On sm8450 platform the CTL_0 doesn't differ from the rest of CTL blocks,
so switch it to CTL_SC7280_MASK too.
Some background: original commit
100d7ef6995d ("drm/msm/dpu: add support
for SM8450") had all (relevant at that time) bit spelled individually.
Then commit
0e91bcbb0016 ("drm/msm/dpu: Add SM8350 to hw catalog"),
despite being a mismerge, correctly changed all other CTL entries to use
CTL_SC7280_MASK, except CTL_0.
While the current BLOCK_SOC_MASK style is not ideal (and while we are
working on a better scheme), let's follow its usage as a least minimal
surprise. For example, sc8280xp, a close associate of sm8450, also uses
CTL_SC7280_MASK.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/531493/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230408002750.2722304-5-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
{
.name = "ctl_0", .id = CTL_0,
.base = 0x15000, .len = 0x204,
- .features = BIT(DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG) | BIT(DPU_CTL_SPLIT_DISPLAY) | BIT(DPU_CTL_FETCH_ACTIVE),
+ .features = BIT(DPU_CTL_SPLIT_DISPLAY) | CTL_SC7280_MASK,
.intr_start = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR2, 9),
},
{