Our CI test system is configuring interfaces like this:
int A
<ospfX config>
router ospfX
router-id Z.Y.M.Q
On sufficiently loaded systems, the router-id might not be respected because
the interface A neighbor might have come up by the time the router-id
command is read in. This is a problem for our topotests in that
the tests expect neighbors to be formed with certain router-id,
but the FRR code has stored the new router-id but not accepted
it's use since a neighbor relationship has formed.
Modify the ci test system code to put the 'router ospfX' commands
before the interface commands, thus forcing the router-id to be
read in *before* any possibility that the neighbor can have come
up.
Also, I've filed issue #13452 to address the ordering of commands
with regards to router-id in our ospf protocols. Once that is
done this should be backed out, to return to a more natural ordering
of commands.