]> git.proxmox.com Git - mirror_frr.git/commitdiff
tests: Applied black formatting
authorKuldeep Kashyap <kashyapk@vmware.com>
Tue, 11 Oct 2022 06:47:54 +0000 (12:17 +0530)
committerKuldeep Kashyap <kashyapk@vmware.com>
Tue, 11 Oct 2022 06:47:54 +0000 (12:17 +0530)
Applied black formatting to suites,
which were missing.

Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Kashyap <kashyapk@vmware.com>
tests/topotests/bgp_gr_functionality_topo3/bgp_gr_functionality_topo3.py
tests/topotests/bgp_prefix_list_topo1/test_prefix_lists.py
tests/topotests/bgp_route_map/test_route_map_topo1.py
tests/topotests/bgp_route_map/test_route_map_topo2.py

index 18ce3d9c72902fe29e73d624bbdcc27633784a7c..76522206a419d5bf761821452548bbbffb962d0e 100644 (file)
@@ -56,15 +56,20 @@ from lib.bgp import (
     verify_graceful_restart_timers,
     verify_bgp_convergence_from_running_config,
 )
+
 # Import common_config to use commomnly used APIs
-from lib.common_config import (create_common_configuration,
-                               InvalidCLIError, retry,
-                               generate_ips, FRRCFG_FILE,
-                               find_interface_with_greater_ip,
-                               check_address_types,
-                               validate_ip_address,
-                               run_frr_cmd,
-                               get_frr_ipv6_linklocal)
+from lib.common_config import (
+    create_common_configuration,
+    InvalidCLIError,
+    retry,
+    generate_ips,
+    FRRCFG_FILE,
+    find_interface_with_greater_ip,
+    check_address_types,
+    validate_ip_address,
+    run_frr_cmd,
+    get_frr_ipv6_linklocal,
+)
 
 from lib.common_config import (
     write_test_header,
@@ -108,8 +113,7 @@ NEXT_HOP_IP = {"ipv4": "Null0", "ipv6": "Null0"}
 PREFERRED_NEXT_HOP = "link_local"
 
 
-def configure_gr_followed_by_clear(tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name,
-                                   dut, peer):
+def configure_gr_followed_by_clear(tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name, dut, peer):
     """
     result = configure_gr_followed_by_clear(tgen, topo, dut)
     assert result is True, \
@@ -118,8 +122,7 @@ def configure_gr_followed_by_clear(tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name,
     """
 
     result = create_router_bgp(tgen, topo, input_dict)
-    assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
-        tc_name, result)
+    assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
     for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
         clear_bgp(tgen, addr_type, dut)
 
@@ -131,6 +134,7 @@ def configure_gr_followed_by_clear(tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name,
 
     return True
 
+
 def verify_stale_routes_list(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict):
     """
     This API is use verify Stale routes on refering the network with next hop value
@@ -175,8 +179,8 @@ def verify_stale_routes_list(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict):
             command = "show bgp"
             # Static routes
             sleep(2)
-            logger.info('Checking router {} BGP RIB:'.format(dut))
-            if 'static_routes' in input_dict[routerInput]:
+            logger.info("Checking router {} BGP RIB:".format(dut))
+            if "static_routes" in input_dict[routerInput]:
                 static_routes = input_dict[routerInput]["static_routes"]
                 for static_route in static_routes:
                     found_routes = []
@@ -185,30 +189,27 @@ def verify_stale_routes_list(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict):
                     nh_found = False
                     vrf = static_route.setdefault("vrf", None)
                     community = static_route.setdefault("community", None)
-                    largeCommunity = \
-                        static_route.setdefault("largeCommunity", None)
+                    largeCommunity = static_route.setdefault("largeCommunity", None)
                     if vrf:
-                        cmd = "{} vrf {} {}".\
-                            format(command, vrf, addr_type)
+                        cmd = "{} vrf {} {}".format(command, vrf, addr_type)
                         if community:
-                            cmd = "{} community {}".\
-                                format(cmd, community)
+                            cmd = "{} community {}".format(cmd, community)
                         if largeCommunity:
-                            cmd = "{} large-community {}".\
-                                format(cmd, largeCommunity)
+                            cmd = "{} large-community {}".format(cmd, largeCommunity)
                     else:
-                        cmd = "{} {}".\
-                            format(command, addr_type)
+                        cmd = "{} {}".format(command, addr_type)
                     cmd = "{} json".format(cmd)
                     rib_routes_json = run_frr_cmd(rnode, cmd, isjson=True)
                     # Verifying output dictionary rib_routes_json is not empty
                     if bool(rib_routes_json) == False:
-                        errormsg = "[DUT: {}]: No route found in rib of router". \
-                            format(router)
+                        errormsg = "[DUT: {}]: No route found in rib of router".format(
+                            router
+                        )
                         return errormsg
                     elif "warning" in rib_routes_json:
-                        errormsg = "[DUT: {}]: {}". \
-                            format(router, rib_routes_json["warning"])
+                        errormsg = "[DUT: {}]: {}".format(
+                            router, rib_routes_json["warning"]
+                        )
                         return errormsg
                     network = static_route["network"]
                     if "no_of_ip" in static_route:
@@ -227,15 +228,18 @@ def verify_stale_routes_list(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict):
                             st_found = True
 
