// This can be used to implement an unsound API if used incorrectly.
4256 pub IMPLIED_BOUNDS_ENTAILMENT
,
4258 "impl method assumes more implied bounds than its corresponding trait method",
4259 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
4260 reference
: "issue #105572 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105572>",
4261 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::FutureReleaseErrorReportNow
,
4266 /// The `byte_slice_in_packed_struct_with_derive` lint detects cases where a byte slice field
4267 /// (`[u8]`) or string slice field (`str`) is used in a `packed` struct that derives one or
4268 /// more built-in traits.
4275 /// struct FlexZeroSlice {
4285 /// This was previously accepted but is being phased out, because fields in packed structs are
4286 /// now required to implement `Copy` for `derive` to work. Byte slices and string slices are a
4287 /// temporary exception because certain crates depended on them.
4288 pub BYTE_SLICE_IN_PACKED_STRUCT_WITH_DERIVE
,
4290 "`[u8]` or `str` used in a packed struct with `derive`",
4291 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
4292 reference
: "issue #107457 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/107457>",
4293 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::FutureReleaseErrorReportNow
,
4295 report_in_external_macro
4299 /// The `invalid_macro_export_arguments` lint detects cases where `#[macro_export]` is being used with invalid arguments.
4303 /// ```rust,compile_fail
4304 /// #![deny(invalid_macro_export_arguments)]
4306 /// #[macro_export(invalid_parameter)]
4307 /// macro_rules! myMacro {
4313 /// #[macro_export(too, many, items)]
4320 /// The only valid argument is `#[macro_export(local_inner_macros)]` or no argument (`#[macro_export]`).
4321 /// You can't have multiple arguments in a `#[macro_export(..)]`, or mention arguments other than `local_inner_macros`.
4323 pub INVALID_MACRO_EXPORT_ARGUMENTS
,
4325 "\"invalid_parameter\" isn't a valid argument for `#[macro_export]`",
4329 /// The `private_interfaces` lint detects types in a primary interface of an item,
4330 /// that are more private than the item itself. Primary interface of an item is all
4331 /// its interface except for bounds on generic parameters and where clauses.
4335 /// ```rust,compile_fail
4336 /// # #![feature(type_privacy_lints)]
4337 /// # #![allow(unused)]
4338 /// # #![allow(private_in_public)]
4339 /// #![deny(private_interfaces)]
4340 /// struct SemiPriv;
4344 /// impl crate::SemiPriv {
4345 /// pub fn f(_: Priv) {}
4356 /// Having something private in primary interface guarantees that
4357 /// the item will be unusable from outer modules due to type privacy.
4358 pub PRIVATE_INTERFACES
,
4360 "private type in primary interface of an item",
4361 @feature_gate
= sym
::type_privacy_lints
;
4365 /// The `private_bounds` lint detects types in a secondary interface of an item,
4366 /// that are more private than the item itself. Secondary interface of an item consists of
4367 /// bounds on generic parameters and where clauses, including supertraits for trait items.
4371 /// ```rust,compile_fail
4372 /// # #![feature(type_privacy_lints)]
4373 /// # #![allow(private_in_public)]
4374 /// # #![allow(unused)]
4375 /// #![deny(private_bounds)]
4388 /// Having private types or traits in item bounds makes it less clear what interface
4389 /// the item actually provides.
4392 "private type in secondary interface of an item",
4393 @feature_gate
= sym
::type_privacy_lints
;
4397 /// The `unnameable_types` lint detects types for which you can get objects of that type,
4398 /// but cannot name the type itself.
4402 /// ```rust,compile_fail
4403 /// # #![feature(type_privacy_lints)]
4404 /// # #![allow(unused)]
4405 /// #![deny(unnameable_types)]
4410 /// pub fn get_voldemort() -> m::S { m::S }
4418 /// It is often expected that if you can obtain an object of type `T`, then
4419 /// you can name the type `T` as well, this lint attempts to enforce this rule.
4420 pub UNNAMEABLE_TYPES
,
4422 "effective visibility of a type is larger than the area in which it can be named",
4423 @feature_gate
= sym
::type_privacy_lints
;
4427 /// The `coinductive_overlap_in_coherence` lint detects impls which are currently
4428 /// considered not overlapping, but may be considered to overlap if support for
4429 /// coinduction is added to the trait solver.
4433 /// ```rust,compile_fail
4434 /// #![deny(coinductive_overlap_in_coherence)]
4436 /// trait CyclicTrait {}
4437 /// impl<T: CyclicTrait> CyclicTrait for T {}
4440 /// impl<T: CyclicTrait> Trait for T {}
4441 /// // conflicting impl with the above
4442 /// impl Trait for u8 {}
4449 /// We have two choices for impl which satisfy `u8: Trait`: the blanket impl
4450 /// for generic `T`, and the direct impl for `u8`. These two impls nominally
4451 /// overlap, since we can infer `T = u8` in the former impl, but since the where
4452 /// clause `u8: CyclicTrait` would end up resulting in a cycle (since it depends
4453 /// on itself), the blanket impl is not considered to hold for `u8`. This will
4454 /// change in a future release.
4455 pub COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE
,
4457 "impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to \
4458 overlap in the future",
4459 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
4460 reference
: "issue #114040 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114040>",
4465 /// The `unknown_diagnostic_attributes` lint detects unrecognized diagnostic attributes.
4470 /// #![feature(diagnostic_namespace)]
4471 /// #[diagnostic::does_not_exist]
4479 /// It is usually a mistake to specify a diagnostic attribute that does not exist. Check
4480 /// the spelling, and check the diagnostic attribute listing for the correct name. Also
4481 /// consider if you are using an old version of the compiler, and the attribute
4482 /// is only available in a newer version.
4483 pub UNKNOWN_DIAGNOSTIC_ATTRIBUTES
,
4485 "unrecognized diagnostic attribute"
4489 /// The `ambiguous_glob_imports` lint detects glob imports that should report ambiguity
4490 /// errors, but previously didn't do that due to rustc bugs.
4494 /// ```rust,compile_fail
4496 /// #![deny(ambiguous_glob_imports)]
4497 /// pub fn foo() -> u32 {
4503 /// mod mod1 { pub const C: u32 = 1; }
4504 /// mod mod2 { pub const C: u32 = 2; }
4506 /// pub use mod1::*;
4507 /// pub use mod2::*;
4515 /// Previous versions of Rust compile it successfully because it
4516 /// had lost the ambiguity error when resolve `use sub::mod2::*`.
4518 /// This is a [future-incompatible] lint to transition this to a
4519 /// hard error in the future.
4521 /// [future-incompatible]: ../index.md#future-incompatible-lints
4522 pub AMBIGUOUS_GLOB_IMPORTS
,
4524 "detects certain glob imports that require reporting an ambiguity error",
4525 @future_incompatible
= FutureIncompatibleInfo
{
4526 reason
: FutureIncompatibilityReason
::FutureReleaseError
,
4527 reference
: "issue #114095 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114095>",