sched/fair: Fix wake_affine_llc() balancing rules

Chris Wilson reported that the SMT balance rules got the +1 on the
wrong side, resulting in a bias towards the current LLC; which the
load-balancer would then try and undo.

Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 90001d67be2f ("sched/fair: Fix wake_affine() for !NUMA_BALANCING")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170906105131.gqjmaextmn3u6tj2@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8d5868771cb307c8dbfe5f2b08e6e16b1018e18b..9dd2ce1e5ca2aa192b669f9e7551404f1fff28aa 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5435,7 +5435,7 @@ wake_affine_llc(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
                return false;
 
        /* if this cache has capacity, come here */
-       if (this_stats.has_capacity && this_stats.nr_running < prev_stats.nr_running+1)
+       if (this_stats.has_capacity && this_stats.nr_running+1 < prev_stats.nr_running)
                return true;
 
        /*