Not because execve races with _that_ are serious - we really
need a situation when final drop of fs_struct refcount is
done by something that used to have it as current->fs.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
{
struct task_struct *g, *p;
struct fs_struct *fs;
{
struct task_struct *g, *p;
struct fs_struct *fs;
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
do_each_thread(g, p) {
task_lock(p);
fs = p->fs;
if (fs) {
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
do_each_thread(g, p) {
task_lock(p);
fs = p->fs;
if (fs) {
- atomic_inc(&fs->count);
- task_unlock(p);
if (fs->root.dentry == old_root->dentry
if (fs->root.dentry == old_root->dentry
- && fs->root.mnt == old_root->mnt)
- set_fs_root(fs, new_root);
+ && fs->root.mnt == old_root->mnt) {
+ path_get(new_root);
+ fs->root = *new_root;
+ count++;
+ }
if (fs->pwd.dentry == old_root->dentry
if (fs->pwd.dentry == old_root->dentry
- && fs->pwd.mnt == old_root->mnt)
- set_fs_pwd(fs, new_root);
- put_fs_struct(fs);
- } else
- task_unlock(p);
+ && fs->pwd.mnt == old_root->mnt) {
+ path_get(new_root);
+ fs->pwd = *new_root;
+ count++;
+ }
+ write_unlock(&fs->lock);
+ }
+ task_unlock(p);
} while_each_thread(g, p);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
} while_each_thread(g, p);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ while (count--)
+ path_put(old_root);