Evaluation of revision D of WM5110 suggests updates to the register
patch for optimal performance. For the sake of clarity rev C of the chip
does not require a register patch.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
{ 0x80, 0x0 },
};
+static const struct reg_default wm5110_revd_patch[] = {
+ { 0x80, 0x3 },
+ { 0x80, 0x3 },
+ { 0x393, 0x27 },
+ { 0x394, 0x27 },
+ { 0x395, 0x27 },
+ { 0x396, 0x27 },
+ { 0x397, 0x27 },
+ { 0x398, 0x26 },
+ { 0x221, 0x90 },
+ { 0x211, 0x8 },
+ { 0x36c, 0x1fb },
+ { 0x26e, 0x64 },
+ { 0x26f, 0xea },
+ { 0x270, 0x1f16 },
+ { 0x51b, 0x1 },
+ { 0x55b, 0x1 },
+ { 0x59b, 0x1 },
+ { 0x4f0, 0x633 },
+ { 0x441, 0xc059 },
+ { 0x209, 0x27 },
+ { 0x80, 0x0 },
+ { 0x80, 0x0 },
+};
+
/* We use a function so we can use ARRAY_SIZE() */
int wm5110_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
{
return regmap_register_patch(arizona->regmap,
wm5110_revb_patch,
ARRAY_SIZE(wm5110_revb_patch));
-
+ case 3:
+ return regmap_register_patch(arizona->regmap,
+ wm5110_revd_patch,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(wm5110_revd_patch));
default:
return 0;
}