There's no point in poisoning the ->IO_ADDR_{R,W}, a NULL pointer
is just as good to detect unexpected ->IO_ADDR_{R,W} usage.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
mtd->owner = THIS_MODULE;
mtd->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
- chip->IO_ADDR_R = (void __iomem *)0xdeadbeef;
- chip->IO_ADDR_W = (void __iomem *)0xdeadbeef;
-
chip->cmd_ctrl = brcmnand_cmd_ctrl;
chip->cmdfunc = brcmnand_cmdfunc;
chip->waitfunc = brcmnand_waitfunc;
mtd->name = "socrates_nand";
mtd->dev.parent = &ofdev->dev;
- /*should never be accessed directly */
- nand_chip->IO_ADDR_R = (void *)0xdeadbeef;
- nand_chip->IO_ADDR_W = (void *)0xdeadbeef;
-
nand_chip->cmd_ctrl = socrates_nand_cmd_ctrl;
nand_chip->read_byte = socrates_nand_read_byte;
nand_chip->write_buf = socrates_nand_write_buf;