Btrfs: fix memory corruption on failure to submit bio for direct IO

Btrfs: fix memory corruption on failure to submit bio for direct IO

If we fail to submit a bio for a direct IO request, we were grabbing the
corresponding ordered extent and decrementing its reference count twice,
once for our lookup reference and once for the ordered tree reference.
This was a problem because it caused the ordered extent to be freed
without removing it from the ordered tree and any lists it might be
attached to, leaving dangling pointers to the ordered extent around.
Example trace with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y:

[161779.858707] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000087654330
[161779.859983] IP: [<ffffffff8124ca68>] rb_prev+0x22/0x3b
[161779.860636] PGD 34d818067 PUD 0
[161779.860636] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
(...)
[161779.860636] Call Trace:
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06b36a6>] __tree_search+0xd9/0xf9 [btrfs]
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06b3708>] tree_search+0x42/0x63 [btrfs]
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06b4868>] ? btrfs_lookup_ordered_range+0x2d/0xa5 [btrfs]
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06b4873>] btrfs_lookup_ordered_range+0x38/0xa5 [btrfs]
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06aab8e>] btrfs_get_blocks_direct+0x11b/0x615 [btrfs]
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffff8119727f>] do_blockdev_direct_IO+0x5ff/0xb43
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06aaa73>] ? btrfs_page_exists_in_range+0x1ad/0x1ad [btrfs]
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06a2c9a>] ? btrfs_get_extent_fiemap+0x1bc/0x1bc [btrfs]
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffff811977f5>] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x32/0x34
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06a2c9a>] ? btrfs_get_extent_fiemap+0x1bc/0x1bc [btrfs]
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06a10ae>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x198/0x21f [btrfs]
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06a2c9a>] ? btrfs_get_extent_fiemap+0x1bc/0x1bc [btrfs]
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffff81112ca1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06affaa>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x15f/0x3e0 [btrfs]
[161779.860636]  [<ffffffffa06b004c>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x201/0x3e0 [btrfs]
(...)

We were also not freeing the btrfs_dio_private we allocated previously,
which kmemleak reported with the following trace in its sysfs file:

unreferenced object 0xffff8803f553bf80 (size 96):
  comm "xfs_io", pid 4501, jiffies 4295039588 (age 173.936s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    88 6c 9b f5 02 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  .l..............
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c4 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<ffffffff81161ffe>] create_object+0x172/0x29a
    [<ffffffff8145870f>] kmemleak_alloc+0x25/0x41
    [<ffffffff81154e64>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive.constprop.40+0x16/0x18
    [<ffffffff811579ed>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xfb/0x148
    [<ffffffffa03d8cff>] btrfs_submit_direct+0x65/0x16a [btrfs]
    [<ffffffff811968dc>] dio_bio_submit+0x62/0x8f
    [<ffffffff811975fe>] do_blockdev_direct_IO+0x97e/0xb43
    [<ffffffff811977f5>] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x32/0x34
    [<ffffffffa03d70ae>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x198/0x21f [btrfs]
    [<ffffffff81112ca1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
    [<ffffffffa03e604d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x201/0x3e0 [btrfs]
    [<ffffffff8116586a>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
    [<ffffffff81165da9>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
    [<ffffffff81166675>] SyS_pwrite64+0x64/0x82
    [<ffffffff81464fd7>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
    [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

For read requests we weren't doing any cleanup either (none of the work
done by btrfs_endio_direct_read()), so a failure submitting a bio for a
read request would leave a range in the inode's io_tree locked forever,
blocking any future operations (both reads and writes) against that range.

So fix this by making sure we do the same cleanup that we do for the case
where the bio submission succeeds.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>