If the user doesn't override the default values of the GuC-related
kernel parameters, then on a non-GuC-based platform we shouldn't
mention that we haven't loaded the GuC firmware.
The various messages have been reordered into a least->most severe
cascade (none/INFO/INFO/ERROR) for ease of comprehension.
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1465575685-34169-1-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com
ret = 0;
}
- if (err == 0)
+ if (err == 0 && !HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev))
+ ; /* Don't mention the GuC! */
+ else if (err == 0)
DRM_INFO("GuC firmware load skipped\n");
- else if (ret == -EIO)
- DRM_ERROR("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
- else
+ else if (ret != -EIO)
DRM_INFO("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
+ else
+ DRM_ERROR("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
if (i915.enable_guc_submission) {
if (fw_path == NULL)