                             found_routes.append(st_rt)
-                            for mnh in range(0, len(rib_routes_json[
-                                'routes'][st_rt])):
-                                found_hops.append([rib_r[
-                                        "ip"] for rib_r in rib_routes_json[
-                                            'routes'][st_rt][
-                                                mnh]["nexthops"]])
+                            for mnh in range(0, len(rib_routes_json["routes"][st_rt])):
+                                found_hops.append(
+                                    [
+                                        rib_r["ip"]
+                                        for rib_r in rib_routes_json["routes"][st_rt][
+                                            mnh
+                                        ]["nexthops"]
+                                    ]
+                                )
                             return found_hops
                         else:
-                            return 'error  msg - no hops found'
+                            return "error  msg - no hops found"
 
 
 def setup_module(mod):
@@ -302,6 +306,8 @@ def teardown_module(mod):
         "Testsuite end time: {}".format(time.asctime(time.localtime(time.time())))
     )
     logger.info("=" * 40)
+
+
 ################################################################################
 #
 #                       TEST CASES
@@ -318,175 +324,160 @@ def test_bgp_gr_stale_routes(request):
 
     step("Creating 5 static Routes in Router R3 with NULL0 as Next hop")
     for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
-            input_dict_1 = {
-                "r3": {
-                    "static_routes": [{
-                    "network": [NETWORK1_1[addr_type]] + [NETWORK1_2[addr_type]],
-                    "next_hop": NEXT_HOP_IP[addr_type]
-                },
-                {
-                    "network": [NETWORK2_1[addr_type]] + [NETWORK2_2[addr_type]],
-                    "next_hop": NEXT_HOP_IP[addr_type]
-                },
-                {
-                    "network": [NETWORK3_1[addr_type]] + [NETWORK3_2[addr_type]],
-                    "next_hop": NEXT_HOP_IP[addr_type]
-                },
-                {
-                    "network": [NETWORK4_1[addr_type]] + [NETWORK4_2[addr_type]],
-                    "next_hop": NEXT_HOP_IP[addr_type]
-                },
-                {
-                    "network": [NETWORK5_1[addr_type]] + [NETWORK5_2[addr_type]],
-                    "next_hop": NEXT_HOP_IP[addr_type]
-                }]
-            }
+        input_dict_1 = {
+            "r3": {
+                "static_routes": [
+                    {
+                        "network": [NETWORK1_1[addr_type]] + [NETWORK1_2[addr_type]],
+                        "next_hop": NEXT_HOP_IP[addr_type],
+                    },
+                    {
+                        "network": [NETWORK2_1[addr_type]] + [NETWORK2_2[addr_type]],
+                        "next_hop": NEXT_HOP_IP[addr_type],
+                    },
+                    {
+                        "network": [NETWORK3_1[addr_type]] + [NETWORK3_2[addr_type]],
+                        "next_hop": NEXT_HOP_IP[addr_type],
+                    },
+                    {
+                        "network": [NETWORK4_1[addr_type]] + [NETWORK4_2[addr_type]],
+                        "next_hop": NEXT_HOP_IP[addr_type],
+                    },
+                    {
+                        "network": [NETWORK5_1[addr_type]] + [NETWORK5_2[addr_type]],
+                        "next_hop": NEXT_HOP_IP[addr_type],
+                    },
+                ]
             }
-            result = create_static_routes(tgen, input_dict_1)
-            assert result is True, 'Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}'.format(
-            tc_name, result)
+        }
+        result = create_static_routes(tgen, input_dict_1)
+        assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+            tc_name, result
+        )
     step("verifying Created  Route  at R3 in VRF default")
     for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
-        dut = 'r3'
-        input_dict_1= {'r3': topo['routers']['r3']}
+        dut = "r3"
+        input_dict_1 = {"r3": topo["routers"]["r3"]}
