It doesn't make sense for a region to be INT64_MAX in size:
memory core uses UINT64_MAX as a special value meaning
"all 64 bit" this is what was meant here.
While this should never affect the PC system which at the moment always
has < 63 bit size, this makes us hit all kind of corner case bugs with
sub-pages, so users are probably better off if we just use UINT64_MAX
instead.
Reported-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
if (pci_enabled) {
pci_memory = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
- memory_region_init(pci_memory, NULL, "pci", INT64_MAX);
+ memory_region_init(pci_memory, NULL, "pci", UINT64_MAX);
rom_memory = pci_memory;
} else {
pci_memory = NULL;
/* pci enabled */
if (pci_enabled) {
pci_memory = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
- memory_region_init(pci_memory, NULL, "pci", INT64_MAX);
+ memory_region_init(pci_memory, NULL, "pci", UINT64_MAX);
rom_memory = pci_memory;
} else {
pci_memory = NULL;