drm/doc: Allow new UAPI to be used once it's in drm-next/drm-misc-next.

I was trying to figure out if it was permissible to merge the Mesa
side of V3D's CSD support yet while it's in drm-misc-next but not
drm-next, and developers on #dri-devel IRC had differing opinions of
what the requirement was.

v2: Restrict to just drm-next or drm-misc-next on airlied's request.

Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190424220638.16222-1-eric@anholt.net
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
index c9fd23efd957370142f4f785f15c80e54fbc2995..b7a96dc02d21b769c2f9c2f9eb5bb39bd7c4b97a 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
@@ -92,9 +92,9 @@ leads to a few additional requirements:
   requirements by doing a quick fork.
 
 - The kernel patch can only be merged after all the above requirements are met,
-  but it **must** be merged **before** the userspace patches land. uAPI always flows
-  from the kernel, doing things the other way round risks divergence of the uAPI
-  definitions and header files.
+  but it **must** be merged to either drm-next or drm-misc-next **before** the
+  userspace patches land. uAPI always flows from the kernel, doing things the
+  other way round risks divergence of the uAPI definitions and header files.
 
 These are fairly steep requirements, but have grown out from years of shared
 pain and experience with uAPI added hastily, and almost always regretted about