IB/uverbs: Check comp_mask in destroy_flow

Just like the check added to create_flow in 22878dbc9173 ("IB/core:
Better checking of userspace values for receive flow steering"),
comp_mask must be checked in destroy_flow too.

Since only empty comp_mask is currently supported, any other value
must be rejected.

This check was silently added in a previous patch[1] to move comp_mask
in extended command header, part of previous patchset[2] against
create/destroy_flow uverbs. The idea of moving comp_mask to the header
was discarded for the final patchset[3].

Unfortunately the check added in destroy_flow uverb was not integrated
in the final patchset.

[1] http://marc.info/?i=40175eda10d670d098204da6aa4c327a0171ae5f.1381510045.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com
[2] http://marc.info/?i=cover.1381510045.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com
[3] http://marc.info/?i=cover.1383773832.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com

Cc: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>
Link: http://marc.info/?i=cover.1386798254.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Signed-off-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
index 65f6e7dc380c382cc0335e495fb2f583a4eef7b7..f0ee6b92132a228095323c5784f7154964f26e35 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
@@ -2795,6 +2795,9 @@ int ib_uverbs_ex_destroy_flow(struct ib_uverbs_file *file,
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
+       if (cmd.comp_mask)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
        uobj = idr_write_uobj(&ib_uverbs_rule_idr, cmd.flow_handle,
                              file->ucontext);
        if (!uobj)