         result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1)
-        assert result is True, \
-            "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}". \
-                format(tc_name, result)
-    #done
+        assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
+    # done
     step("verifying Created  Route  at R2 in VRF default")
     for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
-        dut = 'r2'
-        input_dict_1= {'r2': topo['routers']['r2']}
+        dut = "r2"
+        input_dict_1 = {"r2": topo["routers"]["r2"]}
         result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1)
-        assert result is True, \
-            "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}". \
-                format(tc_name, result)
+        assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
     step("importing vrf RED on R2 under Address Family")
     for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
-        input_import_vrf={
+        input_import_vrf = {
             "r2": {
                 "bgp": [
                     {
                         "local_as": 200,
                         "vrf": "RED",
-                        "address_family": {addr_type: {"unicast": {"import": {"vrf": "default"}}}},
+                        "address_family": {
+                            addr_type: {"unicast": {"import": {"vrf": "default"}}}
+                        },
                     }
                 ]
             }
         }
-        result = create_router_bgp(tgen, topo,input_import_vrf)
-        assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(tc_name, result)
-    #done
+        result = create_router_bgp(tgen, topo, input_import_vrf)
+        assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+            tc_name, result
+        )
+    # done
     step("verifying static  Routes  at R2 in VRF RED")
     for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
-        dut = 'r2'
-        input_dict_1= {'r2': topo['routers']['r2']}
+        dut = "r2"
+        input_dict_1 = {"r2": topo["routers"]["r2"]}
         result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1)
-        assert result is True, \
-            "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}". \
-                format(tc_name, result)
+        assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
 
     step("verifying static  Routes  at R1 in VRF RED")
     for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
-        dut = 'r1'
-        input_dict_1= {'r1': topo['routers']['r1']}
+        dut = "r1"
+        input_dict_1 = {"r1": topo["routers"]["r1"]}
         result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1)
-        assert result is True, \
-            "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}". \
-                format(tc_name, result)
+        assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
 
     step("Configuring Graceful restart at R2 and R3 ")
     input_dict = {
         "r2": {
-
             "bgp": {
                 "local_as": "200",
                 "graceful-restart": {
                     "graceful-restart": True,
-                }
+                },
             }
         },
         "r3": {
-            "bgp": {
-                "local_as": "300",
-                "graceful-restart": {
-                    "graceful-restart": True
-                }
-            }
-        }
+            "bgp": {"local_as": "300", "graceful-restart": {"graceful-restart": True}}
+        },
     }
 
-    configure_gr_followed_by_clear(tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name,dut='r2', peer='r3')
-
-
+    configure_gr_followed_by_clear(tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name, dut="r2", peer="r3")
 
     step("verify Graceful restart at R2")
     for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
-        result = verify_graceful_restart(tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict,
-                                         dut='r2', peer='r3')
-        assert result is True, \
-            "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}". \
-                format(tc_name, result)
+        result = verify_graceful_restart(
+            tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r2", peer="r3"
+        )
+        assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
 
