sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq avg tracking underflow

sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq avg tracking underflow

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607404
commit 8974189222159154c55f24ddad33e3613960521a upstream.

As per commit:

  b7fa30c9cc48 ("sched/fair: Fix post_init_entity_util_avg() serialization")

> the code generated from update_cfs_rq_load_avg():
>
> 	if (atomic_long_read(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg)) {
> 		s64 r = atomic_long_xchg(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg, 0);
> 		sa->load_avg = max_t(long, sa->load_avg - r, 0);
> 		sa->load_sum = max_t(s64, sa->load_sum - r * LOAD_AVG_MAX, 0);
> 		removed_load = 1;
> 	}
>
> turns into:
>
> ffffffff81087064:       49 8b 85 98 00 00 00    mov    0x98(%r13),%rax
> ffffffff8108706b:       48 85 c0                test   %rax,%rax
> ffffffff8108706e:       74 40                   je     ffffffff810870b0 <update_blocked_averages+0xc0>
> ffffffff81087070:       4c 89 f8                mov    %r15,%rax
> ffffffff81087073:       49 87 85 98 00 00 00    xchg   %rax,0x98(%r13)
> ffffffff8108707a:       49 29 45 70             sub    %rax,0x70(%r13)
> ffffffff8108707e:       4c 89 f9                mov    %r15,%rcx
> ffffffff81087081:       bb 01 00 00 00          mov    $0x1,%ebx
> ffffffff81087086:       49 83 7d 70 00          cmpq   $0x0,0x70(%r13)
> ffffffff8108708b:       49 0f 49 4d 70          cmovns 0x70(%r13),%rcx
>
> Which you'll note ends up with sa->load_avg -= r in memory at
> ffffffff8108707a.

So I _should_ have looked at other unserialized users of ->load_avg,
but alas. Luckily nikbor reported a similar /0 from task_h_load() which
instantly triggered recollection of this here problem.

Aside from the intermediate value hitting memory and causing problems,
there's another problem: the underflow detection relies on the signed
bit. This reduces the effective width of the variables, IOW its
effectively the same as having these variables be of signed type.

This patch changes to a different means of unsigned underflow
detection to not rely on the signed bit. This allows the variables to
use the 'full' unsigned range. And it does so with explicit LOAD -
STORE to ensure any intermediate value will never be visible in
memory, allowing these unserialized loads.

Note: GCC generates crap code for this, might warrant a look later.

Note2: I say 'full' above, if we end up at U*_MAX we'll still explode;
       maybe we should do clamping on add too.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: kernel@kyup.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: steve.muckle@linaro.org
Fixes: 9d89c257dfb9 ("sched/fair: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160617091948.GJ30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>