--- /dev/null
+//! Lint on if expressions with an else if, but without a final else branch.
+
+use rustc_ast::ast::{Expr, ExprKind};
+use rustc_lint::{EarlyContext, EarlyLintPass, LintContext};
+use rustc_middle::lint::in_external_macro;
+use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
+
+use crate::utils::span_lint_and_help;
+
+declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// **What it does:** Checks for usage of if expressions with an `else if` branch,
+ /// but without a final `else` branch.
+ ///
+ /// **Why is this bad?** Some coding guidelines require this (e.g., MISRA-C:2004 Rule 14.10).
+ ///
+ /// **Known problems:** None.
+ ///
+ /// **Example:**
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # fn a() {}
+ /// # fn b() {}
+ /// # let x: i32 = 1;
+ /// if x.is_positive() {
+ /// a();
+ /// } else if x.is_negative() {
+ /// b();
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ ///
+ /// Could be written:
+ ///
+ /// ```rust
+ /// # fn a() {}
+ /// # fn b() {}
+ /// # let x: i32 = 1;
+ /// if x.is_positive() {
+ /// a();
+ /// } else if x.is_negative() {
+ /// b();
+ /// } else {
+ /// // We don't care about zero.
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ pub ELSE_IF_WITHOUT_ELSE,
+ restriction,
+ "`if` expression with an `else if`, but without a final `else` branch"
+}
+
+declare_lint_pass!(ElseIfWithoutElse => [ELSE_IF_WITHOUT_ELSE]);
+
+impl EarlyLintPass for ElseIfWithoutElse {
+ fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, mut item: &Expr) {
+ if in_external_macro(cx.sess(), item.span) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ while let ExprKind::If(_, _, Some(ref els)) = item.kind {
+ if let ExprKind::If(_, _, None) = els.kind {
+ span_lint_and_help(
+ cx,
+ ELSE_IF_WITHOUT_ELSE,
+ els.span,
+ "`if` expression with an `else if`, but without a final `else`",
+ None,
+ "add an `else` block here",
+ );
+ }
+
+ item = els;
+ }
+ }
+}