     step("verify Graceful restart at R3")
     for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
-        result = verify_graceful_restart(tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict,
-                                         dut='r3', peer='r2')
-        assert result is True, \
-            "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}". \
-                format(tc_name, result)
+        result = verify_graceful_restart(
+            tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r3", peer="r2"
+        )
+        assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
 
     step("Configuring Graceful-restart-disable at R3")
     input_dict = {
         "r2": {
-
             "bgp": {
                 "local_as": "200",
                 "graceful-restart": {
                     "graceful-restart": False,
-                }
+                },
             }
         },
         "r3": {
-            "bgp": {
-                "local_as": "300",
-                "graceful-restart": {
-                    "graceful-restart": False
-                }
-            }
-        }
+            "bgp": {"local_as": "300", "graceful-restart": {"graceful-restart": False}}
+        },
     }
-    configure_gr_followed_by_clear(tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name,dut='r3', peer='r2')
+    configure_gr_followed_by_clear(tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name, dut="r3", peer="r2")
 
     step("Verify Graceful-restart-disable at R3")
     for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
-        result = verify_graceful_restart(tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict,
-                                         dut='r3', peer='r2')
-        assert result is True, \
-            "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}". \
-                format(tc_name, result)
+        result = verify_graceful_restart(
+            tgen, topo, addr_type, input_dict, dut="r3", peer="r2"
+        )
+        assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
 
     for iteration in range(5):
         step("graceful-restart-disable:True  at R3")
         input_dict = {
-        "r3": {
-            "bgp": {
-                "graceful-restart": {
-                    "graceful-restart-disable": True,
+            "r3": {
+                "bgp": {
+                    "graceful-restart": {
+                        "graceful-restart-disable": True,
+                    }
                 }
             }
-            }
         }
-        configure_gr_followed_by_clear(tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name,
-                                   dut='r3', peer='r2')
+        configure_gr_followed_by_clear(
+            tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name, dut="r3", peer="r2"
+        )
 
         step("Verifying  Routes at R2 on enabling GRD")
-        dut = 'r2'
+        dut = "r2"
         for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
-            input_dict_1= {'r2': topo['routers']['r2']}
+            input_dict_1 = {"r2": topo["routers"]["r2"]}
             result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1)
-            assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
+            assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(
+                tc_name, result
+            )
 
         step("Verify stale Routes in Router R2 enabling GRD")
         for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@@ -495,39 +486,45 @@ def test_bgp_gr_stale_routes(request):
             verify_nh_for_static_rtes = {
                 "r3": {
                     "static_routes": [
-
                         {
                             "network": [NETWORK1_1[addr_type]],
                             "no_of_ip": 2,
-                            "vrf": "RED"
+                            "vrf": "RED",
                         }
                     ]
                 }
             }
             bgp_rib_next_hops = verify_stale_routes_list(
-            tgen, addr_type, dut, verify_nh_for_static_rtes)
-            assert (len(bgp_rib_next_hops)== 1) is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
-             tc_name, bgp_rib_next_hops,expected=True)
+                tgen, addr_type, dut, verify_nh_for_static_rtes
+            )
+            assert (
+                len(bgp_rib_next_hops) == 1
+            ) is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+                tc_name, bgp_rib_next_hops, expected=True
+            )
 
         step("graceful-restart-disable:False at R3")
         input_dict = {
-        "r3": {
-            "bgp": {
-                "graceful-restart": {
-                    "graceful-restart-disable": False,
+            "r3": {
+                "bgp": {
+                    "graceful-restart": {
+                        "graceful-restart-disable": False,
+                    }
                 }
             }
-            }
         }
-        configure_gr_followed_by_clear(tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name,
-                                   dut='r3', peer='r2')
+        configure_gr_followed_by_clear(
+            tgen, topo, input_dict, tc_name, dut="r3", peer="r2"
+        )
 
         step("Verifying  Routes at R2 on disabling GRD")
-        dut = 'r2'
+        dut = "r2"
         for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
-            input_dict_1= {'r2': topo['routers']['r2']}
+            input_dict_1 = {"r2": topo["routers"]["r2"]}
             result = verify_bgp_rib(tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict_1)
-            assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(tc_name, result)
+            assert result is True, "Testcase {} :Failed \n Error {}".format(
+                tc_name, result
+            )
 
