ASoC: SOF: Intel: power optimizations with HDaudio SPIB register
Merge series from Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>:
The use of the SPIB register helps reduce power consumption - though
to a smaller degree than DMI_L1. This hardware capability is however
incompatible with userspace-initiated rewinds typically used by
PulseAudio.
In the past (2015..2017) Intel suggested an API extension to let
applications disable rewinds. At the time the feedback was that such a
capability was too Intel-specific and SPIB remained unused except for
loading DSP code. We now see devices with smaller batteries being
released, and it's time to revisit Linux support for SPIB to extend
battery life.
In this update the rewinds are disabled via an opt-in kernel
parameter. In the previous reviews, there was consensus that a Kconfig
option was too complicated for distributions to set, and we are
missing a TBD API to expose such capabilities to user-space.
The debate on whether or not to use rewinds, and the impact of
disabling rewinds, will likely be closed when Intel releases the
'deep-buffer' support, currently under development [2][3]. With this
solution, rewinds will not be needed, ever. When an application deals
with content that is not latency-sensitive (e.g. music playback), it
will be able to reduce power consumption by selecting a different PCM
device with increased buffering capabilities. Low-latency streams
will be handled by the 'regular' path. In other words, the impossible
compromise between power and latency will be handled with different
PCM devices/profiles for the same endpoint, and we can push the design
of capability negotiation to a later time when all the building blocks
(firmware topology, kernel, userspace) are ready - we still have
firmware xruns, DPCM race conditions to solve, and a need to describe
these alternate PCM devices with UCM using 'modifiers'.