bitmap_zero() is called after bitmap_alloc() in perf code. But
bitmap_alloc() internally uses calloc() which guarantees that allocated
area is zeroed. So following bitmap_zero is unneeded. Drop it.
This happened because of confusing name for bitmap allocator. It
should has name bitmap_zalloc instead of bitmap_alloc.
This series:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/18/841
introduces a new API for bitmap allocations in kernel, and functions
there are named correctly. Following patch propogates the API to tools,
and fixes naming issue.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andriy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180623073502.16321-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
bm = bitmap_alloc(nbits);
if (map && bm) {
- bitmap_zero(bm, nbits);
-
for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++)
set_bit(map->map[i], bm);
}
bm = bitmap_alloc(nbits);
if (map && bm) {
- bitmap_zero(bm, nbits);
-
for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
set_bit(map->map[i], bm);
}
if (!set)
return -ENOMEM;
- bitmap_zero(set, size);
-
p = (u64 *) set;
for (i = 0; (u64) i < BITS_TO_U64(size); i++) {
return -ENOMEM;
}
- bitmap_zero(n->set, size);
n->node = idx;
n->size = size;