         step("Verify stale Routes in Router R2 on disabling GRD")
         for addr_type in ADDR_TYPES:
@@ -536,19 +533,22 @@ def test_bgp_gr_stale_routes(request):
             verify_nh_for_static_rtes = {
                 "r3": {
                     "static_routes": [
-
                         {
                             "network": [NETWORK1_1[addr_type]],
                             "no_of_ip": 2,
-                            "vrf": "RED"
+                            "vrf": "RED",
                         }
                     ]
                 }
             }
-            bgp_rib_next_hops = verify_stale_routes_list(tgen, addr_type, dut, verify_nh_for_static_rtes)
-
-            stale_route_status=len(bgp_rib_next_hops)== 1
-            assert stale_route_status is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
-             tc_name, stale_route_status,expected=True)
+            bgp_rib_next_hops = verify_stale_routes_list(
+                tgen, addr_type, dut, verify_nh_for_static_rtes
+            )
+
+            stale_route_status = len(bgp_rib_next_hops) == 1
+            assert (
+                stale_route_status is True
+            ), "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
+                tc_name, stale_route_status, expected=True
+            )
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
-
index ad12b44295a0450c89d7b3b6cd54d27fd505b024..5131a89ce832512903b57e124b0842887fc78f71 100644 (file)
@@ -346,11 +346,11 @@ def test_ip_prefix_lists_out_permit(request):
     result = verify_rib(
         tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
     )
-    assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+    assert result is not True, (
+        "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
         "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-        "Found: {}".format(
-            tc_name, dut, result
-        ))
+        "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+    )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
 
@@ -447,11 +447,11 @@ def test_ip_prefix_lists_in_deny_and_permit_any(request):
     result = verify_rib(
         tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
     )
-    assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+    assert result is not True, (
+        "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
         "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} BGP RIB \n "
-        "Found: {}".format(
-            tc_name, dut, result
-        ))
+        "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+    )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
 
@@ -649,11 +649,11 @@ def test_ip_prefix_lists_out_deny_and_permit_any(request):
     result = verify_rib(
         tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
     )
-    assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+    assert result is not True, (
+        "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
         "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} BGP RIB \n "
-        "Found: {}".format(
-            tc_name, dut, result
-        ))
+        "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+    )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
 
@@ -786,11 +786,11 @@ def test_modify_prefix_lists_in_permit_to_deny(request):
     result = verify_rib(
         tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
     )
-    assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+    assert result is not True, (
+        "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
         "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} BGP RIB \n "
-        "Found: {}".format(
-            tc_name, dut, result
-        ))
+        "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+    )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
 
@@ -892,11 +892,11 @@ def test_modify_prefix_lists_in_deny_to_permit(request):
     result = verify_rib(
         tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
     )
-    assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+    assert result is not True, (
+        "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
         "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} BGP RIB \n "
-        "Found: {}".format(
-            tc_name, dut, result
-        ))
+        "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+    )
 
     # Modify  ip prefix list
     input_dict_1 = {
@@ -1063,11 +1063,11 @@ def test_modify_prefix_lists_out_permit_to_deny(request):
     result = verify_rib(
         tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
     )
-    assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+    assert result is not True, (
+        "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
         "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} BGP RIB \n "
-        "Found: {}".format(
-            tc_name, dut, result
-        ))
+        "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+    )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
 
@@ -1171,11 +1171,11 @@ def test_modify_prefix_lists_out_deny_to_permit(request):
     result = verify_rib(
         tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
     )
-    assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+    assert result is not True, (
+        "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
         "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} BGP RIB \n "
-        "Found: {}".format(
-            tc_name, dut, result
-        ))
+        "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+    )
 
