The transition from markov state "3 => lost packets within a burst
period" to "1 => successfully transmitted packets within a gap period"
has no *additional* loss event. The loss already happen for transition
from 1 -> 3, this additional loss will make things go wild.
E.g. transition probabilities:
p13: 10%
p31: 100%
Expected:
Ploss = p13 / (p13 + p31)
Ploss = ~9.09%
... but it isn't. Even worse: we get a double loss - each time.
So simple don't return true to indicate loss, rather break and return
false.
Signed-off-by: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it>
Cc: Fabio Ludovici <fabio.ludovici@yahoo.it>
Signed-off-by: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
clg->state = 2;
else if (clg->a3 < rnd && rnd < clg->a2 + clg->a3) {
clg->state = 1;
- return true;
} else if (clg->a2 + clg->a3 < rnd) {
clg->state = 3;
return true;