virtio: fix vring_align() on 64-bit windows

[mirror_qemu.git] / CODING_STYLE

diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
index 6e61c490894e244e7b8bc3c8553de9cae8cc9ead..2fa0c0b65b6c1315202741193b725b537f2bf2ff 100644 (file)
--- a/CODING_STYLE
+++ b/CODING_STYLE
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Qemu Coding Style
+QEMU Coding Style
 =================
 
 Please use the script checkpatch.pl in the scripts directory to check
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ patches before submitting.
 Of course, the most important aspect in any coding style is whitespace.
 Crusty old coders who have trouble spotting the glasses on their noses
 can tell the difference between a tab and eight spaces from a distance
-of approximately fifteen parsecs.  Many a flamewar have been fought and
+of approximately fifteen parsecs.  Many a flamewar has been fought and
 lost on this issue.
 
 QEMU indents are four spaces.  Tabs are never used, except in Makefiles
@@ -31,7 +31,11 @@ Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines.
 
 2. Line width
 
-Lines are 80 characters; not longer.
+Lines should be 80 characters; try not to make them longer.
+
+Sometimes it is hard to do, especially when dealing with QEMU subsystems
+that use long function or symbol names.  Even in that case, do not make
+lines much longer than 80 characters.
 
 Rationale:
  - Some people like to tile their 24" screens with a 6x4 matrix of 80x24
@@ -39,12 +43,15 @@ Rationale:
    let them keep doing it.
  - Code and especially patches is much more readable if limited to a sane
    line length.  Eighty is traditional.
+ - The four-space indentation makes the most common excuse ("But look
+   at all that white space on the left!") moot.
  - It is the QEMU coding style.
 
 3. Naming
 
 Variables are lower_case_with_underscores; easy to type and read.  Structured
-type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out.  Scalar type
+type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out.  Enum type
+names and function type names should also be in CamelCase.  Scalar type
 names are lower_case_with_underscores_ending_with_a_t, like the POSIX
 uint64_t and family.  Note that this last convention contradicts POSIX
 and is therefore likely to be changed.
@@ -83,3 +90,36 @@ and clarity it comes on a line by itself:
 Rationale: a consistent (except for functions...) bracing style reduces
 ambiguity and avoids needless churn when lines are added or removed.
 Furthermore, it is the QEMU coding style.
+
+5. Declarations
+
+Mixed declarations (interleaving statements and declarations within
+blocks) are generally not allowed; declarations should be at the beginning
+of blocks.
+
+Every now and then, an exception is made for declarations inside a
+#ifdef or #ifndef block: if the code looks nicer, such declarations can
+be placed at the top of the block even if there are statements above.
+On the other hand, however, it's often best to move that #ifdef/#ifndef
+block to a separate function altogether.
+
+6. Conditional statements
+
+When comparing a variable for (in)equality with a constant, list the
+constant on the right, as in:
+
+if (a == 1) {
+    /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */
+    do_something();
+}
+
+Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read.
+Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=',
+even when the constant is on the right.
+
+7. Comment style
+
+We use traditional C-style /* */ comments and avoid // comments.
+
+Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of
+consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this.