-error: writing `&Vec<_>` instead of `&[_]` involves one more reference and cannot be used with non-Vec-based slices.
+error: writing `&Vec<_>` instead of `&[_]` involves one more reference and cannot be used with non-Vec-based slices
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:7:14
|
LL | fn do_vec(x: &Vec<i64>) {
|
= note: `-D clippy::ptr-arg` implied by `-D warnings`
-error: writing `&String` instead of `&str` involves a new object where a slice will do.
+error: writing `&String` instead of `&str` involves a new object where a slice will do
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:16:14
|
LL | fn do_str(x: &String) {
| ^^^^^^^ help: change this to: `&str`
-error: writing `&PathBuf` instead of `&Path` involves a new object where a slice will do.
+error: writing `&PathBuf` instead of `&Path` involves a new object where a slice will do
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:25:15
|
LL | fn do_path(x: &PathBuf) {
| ^^^^^^^^ help: change this to: `&Path`
-error: writing `&Vec<_>` instead of `&[_]` involves one more reference and cannot be used with non-Vec-based slices.
+error: writing `&Vec<_>` instead of `&[_]` involves one more reference and cannot be used with non-Vec-based slices
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:38:18
|
LL | fn do_vec(x: &Vec<i64>);
| ^^^^^^^^^ help: change this to: `&[i64]`
-error: writing `&Vec<_>` instead of `&[_]` involves one more reference and cannot be used with non-Vec-based slices.
+error: writing `&Vec<_>` instead of `&[_]` involves one more reference and cannot be used with non-Vec-based slices
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:51:14
|
LL | fn cloned(x: &Vec<u8>) -> Vec<u8> {
LL | x.to_owned()
|
-error: writing `&String` instead of `&str` involves a new object where a slice will do.
+error: writing `&String` instead of `&str` involves a new object where a slice will do
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:60:18
|
LL | fn str_cloned(x: &String) -> String {
LL | x.to_string()
|
-error: writing `&PathBuf` instead of `&Path` involves a new object where a slice will do.
+error: writing `&PathBuf` instead of `&Path` involves a new object where a slice will do
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:68:19
|
LL | fn path_cloned(x: &PathBuf) -> PathBuf {
LL | x.to_path_buf()
|
-error: writing `&String` instead of `&str` involves a new object where a slice will do.
+error: writing `&String` instead of `&str` involves a new object where a slice will do
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:76:44
|
LL | fn false_positive_capacity(x: &Vec<u8>, y: &String) {
LL | let c = y;
| ^
-error: using a reference to `Cow` is not recommended.
+error: using a reference to `Cow` is not recommended
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:90:25
|
LL | fn test_cow_with_ref(c: &Cow<[i32]>) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: change this to: `&[i32]`
-error: writing `&Vec<_>` instead of `&[_]` involves one more reference and cannot be used with non-Vec-based slices.
+error: writing `&Vec<_>` instead of `&[_]` involves one more reference and cannot be used with non-Vec-based slices
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:143:21
|
LL | fn foo_vec(vec: &Vec<u8>) {
LL | let _ = vec.to_owned().clone();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-error: writing `&PathBuf` instead of `&Path` involves a new object where a slice will do.
+error: writing `&PathBuf` instead of `&Path` involves a new object where a slice will do
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:148:23
|
LL | fn foo_path(path: &PathBuf) {
LL | let _ = path.to_path_buf().clone();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-error: writing `&PathBuf` instead of `&Path` involves a new object where a slice will do.
+error: writing `&PathBuf` instead of `&Path` involves a new object where a slice will do
--> $DIR/ptr_arg.rs:153:21
|
LL | fn foo_str(str: &PathBuf) {