Interrupts are enabled at the point where the DAVINCI_I2C_IVR_REG is read,
so unless an interrupt happened just at that moment, no interrupt would be
pending. Even though documentation implies you should do this, I see no
reason. If slave support is added, this read would cause a hard to
reproduce bug.
Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
struct davinci_i2c_dev *dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
struct davinci_i2c_platform_data *pdata = dev->dev->platform_data;
u32 flag;
- u32 stat;
u16 w;
int r;
init_completion(&dev->cmd_complete);
dev->cmd_err = 0;
- /* Clear any pending interrupts by reading the IVR */
- stat = davinci_i2c_read_reg(dev, DAVINCI_I2C_IVR_REG);
-
/* Take I2C out of reset, configure it as master and set the
* start bit */
flag = DAVINCI_I2C_MDR_IRS | DAVINCI_I2C_MDR_MST | DAVINCI_I2C_MDR_STT;