When afs_rename() calculates the expected data version of the target
directory in a cross-directory rename, it doesn't increment it as it
should, so it always thinks that the target inode is unexpectedly modified
on the server.
Fixes: a58823ac4589 ("afs: Fix application of status and callback to be under same lock")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
afs_end_vnode_operation(&fc);
goto error_rehash;
}
- new_data_version = new_dvnode->status.data_version;
+ new_data_version = new_dvnode->status.data_version + 1;
} else {
new_data_version = orig_data_version;
new_scb = &scb[0];