block: Add BDS.auto_backing_file

block: Add BDS.auto_backing_file

If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the
guest-visible data of a BDS.  Therefore, we will need to consider this
in bdrv_refresh_filename().

To see whether it has been overridden, we might want to compare
bs->backing_file and bs->backing->bs->filename.  However,
bs->backing_file is changed by bdrv_set_backing_hd() (which is just used
to change the backing child at runtime, without modifying the image
header), so bs->backing_file most of the time simply contains a copy of
bs->backing->bs->filename anyway, so it is useless for such a
comparison.

This patch adds an auto_backing_file BDS field which contains the
backing file path as indicated by the image header, which is not changed
by bdrv_set_backing_hd().

Because of bdrv_refresh_filename() magic, however, a BDS's filename may
differ from what has been specified during bdrv_open().  Then, the
comparison between bs->auto_backing_file and bs->backing->bs->filename
may fail even though bs->backing was opened from bs->auto_backing_file.
To mitigate this, we can copy the real BDS's filename (after the whole
bdrv_open() and bdrv_refresh_filename() process) into
bs->auto_backing_file, if we know the former has been opened based on
the latter.  This is only possible if no options modifying the backing
file's behavior have been specified, though.  To simplify things, this
patch only copies the filename from the backing file if no options have
been specified for it at all.

Furthermore, there are cases where an overlay is created by qemu which
already contains a BDS's filename (e.g. in blockdev-snapshot-sync).  We
do not need to worry about updating the overlay's bs->auto_backing_file
there, because we actually wrote a post-bdrv_refresh_filename() filename
into the image header.

So all in all, there will be false negatives where (as of a future
patch) bdrv_refresh_filename() will assume that the backing file differs
from what was specified in the image header, even though it really does
not.  However, these cases should be limited to where (1) the user
actually did override something in the backing chain (e.g. by specifying
options for the backing file), or (2) the user executed a QMP command to
change some node's backing file (e.g. change-backing-file or
block-commit with @backing-file given) where the given filename does not
happen to coincide with qemu's idea of the backing BDS's filename.

Then again, (1) really is limited to -drive.  With -blockdev or
blockdev-add, you have to adhere to the schema, so a user cannot give
partial "unimportant" options (e.g. by just setting backing.node-name
and leaving the rest to the image header).  Therefore, trying to fix
this would mean trying to fix something for -drive only.

To improve on (2), we would need a full infrastructure to "canonicalize"
an arbitrary filename (+ options), so it can be compared against
another.  That seems a bit over the top, considering that filenames
nowadays are there mostly for the user's entertainment.

Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Message-id: 20190201192935.18394-5-mreitz@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>