Looks like I incorrectly merged one of the rtnl lock changes,
so that one function, bonding_show_active_slave, held rtnl but didn't
release it, and another, bonding_store_active_slave, never held rtnl but
did release it.
Fixed so the first function doesn't mess with rtnl, and the
second correctly acquires and releases rtnl.
Bug reported by Moni Shoua <monis@voltaire.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
struct bonding *bond = to_bond(d);
int count;
- rtnl_lock();
-
read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
curr = bond->curr_active_slave;
read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
struct slave *new_active = NULL;
struct bonding *bond = to_bond(d);
+ rtnl_lock();
write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
+
if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) {
printk(KERN_INFO DRV_NAME
": %s: Unable to change active slave; %s is in mode %d\n",