]> git.proxmox.com Git - mirror_ubuntu-hirsute-kernel.git/commitdiff
x86/mm/tlb: Make lazy TLB mode lazier
authorRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 03:58:44 +0000 (23:58 -0400)
committerPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Tue, 9 Oct 2018 14:51:12 +0000 (16:51 +0200)
Lazy TLB mode can result in an idle CPU being woken up by a TLB flush,
when all it really needs to do is reload %CR3 at the next context switch,
assuming no page table pages got freed.

Memory ordering is used to prevent race conditions between switch_mm_irqs_off,
which checks whether .tlb_gen changed, and the TLB invalidation code, which
increments .tlb_gen whenever page table entries get invalidated.

The atomic increment in inc_mm_tlb_gen is its own barrier; the context
switch code adds an explicit barrier between reading tlbstate.is_lazy and
next->context.tlb_gen.

CPUs in lazy TLB mode remain part of the mm_cpumask(mm), both because
that allows TLB flush IPIs to be sent at page table freeing time, and
because the cache line bouncing on the mm_cpumask(mm) was responsible
for about half the CPU use in switch_mm_irqs_off().

We can change native_flush_tlb_others() without touching other
(paravirt) implementations of flush_tlb_others() because we'll be
flushing less. The existing implementations flush more and are
therefore still correct.

Cc: npiggin@gmail.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: luto@kernel.org
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Tested-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180926035844.1420-8-riel@surriel.com
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c

index 92e46f4c058c64a0bf68f52212a70e5401752acf..7d68489cfdb15ff0838aba5beb6207c36b27cd77 100644 (file)
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
 {
        struct mm_struct *real_prev = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm);
        u16 prev_asid = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm_asid);
+       bool was_lazy = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy);
        unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id();
        u64 next_tlb_gen;
        bool need_flush;
@@ -242,17 +243,40 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
                           next->context.ctx_id);
 
                /*
-                * We don't currently support having a real mm loaded without
-                * our cpu set in mm_cpumask().  We have all the bookkeeping
-                * in place to figure out whether we would need to flush
-                * if our cpu were cleared in mm_cpumask(), but we don't
-                * currently use it.
+                * Even in lazy TLB mode, the CPU should stay set in the
+                * mm_cpumask. The TLB shootdown code can figure out from
+                * from cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy whether or not to send an IPI.
                 */
                if (WARN_ON_ONCE(real_prev != &init_mm &&
                                 !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next))))
                        cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
 
-               return;
+               /*
+                * If the CPU is not in lazy TLB mode, we are just switching
+                * from one thread in a process to another thread in the same
+                * process. No TLB flush required.
+                */
+               if (!was_lazy)
+                       return;
+
+               /*
+                * Read the tlb_gen to check whether a flush is needed.
+                * If the TLB is up to date, just use it.
+                * The barrier synchronizes with the tlb_gen increment in
+                * the TLB shootdown code.
+                */
+               smp_mb();
+               next_tlb_gen = atomic64_read(&next->context.tlb_gen);
+               if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[prev_asid].tlb_gen) ==
+                               next_tlb_gen)
+                       return;
+
+               /*
+                * TLB contents went out of date while we were in lazy
+                * mode. Fall through to the TLB switching code below.
+                */
+               new_asid = prev_asid;
+               need_flush = true;
        } else {
                u64 last_ctx_id = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.last_ctx_id);
 
@@ -346,8 +370,10 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
        this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm, next);
        this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm_asid, new_asid);
 
-       load_mm_cr4(next);
-       switch_ldt(real_prev, next);
+       if (next != real_prev) {
+               load_mm_cr4(next);
+               switch_ldt(real_prev, next);
+       }
 }
 
 /*
@@ -455,6 +481,9 @@ static void flush_tlb_func_common(const struct flush_tlb_info *f,
                 * paging-structure cache to avoid speculatively reading
                 * garbage into our TLB.  Since switching to init_mm is barely
                 * slower than a minimal flush, just switch to init_mm.
+                *
+                * This should be rare, with native_flush_tlb_others skipping
+                * IPIs to lazy TLB mode CPUs.
                 */
                switch_mm_irqs_off(NULL, &init_mm, NULL);
                return;
@@ -557,6 +586,11 @@ static void flush_tlb_func_remote(void *info)
        flush_tlb_func_common(f, false, TLB_REMOTE_SHOOTDOWN);
 }
 
+static bool tlb_is_not_lazy(int cpu, void *data)
+{
+       return !per_cpu(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy, cpu);
+}
+
 void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
                             const struct flush_tlb_info *info)
 {
@@ -592,8 +626,23 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
                                               (void *)info, 1);
                return;
        }
-       smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
+
+       /*
+        * If no page tables were freed, we can skip sending IPIs to
+        * CPUs in lazy TLB mode. They will flush the CPU themselves
+        * at the next context switch.
+        *
+        * However, if page tables are getting freed, we need to send the
+        * IPI everywhere, to prevent CPUs in lazy TLB mode from tripping
+        * up on the new contents of what used to be page tables, while
+        * doing a speculative memory access.
+        */
+       if (info->freed_tables)
+               smp_call_function_many(cpumask, flush_tlb_func_remote,
                               (void *)info, 1);
+       else
+               on_each_cpu_cond_mask(tlb_is_not_lazy, flush_tlb_func_remote,
+                               (void *)info, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, cpumask);
 }
 
 /*