and I don't see anything that would've prevented tee(2) called on the pipe
that got stuff spliced into it from that sucker. ->ops->get() will be
called, then buf gets copied into target pipe's ->bufs[] and eventually
readers get to both copies of the buffer. With
get_page(page)
look at that page
__free_page(page)
look at that page
__free_page(page)
which is not a good thing, to put it mildly. AFAICS, that ought to use
the normal generic_pipe_buf_release() (aka page_cache_release(buf->page)),
shouldn't it?
[
SDR - As trace_pipe just allocates the page with alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL),
and doesn't do anything special with it (no LRU logic). The __free_page()
should be fine, as it wont actually free a page with reference count.
Maybe there's a chance to leak memory? Anyway, This change is at a minimum
good for being symmetric with generic_pipe_buf_get, it is fine to add.
]
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
[ SDR - Removed no longer used tracing_pipe_buf_release ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>