When helpers like bpf_get_stack returns an int value
and later on used for arithmetic computation, the LSH and ARSH
operations are often required to get proper sign extension into
64-bit. For example, without this patch:
54: R0=inv(id=0,umax_value=800)
54: (bf) r8 = r0
55: R0=inv(id=0,umax_value=800) R8_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=800)
55: (67) r8 <<= 32
56: R8_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=
3435973836800,var_off=(0x0; 0x3ff00000000))
56: (c7) r8 s>>= 32
57: R8=inv(id=0)
With this patch:
54: R0=inv(id=0,umax_value=800)
54: (bf) r8 = r0
55: R0=inv(id=0,umax_value=800) R8_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=800)
55: (67) r8 <<= 32
56: R8_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=
3435973836800,var_off=(0x0; 0x3ff00000000))
56: (c7) r8 s>>= 32
57: R8=inv(id=0, umax_value=800,var_off=(0x0; 0x3ff))
With better range of "R8", later on when "R8" is added to other register,
e.g., a map pointer or scalar-value register, the better register
range can be derived and verifier failure may be avoided.
In our later example,
......
usize = bpf_get_stack(ctx, raw_data, max_len, BPF_F_USER_STACK);
if (usize < 0)
return 0;
ksize = bpf_get_stack(ctx, raw_data + usize, max_len - usize, 0);
......
Without improving ARSH value range tracking, the register representing
"max_len - usize" will have smin_value equal to S64_MIN and will be
rejected by verifier.
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
/* Arithmetic and logical ops */
/* Shift a tnum left (by a fixed shift) */
struct tnum tnum_lshift(struct tnum a, u8 shift);
-/* Shift a tnum right (by a fixed shift) */
+/* Shift (rsh) a tnum right (by a fixed shift) */
struct tnum tnum_rshift(struct tnum a, u8 shift);
+/* Shift (arsh) a tnum right (by a fixed min_shift) */
+struct tnum tnum_arshift(struct tnum a, u8 min_shift);
/* Add two tnums, return @a + @b */
struct tnum tnum_add(struct tnum a, struct tnum b);
/* Subtract two tnums, return @a - @b */
return TNUM(a.value >> shift, a.mask >> shift);
}
+struct tnum tnum_arshift(struct tnum a, u8 min_shift)
+{
+ /* if a.value is negative, arithmetic shifting by minimum shift
+ * will have larger negative offset compared to more shifting.
+ * If a.value is nonnegative, arithmetic shifting by minimum shift
+ * will have larger positive offset compare to more shifting.
+ */
+ return TNUM((s64)a.value >> min_shift, (s64)a.mask >> min_shift);
+}
+
struct tnum tnum_add(struct tnum a, struct tnum b)
{
u64 sm, sv, sigma, chi, mu;
/* We may learn something more from the var_off */
__update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
break;
+ case BPF_ARSH:
+ if (umax_val >= insn_bitness) {
+ /* Shifts greater than 31 or 63 are undefined.
+ * This includes shifts by a negative number.
+ */
+ mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* Upon reaching here, src_known is true and
+ * umax_val is equal to umin_val.
+ */
+ dst_reg->smin_value >>= umin_val;
+ dst_reg->smax_value >>= umin_val;
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_arshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
+
+ /* blow away the dst_reg umin_value/umax_value and rely on
+ * dst_reg var_off to refine the result.
+ */
+ dst_reg->umin_value = 0;
+ dst_reg->umax_value = U64_MAX;
+ __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
+ break;
default:
mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg);
break;