hw/ppc/spapr: Move code related to "ibm,pa-features" to a separate function

[mirror_qemu.git] / docs / atomics.txt

diff --git a/docs/atomics.txt b/docs/atomics.txt
index ef285e3c2a1c931e9eedc7e6f39a7922b0f33e78..c95950b6c525639637177900223bf9ee7ecfa747 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/atomics.txt
+++ b/docs/atomics.txt
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ operations:
     typeof(*ptr) atomic_fetch_sub(ptr, val)
     typeof(*ptr) atomic_fetch_and(ptr, val)
     typeof(*ptr) atomic_fetch_or(ptr, val)
-    typeof(*ptr) atomic_xchg(ptr, val
+    typeof(*ptr) atomic_xchg(ptr, val)
     typeof(*ptr) atomic_cmpxchg(ptr, old, new)
 
 all of which return the old value of *ptr.  These operations are
@@ -326,21 +326,41 @@ and memory barriers, and the equivalents in QEMU:
   use a boxed atomic_t type; atomic operations in QEMU are polymorphic
   and use normal C types.
 
-- atomic_read and atomic_set in Linux give no guarantee at all;
-  atomic_read and atomic_set in QEMU include a compiler barrier
-  (similar to the ACCESS_ONCE macro in Linux).
+- Originally, atomic_read and atomic_set in Linux gave no guarantee
+  at all. Linux 4.1 updated them to implement volatile
+  semantics via ACCESS_ONCE (or the more recent READ/WRITE_ONCE).
 
-- most atomic read-modify-write operations in Linux return void;
-  in QEMU, all of them return the old value of the variable.
+  QEMU's atomic_read/set implement, if the compiler supports it, C11
+  atomic relaxed semantics, and volatile semantics otherwise.
+  Both semantics prevent the compiler from doing certain transformations;
+  the difference is that atomic accesses are guaranteed to be atomic,
+  while volatile accesses aren't. Thus, in the volatile case we just cross
+  our fingers hoping that the compiler will generate atomic accesses,
+  since we assume the variables passed are machine-word sized and
+  properly aligned.
+  No barriers are implied by atomic_read/set in either Linux or QEMU.
+
+- atomic read-modify-write operations in Linux are of three kinds:
+
+         atomic_OP          returns void
+         atomic_OP_return   returns new value of the variable
+         atomic_fetch_OP    returns the old value of the variable
+         atomic_cmpxchg     returns the old value of the variable
+
+  In QEMU, the second kind does not exist.  Currently Linux has
+  atomic_fetch_or only.  QEMU provides and, or, inc, dec, add, sub.
 
 - different atomic read-modify-write operations in Linux imply
   a different set of memory barriers; in QEMU, all of them enforce
   sequential consistency, which means they imply full memory barriers
   before and after the operation.
 
-- Linux does not have an equivalent of atomic_mb_read() and
-  atomic_mb_set().  In particular, note that set_mb() is a little
-  weaker than atomic_mb_set().
+- Linux does not have an equivalent of atomic_mb_set().  In particular,
+  note that smp_store_mb() is a little weaker than atomic_mb_set().
+  atomic_mb_read() compiles to the same instructions as Linux's
+  smp_load_acquire(), but this should be treated as an implementation
+  detail.  If required, QEMU might later add atomic_load_acquire() and
+  atomic_store_release() macros.
 
 
 SOURCES