     # Modify ip prefix list
     input_dict_1 = {
@@ -1340,11 +1340,11 @@ def test_ip_prefix_lists_implicit_deny(request):
     result = verify_rib(
         tgen, "ipv4", dut, input_dict_1, protocol=protocol, expected=False
     )
-    assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+    assert result is not True, (
+        "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
         "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} BGP RIB \n "
-        "Found: {}".format(
-            tc_name, dut, result
-        ))
+        "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+    )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
 
index 9179b8ed1d59f887c34257117597171009c1e05e..77bddbe3372491e5abcc8df38a52397b37dde672 100644 (file)
@@ -444,11 +444,11 @@ def test_route_map_inbound_outbound_same_neighbor_p0(request):
         result = verify_rib(
             tgen, adt, dut, input_dict_2, protocol=protocol, expected=False
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} BGP RIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
         # Verifying RIB routes
         dut = "r4"
@@ -466,11 +466,11 @@ def test_route_map_inbound_outbound_same_neighbor_p0(request):
         result = verify_rib(
             tgen, adt, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
 
@@ -664,11 +664,11 @@ def test_route_map_with_action_values_combination_of_prefix_action_p0(
             result = verify_rib(
                 tgen, adt, dut, input_dict_2, protocol=protocol, expected=False
             )
-            assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+            assert result is not True, (
+                "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
                 "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-                "Found: {}".format(
-                    tc_name, dut, result
-                ))
+                "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+            )
         else:
             result = verify_rib(tgen, adt, dut, input_dict_2, protocol=protocol)
             assert result is True, "Testcase {} : Failed \n Error: {}".format(
index 8b4a3b3544ae3f35e05d7abaeb6ac75f82d1a531..589482d6a594ca17650598dc2466c04d6297715d 100644 (file)
@@ -1022,11 +1022,11 @@ def test_modify_prefix_list_referenced_by_rmap_p0():
         result = verify_rib(
             tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     # Verifying RIB routes
     dut = "r4"
@@ -1035,11 +1035,11 @@ def test_modify_prefix_list_referenced_by_rmap_p0():
         result = verify_rib(
             tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
 
@@ -1292,11 +1292,11 @@ def test_remove_prefix_list_referenced_by_rmap_p0():
         result = verify_rib(
             tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     # Verifying RIB routes
     dut = "r4"
@@ -1305,11 +1305,11 @@ def test_remove_prefix_list_referenced_by_rmap_p0():
         result = verify_rib(
             tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
 
@@ -2136,11 +2136,11 @@ def test_add_remove_rmap_to_specific_neighbor_p0():
         result = verify_rib(
             tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     # Remove applied rmap from neighbor
     input_dict_4 = {
@@ -2549,11 +2549,11 @@ def test_rmap_without_match_and_set_clause_p0():
         result = verify_rib(
             tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
     # Uncomment next line for debugging
@@ -2796,11 +2796,11 @@ def test_set_localpref_weight_to_ebgp_and_med_to_ibgp_peers_p0():
             input_dict_3_addr_type[addr_type],
             expected=False,
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: BGP attributes should not be set in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     # Verifying RIB routes
     dut = "r5"
@@ -2829,11 +2829,11 @@ def test_set_localpref_weight_to_ebgp_and_med_to_ibgp_peers_p0():
             input_dict_3_addr_type[addr_type],
             expected=False,
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: BGP attributes should not be set in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
 
@@ -3637,11 +3637,11 @@ def test_create_rmap_match_prefix_list_to_deny_in_and_outbound_prefixes_p0():
         result = verify_rib(
             tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     # Verifying RIB routes
     dut = "r4"
@@ -3650,11 +3650,11 @@ def test_create_rmap_match_prefix_list_to_deny_in_and_outbound_prefixes_p0():
         result = verify_rib(
             tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)
 
@@ -3954,11 +3954,11 @@ def test_create_rmap_to_match_tag_deny_outbound_prefixes_p0():
         result = verify_rib(
             tgen, addr_type, dut, input_dict, protocol=protocol, expected=False
         )
-        assert result is not True, ("Testcase {} : Failed \n "
+        assert result is not True, (
+            "Testcase {} : Failed \n "
             "Expected: Routes should not be present in {} FIB \n "
-            "Found: {}".format(
-                tc_name, dut, result
-            ))
+            "Found: {}".format(tc_name, dut, result)
+        )
 
     write_test_footer(tc_name)