I'm working on hardware that currently has a limited number of
scratchpad registers and ntb_ndev fails with no clue as to why. I
feel it is better to fail early and provide a reasonable error message
then to fail later on.
The same is done to ntb_perf, but it doesn't currently require enough
spads to actually fail. I've also removed the unused SPAD_MSG and
SPAD_ACK enums so that MAX_SPAD accurately reflects the number of
spads used.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Acked-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
int node;
int rc, i;
+ mw_count = ntb_mw_count(ndev);
+ if (ntb_spad_count(ndev) < (NUM_MWS + 1 + mw_count * 2)) {
+ dev_err(&ndev->dev, "Not enough scratch pad registers for %s",
+ NTB_TRANSPORT_NAME);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
if (ntb_db_is_unsafe(ndev))
dev_dbg(&ndev->dev,
"doorbell is unsafe, proceed anyway...\n");
nt->ndev = ndev;
- mw_count = ntb_mw_count(ndev);
-
nt->mw_count = mw_count;
nt->mw_vec = kzalloc_node(mw_count * sizeof(*nt->mw_vec),
VERSION = 0,
MW_SZ_HIGH,
MW_SZ_LOW,
- SPAD_MSG,
- SPAD_ACK,
MAX_SPAD
};
int node;
int rc = 0;
+ if (ntb_spad_count(ntb) < MAX_SPAD) {
+ dev_err(&ntb->dev, "Not enough scratch pad registers for %s",
+ DRIVER_NAME);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
node = dev_to_node(&pdev->dev);
perf = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*perf), GFP_KERNEL, node);