[SCSI] zfcp: Fix check whether unchained ct_els is possible

A false check was performed whether an unchained ct_els
is possible or not.

Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>

diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
index 9ac6a6e4a6047531d142b86256c8266e5c411dfc..4e15361a83b98e98cf8fb27411fb9e697a7048c2 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static int zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_sbals(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req,
        }
 
        /* use single, unchained SBAL if it can hold the request */
-       if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) || zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) {
+       if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) && zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) {
                zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_unchained(adapter->qdio, &req->qdio_req,
                                                sg_req, sg_resp);
                return 0;